Article

The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and refractory osteomyelitis.

Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery (Impact Factor: 0.51). 08/1990; 7(3):483-92.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the care of the diabetic patient with nonhealing ulcers, refractory osteomyelitis, or both of the lower extremity can be a valuable adjunct in their overall treatment. Adequate tissue oxygenation to promote wound healing and stimulate cellular defenses can be achieved in a hyperbaric environment. Several clinical studies have supported its use in select patients.

2 Followers
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Perineal involvement in Crohn's disease is a common and distressing condition, often refractory to medical or surgical treatments. Recent reports suggest the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) in the healing of perineal lesions. We evaluated HBO in severe patients with perineal Crohn's disease. Ten consecutive patients (8 women, 2 men; mean age, 30 years) were studied. There were four superficial fissures, four cavitating ulcers, six low or superficial fistulas, two high fistulas, and one irreversible anal stenosis. All patients had received one or more medical treatments without healing the perineal lesions, and all had had previous surgery for perineal lesions. Two patients discontinued HBO after a few sessions and did not complete treatment. Eight patients completed at least 30 HBO sessions and were evaluable. At the end of the procedure, six of eight patients treated were healed, three completely and three partially. All patients who healed completely received HBO as an additional treatment to local perineal surgery. HBO might be useful as a last resort treatment of chronic perineal Crohn's disease, resistant to other treatments or as a complement to surgery.
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 07/1995; 38(6):609-14. DOI:10.1007/BF02054120 · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study sought to determine whether infrapopliteal transcatheter interventions can salvage ischemic limbs in diabetic patients referred for below the knee amputation at our institution. The value of transcatheter interventions in diabetic crural arteries is controversial. Tissue oxygen partial pressure (TCO2) levels < 40 mm Hg predict poor wound healing. Percutaneous interventions were performed in 29 consecutive diabetic patients in need of limb salvage. Technical success was defined as < 20% residual vessel stenosis. Clinical success was defined as the avoidance of amputation and achievement of wound healing. At hospital discharge, patients were treated with Coumadin and aspirin. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and TCO2 measurements were obtained before and after the intervention. After 12-month follow-up, six patients had presistent wounds, whereas 23 experienced wound healing. Forty of the 50 infrapopliteal arteries successfully dilated were occluded, with a mean (+/-SD) lesion length of 18.0 +/- 3.5 cm. After the procedure, TCO2 improved from 27.82 +/- 9.97 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.95 to 31.69) to 54.5 +/- 14.73 mm Hg (95% CI 48.79 to 60.21, p < 0.0001), whereas the ABI did not (p > 0.2). TCO2 predicted procedural and clinical success (p < 0.0182). Infrapopliteal transcatheter interventions in diabetic patients may salvage the majority of limbs doomed to amputation. Although TCO2 measurements are valuable in predicting wound healing and success after interventions, ABI measurements are not.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 09/1997; 30(3):664-9. DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00216-7 · 15.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To document peer-reviewed medical publications that have reported on hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy as an adjunct to standard lower-extremity wound care, focusing on publications dealing with the diabetic foot. A review of the medical literature was conducted using MEDLINE. Research articles involving HBO treatment and the diabetic foot were critiqued to identify factors that may have been a source of bias. Of the published reports on human studies, seven involved diabetes-related foot pathology. Five of these studies, two of which were randomized, included a control group that did not receive HBO therapy The controlled diabetic foot studies included an average of 28 subjects in the HBO therapy group (range 10-62) and an average of 16.2 subjects in the non-HBO control group (range 5-33). Most of the published reports have several potential sources of bias, including, but not limited to, inadequate evaluation of comorbid conditions relevant to wound healing, small sample size, and poor documentation of wound size or severity. Four of the seven reports involving the diabetic foot were published by a group of researchers at the University of Milan between 1987 and 1996. Additional randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials in large diabetic populations would further lend credence to the presumption that HBO therapy improves clinical outcomes. Given the relatively high cost of this treatment modality, perhaps a more acute awareness of the medical literature would reduce the economic burden that HBO therapy imposes on care providers that are financially at risk.
    Diabetes Care 11/2000; 23(10):1551-5. DOI:10.2337/diacare.23.10.1551 · 8.57 Impact Factor