Repeated stressful experiences differently affect limbic dopamine release during and following stress.

Institute of Medical Pharmacology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2.83). 05/1992; 577(2):194-9. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90274-D
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The effects of repeated restraint stress exposures (daily 60 min, for 6 days) on extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, during and after the stress experience, have been investigated in rats by in vivo microdialysis. On the first day, restraint increased dopamine release during the first 40 min followed by a return to basal levels (50-60 min later). As soon as restraint ceased and the rats were set free, there was another increase in dopamine release lasting 40 min. On the second and third day, restraint produced only a slight increase in dopamine release, while no significant changes were evident from the fourth to the sixth day. By contrast, from the second to the sixth day the increase in dopamine release observed once rats were freed, was unchanged in comparison to the first day. The present results show that the activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system induced by aversive stimuli adapts to repeated experiences differently from that produced by pleasurable events, suggesting that aversive and rewarding experiences involve different neural systems.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used in vivo microdialysis to examine interindividual differences in the effects of acute immobilization stress and diazepam treatment on monoamine turnover in the hippocampus of male rats as an index of stress. Immobilization significantly increased the concentrations of 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-aceticacid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA), and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). This effect was attenuated by injection of diazepam, Interindividual differences in reactivity to stressors caused differential changes in different metabolic products of monoamines. In our study, stress-induced changes in DOPAC levels were relatively great, and there was a similar change in the concentration of HVA. We conclude that at least 2 indexes of stress should be measured to take into account interindividual differences in the changes in stress indexes.
    Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 10/2005; 10(4). DOI:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2005.tb00014.x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Increased sensitivity to stress and dysfunctional reward processing are two primary characteristics of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) that may persist following remission. Preclinical work has established the pivotal role of the striatum in mediating both stress and reward responses. Human neuroimaging studies have corroborated these preclinical findings and highlighted striatal dysfunction in MDD in response to reward, but have yet to investigate striatal function during stress, in particular in individuals with recurrent depression. Methods Thirty three remitted individuals with a history of recurrent MDD (rMDD) and 35 matched healthy controls underwent a validated mild psychological stress task involving viewing of negative stimuli during fMRI. Cortisol and anxiety levels were assessed throughout scanning. Stress-related activation was investigated in three striatal regions: caudate, nucleus accumbens (Nacc), and putamen. Psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analyses probed connectivity of those regions with central structures of the neural stress circuitry, the amygdala and hippocampus. Results The task increased cortisol and anxiety levels, although to a greater extent in rMDD than healthy controls. In response to the negative stimuli, rMDD individuals, but not controls, also exhibited significantly potentiated caudate, Nacc, and putamen activations, as well as increased caudate-amygdala and caudate-hippocampus connectivity. Conclusions Findings highlight striatal hyper-sensitivity in response to a mild psychological stress in rMDD, as manifested by hyper-activation and hyper-connectivity with the amygdala and hippocampus. Striatal hyper-sensitivity during stress might thus constitute a trait mark of depression, providing a potential neural substrate for the interaction between stress and reward dysfunction in MDD.
    Biological Psychiatry 10/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.019 · 9.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Survival is dictated by an organism's fitness in approaching positive stimuli and avoiding harm. While a rich literature outlines a role for mesolimbic dopamine in reward and appetitive behaviors, dopamine's involvement in aversion and avoidance behaviors remains controversial. Debate surrounding dopamine's function in the processing of negative stimuli likely stems from conflicting results reported by single-unit electrophysiological studies. Indeed, a number of studies suggest that midbrain dopaminergic cells are inhibited by the presentation of negative or fearful stimuli, whilst others report no change, or even an increase, in their activity. These disparate results may be due to population heterogeneity. Recent evidence demonstrates that midbrain dopamine neurons are heterogeneous in their projection targets, responses to environmental stimuli, pharmacology and influences on motivated behavior. Thus, in order to assemble an accurate account of dopamine function during aversive stimulus experience and related behavior it is necessary to examine the functional output of dopamine neural activity at mesolimbic terminal regions. This review presents a growing body of evidence that dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens encodes not only reward, but also aversion. For example, our laboratory recently utilized fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to show that real-time changes in accumbal dopamine release are detected when animals are presented with predictors of aversion and its avoidance. These data, along with other reports, support a considerably more nuanced view of dopamine neuron function, wherein accumbal dopamine release is differentially modulated by positive and negative affective stimuli to promote adaptive behaviors.
    ACS Chemical Neuroscience 12/2014; 6(1). DOI:10.1021/cn500255p · 4.21 Impact Factor