Article
Endosseous cylinder implants in severely atrophic mandibles.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas 75246.
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants (impact factor:
1.78).
02/1991;
6(3):264-9.
pp.264-9
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Implants in the severely resorbed mandibles: whether or not to augment? What is the clinician's preference?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to inventory in the Netherlands which therapy is the clinician's first choice when restoring the edentulous mandible. A questionnaire was sent to all Dutch Oral and Maxillofacial surgeons. As part of this, the surgeons were invited to treat five virtual edentulous patients, differing only in mandibular residual height. In cases of a sufficient residual height of 15 mm, all surgeons were in favour to insert solely two implants to anchor an overdenture. In case of a residual height of 12 mm, 10% of the surgeons choose for an augmentation procedure. If a patient was presented with a mandibular height of 10 mm, already 40% of the OMF surgeons executed an augmentation procedure. Most (80%) surgeons prefer the (anterior) iliac crest as donor site. The choice of 'whether or not to augment' was not influenced by the surgeon's age; however, the hospital, where he was trained, did. Surgeons trained in Groningen were more in favour of installing short implants in mandibles with reduced vertical height. As the option overdenture supported on two interforaminal implants is reimbursed by the Dutch health assurance, this treatment modality is very popular in the Netherlands. From a point of costs and to minimize bypass comorbidity, surgeons should be more reluctant in executing augmentation procedures to restore the resorbed edentulous mandible as it is dated in literature that also in mandibles with a residual height of 10 mm or less, solely placing implants, thus without an augmentation procedure in advance, is a reliable treatment option.Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 08/2011; 15(4):225-31.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
anteriorly
complete mandibular fracture
fixtures
lateral cephalometric radiographs
maximum anterior height
mental foramina
partial mandibular fracture
patients
retrospective study
standard clinical criteria
success rate
temporary bilateral mental nerve hypoesthesia