Article

Personality Disorders in the Public Sector

New York State Office of Mental Health, New York.
Hospital & community psychiatry 06/1991; 42(5):481-7. DOI: 10.1176/ps.42.5.481
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Using a clinical data base for New York state hospitals, the authors examined the prevalence of DSM-III axis II personality disorders in state hospital patients and explored the patterns of comorbidity between axis I and axis II disorders. They found that 11 percent of the patients received a diagnosis of personality disorder and that these patients were more likely than other patients to have a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, major affective disorder, dysthymia, and substance use disorder other than alcoholism. Comparison of state hospital data with data from nonstate facilities showed different patterns of coexisting primary diagnoses and personality disorders and a much higher frequency of borderline personality disorder in nonstate patients. Based on the low percentage of state hospital patients diagnosed as having personality disorders, the authors conclude that axis II disorders are underreported in state facilities.

0 Followers
 · 
49 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMEN: Existe una alta prevalencia de Trastornos de la Personalidad (TP), tanto en la población general como en las poblaciones psiquiátricas. Podría considerarse que el diagnóstico de los TP es inútil, ya que por su actual y discutida definición, son patrones de conducta que son permanentes e inflexibles, y por lo tanto diagnosticar un TP sólo serviría para considerar a ese paciente un enfermo desahuciado, con el que no valdría la pena más que realizar unos cuidados paliativos. También podría llevarnos a evitar este diagnóstico dejarnos guiar por el gran estrés que genera al clínico no familiarizado con los TP, por las distorsiones y problemas que generan en la relación con el clínico y con otros pacientes o porque exigen un proceso de atención costoso desde el punto de vista económico, de tiempo y de medios diagnósticos. Múltiples investigaciones hacen aconsejable que se valore la presencia de un TP en todos aquellos pacientes que acudan a los servicios de salud mental. Porque aumentan el número de síntomas y la intensidad de la psicopatología del Eje I, provocan mayor incidencia de enfermedades mentales primarias, incrementan el coste económico si no se tratan, generan un mayor sufrimiento personal del paciente y de las personas de su entorno e influyen en la evolución de enfermedades médicas generales. Además, su identificación mejora la relación médico-paciente, permite prevenir graves alteraciones como suicidio y formas prematuras de muerte y se generan nuevas posibilidades de tratamiento, pues existen terapias que disminuyen la intensidad de los síntomas. ABSTRACT: There is a high prevalence of Personality Disorders (PD) in the general and psychiatric populations. PD diagnosis could be considered useless, as its current definition, if are consider as a permanent and inflexible pattern of behavior. In this way PD patients would be consider as a terminally ill patient, with not worth more than making a palliative care. The great stress of the clinician not familiar with the PD, the distortions and problems caused in the relationship with clinician and other patient, the expensive care process and the difficult in time and diagnosis could also lead us to avoid PD diagnosis. Several researches propose to assess the presence of a PD in all patients who come to mental health services because they increase the number of symptoms and severity of Axis I psychopathology, the incidence of primary mental illnesses and the economic cost if left untreated. Also it generates personal suffering of patients and the people around them and influences the evolution of general medical illnesses. Furthermore, PD diagnosis improves doctor-patient relationship, can prevent serious disorders such as suicide and premature death and generate new possibilities for treatment, as there are therapies that lessen the severity of symptoms.
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study had two main aims: to determine the stability over time of the diagnosis borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a psychiatric hospital population; and to assess the quality and effectiveness of treatment offered within state mental health service. The case notes of 47 psychiatric hospital patients followed up for 3 years after the index admission were analysed. The mean number of previous psychiatric hospital admissions was 9.0, and at least 74% of the sample had further admissions (mean 3.7) during the 3 year follow-up. Comorbidity with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder was rare, and was only 13% with major depression. Longitudinal stability of diagnosis was very high. The study firmly supported BPD as a valid diagnosis. Its treatment within the state mental health system was generally haphazard and ineffective. Post-discharge plans were implemented for only 3 subjects. Current moves toward community psychiatric treatment represent a unique opportunity for improving treatment of BPD by using existing resources more effectively.
    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 10/1995; 29(3):409-14. DOI:10.3109/00048679509064948 · 3.77 Impact Factor
Show more