Article

Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist.

Contemporary Issues in Education Research. 4 (6), 01/2011; 4:21-27.

ABSTRACT The paper describes the considerations that were taken into account in the development of a tentative English language textbook evaluation checklist. A brief review of the related literature precedes the crucial issues that should be considered in developing checklists. In the light of the previous evaluation checklists the developers created a list of the evaluative criteria on which the construct of the checklist could be established. The developers considered matters of validity, reliability and practicality in the process of its design; however, further research is in process to refine the checklist. Such an instrument could be used by curriculum designers, material developers and evaluators, as well as English language teachers.

21 Followers
 · 
2,339 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has recently been an increasingly widespread demand for integrated skills materials among ELT practitioners and institutions. This trend has evolved from the communicative language teaching movement that emerged in the 1970s. Skill integration has been seen as an effective way to engage learners as it reflects the natural use of the target language. Integration was first realized in teaching methodology before it started to influence material writing. However, in many cases, integration has become more like a fashion, with no clear understanding about how two skills or more can be integrated in one textbook or whether such integration has made language learning and teaching more effective. This article examines the integration of reading and writing skills in a number of commercial English language teaching (ELT) materials. It first reviews the literature on the integration of these two skills, focusing on the underlying principles and sub-skills. It then reports the findings of an analysis of integration of reading and writing in selected English as a second/foreign language (ESL/EFL) textbooks. Finally, it offers some guidelines and suggestions for how skill integration can be handled more effectively.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT English for Specific Purposes (ESP) has become one of the predominant approaches to language teaching in tertiary education, as it is directed towards the specific needs of the particular specialty students. The study concerns about the role of needs analysis and materials evaluation in designing ESP courses meeting the needs of students in tertiary education. The purpose of this study was to find out whether ESP courses in Iran had been developed according to the principles of ESP course design.Participants of the study were selected from Chabahar Maritime University in Iran, consisting of two groups of senior students majoring at management and fisheries as well as a group of lectures teaching ESP courses. In this study three instruments were used. First, a needs analysis questionnaire administered to students to find out their needs, lack and wants. The second tool to get data was a curriculum design analysis questionnaire, administered to lecturers to find out the elements of ESP courses. The third tool was ESP textbooks used for the aforementioned students, evaluated for their appropriateness to the specific needs of students. The results were analyzed and the findings showed that the ESP textbooks used at faculties of management and fisheries at Chabahar Maritime University were not complied in accordance with the specific needs of students and they did not have the power to motivate and in turn facilitate students' language learning.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Checklists are instruments that help teachers or researchers in the area of English Language Teaching (ELT) to evaluate teaching-learning materials like textbooks. Several checklists are available in the literature, most of which lack validity. The paper discusses the results of a survey that investigated a group of English as a Second Language (ESL) experts’ (n=207) views on a checklist developed by the present researchers. The results showed an equal level of importance for all the items of the checklist. Additionally, based on the findings of factor analysis, two items were removed from the checklist. The study offers useful implications for ELT practitioners and researchers. Further research is necessary to field test the checklist for its validity and reliability.
    06/2012; 3(6):1128-1134. DOI:10.4304/jltr.3.6.1128-1134

Full-text

Download
511 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014