Sensitization to chloramphenicol
Servicio de Alergologia, Hospital Santiago Apostol, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. Contact Dermatitis
(Impact Factor: 3.75).
02/1992; 26(1):66-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00883.x
Available from: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Contact hypersensitivity may be diagnosed with patch testing or intradermal testing. Although these methods have been used earlier in parallel, patch testing has gradually become the only method in routine diagnosis of contact allergy. Recent findings in corticosteroid contact hypersensitivity have shown that patch testing is not always an optimal method, especially when poor penetrants are used. Therefore, a reappraisal of intradermal testing is presented, based on the literature. Studies employing both patch and intradermal testing are reviewed and the advantages and disadvantages of intradermal tests as compared to patch tests in contact allergy diagnostics are discussed. We find that it might be worthwhile to evaluate whether contact allergy to compounds other than corticosteroids may be easier to detect with intradermal than patch test.
Contact Dermatitis 08/1993; 29(1):1-5. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb04527.x · 3.75 Impact Factor
Allergy 02/1996; 51(1):69-70. DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb04559.x · 6.03 Impact Factor
Allergy 02/1996; 51(1):67-9. DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb00018.x · 6.03 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.