Article

The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States.

Division of Bacterial Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
American Journal of Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.78). 12/1990; 132(5):910-25.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe the epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States, the authors analyzed National Hospital Discharge Survey data for the years 1979-1984. Approximately 250,000 cases of appendicitis occurred annually in the United States during this period, accounting for an estimated 1 million hospital days per year. The highest incidence of primary positive appendectomy (appendicitis) was found in persons aged 10-19 years (23.3 per 10,000 population per year); males had higher rates of appendicitis than females for all age groups (overall rate ratio, 1.4:1). Racial, geographic, and seasonal differences were also noted. Appendicitis rates were 1.5 times higher for whites than for nonwhites, highest (15.4 per 10,000 population per year) in the west north central region, and 11.3% higher in the summer than in the winter months. The highest rate of incidental appendectomy was found in women aged 35-44 years (43.8 per 10,000 population per year), 12.1 times higher than the rate for men of the same age. Between 1970 and 1984, the incidence of appendicitis decreased by 14.6%; reasons for this decline are unknown. A life table model suggests that the lifetime risk of appendicitis is 8.6% for males and 6.7% for females; the lifetime risk of appendectomy is 12.0% for males and 23.1% for females. Overall, an estimated 36 incidental procedures are performed to prevent one case of appendicitis; for the elderly, the preventive value of an incidental procedure is considerably lower.

1 Bookmark
 · 
304 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. This study aimed to evaluate Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), diagnostic delay, and factors responsible for possible late diagnosis in children <4 years compared with older children who were operated on for suspected appendicitis. Method. 122 children, between 1 and 14 years, operated on with appendectomy for suspected appendicitis, were retrospectively analyzed. The cohort was divided into two age groups: ≥4 years () and <4 years (). Results. The mean PAS was lower among the younger compared with the older patients (5.3 and 6.6, resp.; ), despite the fact that younger children had more severe appendicitis (75.0% and 33.3%, resp.; ). PAS had low sensitivity in both groups, with a significantly lower sensitivity among the younger patients. Parent and doctor delay were confirmed in children <4 years of age with appendicitis. PAS did not aid in patients with doctor delay. Parameters in patient history, symptoms, and abdominal examination were more diffuse in younger children. Conclusion. PAS should be used with caution when examining children younger than 4 years of age. Diffuse symptoms in younger children with acute appendicitis lead to delay and to later diagnosis and more complicated appendicitis.
    Surgery Research and Practice. 12/2014; 2014.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Analyses of risk factors associated with surgical site infections (SSIs) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) have been limited. Especially, the association of an underweight body mass index (BMI) with SSIs has not been clearly defined. This study aimed to identify the impact of underweight BMI in predicting SSIs after LA.
    Yonsei medical journal. 11/2014; 55(6):1611-6.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Still, right lower abdominal pain comprises a clinical enigma in many of the cases presenting to the emergency Department .This study was proposed to assess the accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of fertile female patients with acute right lower abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis. Sixty consecutive patients, 9 of them (15%) were pregnant, underwent MRI of the lower abdomen and pelvis followed by laparoscopic exploration by a surgeon that is not aware of MRI results. After laparoscopic exploration, the surgeon put down his diagnosis then MRI results were noted. If appendicitis was the final diagnosis laparoscopic appendicectomy would proceed. All specimens were sent for pathological assessment. Patients were followed up for 2 months. MRI diagnosis of appendicitis was made in 47 patients (78.3 %). Biopsy confirmed appendicitis was diagnosed in 48 patients (80%). Prospective interpretation of MRI images yielded a sensitivity of 97.9% and a specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. There was one false negative scan. Without MRI signs of acute appendicitis, other pathology was established in 10 of 13 patients. The study found that MRI could give an accurate diagnosis in both fertile and pregnant female patients suffering acute right lower abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis. Freedom of contrast or ionizing radiation exposure is considered a great advantage especially in pregnant females where surgical intervention could threaten fetal preservation. Key words: Acute appendicitis imaging, magnetic resonance imaging in acute abdomen, acute abdomen in fertile females.

Full-text

Download
1 Download
Available from