Article

Ethanol preference in the Harrington derivation of the Maudsley Reactive and Non-Reactive strains.

Department of Social Science, Winston Salem State University, North Carolina 27110.
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (Impact Factor: 3.31). 04/1991; 15(2):170-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1991.tb01849.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ethanol intake was explored in the Harrington derivation of the Maudsley Reactive and Maudsley Non-Reactive rat strains (MR/Har and MNRA/Har). When 5% and 10% ethanol solutions were presented as the sole source of fluid (1-bottle test), MR/Har rats, respectively, ingested 15% more, or 9% less, than their baseline water intake, whereas MNRAs ingested 6% less, or 42% less than their baseline intake. However, because MNRA/Har rats drank significantly more water than MR/Har's under ad libitum conditions (MNRA/Har, 46.6 +/- 1.83 ml; MR/Har 32.45 +/- 1.64 ml/24 hr), males and females of the two strains ingested a similar amount of ethanol in the 1-bottle test (5% ethanol, 4-7; 10% ethanol, 6-12 g/kg body weight/24 hr). In 2-bottle free-choice tests administered after an extended period of forced ethanol consumption, MR/Har male and female rats exhibited a strong ethanol preference (X = 80%) and consumed a larger amount of ethanol (MR/Har, 7-13; MNRA/Har, 6-9 g/kg body weight/24 hr) than MNRA/Har's. Across all conditions, females of both strains ingested a greater relative amount of ethanol than males. The strain difference in ethanol preference was found to be independent of prior exposure to ethanol because it was also found when 2-bottle free-choice tests were carried out in naive animals (Experiment 2). The pattern of development of ethanol preference in individual animals was characterized by abrupt onset, after variable periods of exposure to the 2-bottle choice test, and maintenance of strong ethanol preference thereafter. The extensive behavioral and biological definition of the Maudsley strains is a valuable asset in attempting to elucidate the biobehavioral correlates of ethanol preference.

1 Follower
 · 
51 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Young male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (30 days old) were assigned randomly to three treatment groups: (1) alcohol treatment—received beer with 5% ethanol added, food, and water ad libitum; (2) pair-fed treatment—received nonalcoholic beer plus sucrose and food to match intake by the alcohol-treated animals; and (3) control treatment—received food and water ad libitum. Animals were tested for alcohol preference for 24 hr and then received their assigned treatments for a period of 30 days, followed by a period of abstinence before alcohol preference testing again at 74 days of age. Males given free access to beer and water did not drink large quantities of beer. Females given free access to beer and water drank a lot of beer on the first day, but decreased intake until ˜52 days of age. A developmental change in young female rats at ˜52 days of age resulted in increased voluntary ethanol intake, possibly caused by hormonal changes associated with the establishment of estrous cycles. When the animals were tested for alcohol preference at 74 days of age after a period of abstinence, males and females in the pair-fed group had greater alcohol preference than animals in the other groups. Females in the pair-fed group had greater alcohol intake based on body weight than males in the pair-fed group and males and females in all other groups. These results provide insight into sex differences in the development of voluntary drinking behavior and responses of drinking behavior to the early stress of pair-feeding.
    Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 04/2006; 20(6):1043 - 1049. DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01945.x · 3.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Saccharin and ethanol intakes were measured in seven strains of rats known to differ in their preferences for ethanol: The Fawn-Hooded (FH), alcohol-preferring (P) and Maudsley Reactive rats have been reported to drink ethanol voluntarily, whereas the alcohol-nonpreferring, Maudsley Nonreactive and Flinders Line (FSL and FRL) rats do not. Saccharin and ethanol intakes were highly correlated (r =+0.61) over all strains, with the FH rats drinking the most of both solutions. Correlation coefficients between pairs of drinking versus nondrinking rat strains were even higher. In a second experiment, genetically heterogeneous F2 progeny from cross-breeding the ethanol-preferring FH rats with the ethanol-nonpreferring Flinders Resistant Line (FRL) rats were studied. The results indicated a high positive correlation between saccharin and ethanol intakes (+0.65). These findings suggest that the association between saccharin and ethanol intakes previously reported in rat strains with different preferences for ethanol may have a similar genetic basis.
    Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 03/1993; 17(2):366 - 369. DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00777.x · 3.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Recent evidence suggests that human infants prefer alcohol-flavored milk when fed through a bottle. Animal models also indicate a surprising predisposition for neonatal and infant rats to voluntarily and willingly ingest ethanol. These findings suggest high susceptibility to the reinforcing properties of ethanol early in ontogeny. Methods: A surrogate nipple technique-a highly effective tool for investigation of the reinforcing properties of different fluids-was applied in the present study. Tests of ethanol reinforcement were accomplished in terms of two basic paradigms of Pavlovian conditioning. In one paradigm, the conditioned stimulus (CS) was the surrogate nipple, and in the other, the CS was a novel odor. Results: Newborn rats showed sustained attachment to the nipple providing 5% ethanol, and later reproduced this behavioral pattern toward the empty nipple (CS alone). Ingestion of ethanol yielding appetitive reinforcement was accompanied by detectable blood alcohol concentrations, with most in the range of 20-30 mg/dl. The reinforcing efficacy of ethanol was also confirmed in the classical olfactory conditioning paradigm: following pairing with intraoral ethanol infusions, the odor (CS) alone elicited sustained attachment to an empty nipple. Females showed better olfactory conditioning with low concentrations of ethanol, whereas males were effectively more conditioned to high concentrations. Although there were no reinforcing consequences of intraperitoneally injected ethanol [as an unconditioned stimulus (US)] when a neutral odor was the CS, when paired with ingestion of water from a nipple, the injection of ethanol had a reinforcing effect. Conclusions: The present series of experiments revealed ethanol reinforcement in the newborn rat. Two varieties of Pavlovian conditioning established that ethanol can serve as an effective US, and hence reinforcer, in such a way as to increase the approach and responsiveness toward stimuli paired with that US, indicating appetitive reinforcement.
    Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 03/2001; 25(3):391-402. DOI:10.1097/00000374-200103000-00011 · 3.31 Impact Factor