Article

Hyperinsulinaemia: the key feature of a cardiovascular and metabolic syndrome.

Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.
Diabetologia (Impact Factor: 6.88). 07/1991; 34(6):416-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00403180
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a population-based survey of 2,930 subjects, prevalence rates for obesity, Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension, hypertriglyceridaemia, and hypercholesterolaemia were 54.3, 9.3, 11.1, 9.8, 10.3 and 9.2%, respectively. The prevalence, however, of each of these conditions in its isolated form (free of the other five) was 29.0% for obesity, 1.3% for Type 2 diabetes, 1.8% for impaired glucose tolerance, 1.5% for hypertension, 1.0% for hypertriglyceridaemia, and 1.7% for hypercholesterolaemia. Two-by-two associations were even rarer. The large differences in prevalence between isolated and mixed forms indicate a major overlap among the six disorders in multiple combinations. In the isolated form, each condition was characterized by hyperinsulinaemia (both fasting and 2 h after oral glucose), suggesting the presence of insulin resistance. In addition, in any isolated condition most of the variables categorising other members of the sextet were still significantly altered in comparison with 1,049 normal subjects. In the whole of the subjects who presented with one or another disorder (1,881 of 2,930 or 64%), marked fasting and post-glucose hyperinsulinaemia was associated with higher body mass index, waist:hip ratio, fasting and post-glucose glycaemia, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum triglycerides and total cholesterol levels, and with lower HDL-cholesterol concentrations (all p less than 0.001). We conclude that (1) insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, blood pressure, body fat mass and distribution, and serum lipids are a network of mutually interrelated functions; and (2) an insulin resistance syndrome underlies each and all of the six disorders carrying an increased risk of coronary artery disease.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
109 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS) is a clustering of interrelated risk factors that promote the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. These interrelated risk factors have a direct effect on atherogenic dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, and elevated plasma glucose, and promote proinflammatory and prothrombic states. Mechanisms of the major underlying forces of CMS—abdominal obesity and insulin resistance—are discussed and include review of obesity-induced inflammation with the development of abdominal obesity. Two clinical case studies are presented for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease patients with discussion of clinical management based on guideline recommendations.
    The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 10/2008; 4(9):673-680. DOI:10.1016/j.nurpra.2008.07.018
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Many MetS related biomarkers had been discovered, which provided the possibility for building the MetS prediction model. In this paper we aimed to develop a novel routine biomarker-based risk prediction model for MetS in urban Han Chinese population.Methods Exploring Factor analysis (EFA) was firstly conducted in MetS positive 13,345 males and 3,212 females respectively for extracting synthetic latent predictors (SLPs) from 11 routine biomarkers. Then, depending on the cohort with 5 years follow-up in 1,565 subjects (male 1,020 and female 545), a Cox model for predicting 5 years MetS was built by using SLPs as predictor; Area under the ROC curves (AUC) with 10 fold cross validation was used to evaluate its power. Absolute risk (AR) and relative absolute risk (RAR) were calculated to develop a risk matrix for visualization of risk assessment.ResultsSix SLPs were extracted by EFA from 11 routine health check-up biomarkers. Each of them reflected the specific pathogenesis of MetS, with inflammatory factor (IF) contributed by WBC & LC & NGC, erythrocyte parameter factor (EPF) by Hb & HCT, blood pressure factor (BPF) by SBP & DBP, lipid metabolism factor (LMF) by TG & HDL-C, obesity condition factor (OCF) by BMI, and glucose metabolism factor (GMF) by FBG with the total contribution of 81.55% and 79.65% for males and females respectively. The proposed metabolic syndrome synthetic predictor (MSP) based predict model demonstrated good performance for predicting 5 years MetS with the AUC of 0.802 (95% CI 0.776-0.826) in males and 0.902 (95% CI 0.874-0.925) in females respectively, even after 10 fold cross validation, AUC was still enough high with 0.796 (95%CI 0.770-0.821) in males and 0.897 (95%CI 0.868-0.921) in females. More importantly, the MSP based risk matrix with a series of risk warning index provided a feasible and practical tool for visualization of risk assessment in the prediction of MetS.Conclusions MetS could be explained by six SLPs in Chinese urban Han population. The proposed MSP based predict model demonstrated good performance for predicting 5 years MetS, and the MetS-based matrix provided a feasible and practical tool.
    BMC Public Health 01/2015; 15(1):64. DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1424-z · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We aimed to assess the magnitude and duration of risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) associated with splenectomy for splenic injury.We identified 5139 splenectomized patients (the splenectomy cohort) to compare with 2 other cohorts for assessing the magnitude and risk of ACS: the first cohort comprising subjects without splenic injury and without splenectomy (control cohort), and the second cohort comprising nonsplenectomized patients with splenic injury (nonsplenectomy cohort; n = 6391). For each splenic injury patient (n = 11530), 4 control comparisons were frequency-matched by the year of index date, age, and sex (n = 46120).The adjusted risk of ACS was significantly higher in the splenectomy group than in the control group (2.08 vs 1.68 per 1000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.68). The sex-specific data showed that the adjusted HR for the splenectomy group, compared with the control group, was 1.29 in men (95% CI, 0.97-1.73) and 1.36 in women (95% CI, 0.79-2.33). The age-specific analyses failed to demonstrate a significantly higher adjusted HR of ACS in the splenectomized patients in any age subgroup, compared with their counterparts in the control group. Furthermore, no difference in the risk of ACS was detected between the splenectomy and nonsplenectomy cohorts within the splenic injury patients.In comparison with the control cohort, patients undergoing splenectomy for splenic injury exhibited an elevated risk of ACS.
    Medicine 03/2015; 94(9):e610. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000000610 · 4.87 Impact Factor