Hip fracture incidence among the old and very old: a population-based study of 745,435 cases.

Division of Biostatistics/Clinical Epidemiology, Medical College, Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 08/1990; 80(7):871-3. DOI: 10.1016/0022-4375(91)90022-N
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Data were obtained from the Health Care Financing Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs (formerly called Veterans Administration) on all hospital discharges among the elderly population from 1984 through 1987 and combined with census estimates to calculate incidence rates of hip fracture for the elderly population of the United States. Rates for White women were the highest, reaching 35.4 per 1,000 per year among 95 year-olds. Comparably, White men, Black women, and Black men experienced similar age-related increases in risk, although of less magnitude and relatively less rate of change, respectively.

Download full-text


Available from: Toni P. Miles, Jul 07, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hip fracture represents the most dramatic expression of the disease, in terms of morbidity, medical cost and mortality. The incidence of hip fracture increases substantially with age. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between gender and geriatric rehabilitation outcome after traumatic hip fracture. Ninety-nine community-dwelling elderly patients (older than 65 years), 64 women and 35 men, who were admitted to geriatric rehabilitation after operated hip fracture were studied. We assessed the patients' clinical and demographic data, preoperative risk (ASA), type of fracture and orthopedic repair, pain intensity (VAS), cognitive (MMSE), mood (Zung IDS), and functional status (FIM) on admission and at the end of geriatric rehabilitation. Men had higher mean number of comorbid conditions at the time of the fracture. Men recovered more from depressed mood in comparison with women during the rehabilitation. Significant improvement in FIM motor subscore on discharge was found in both groups. The FIM motor subscore gain was higher in men (24.47) in comparison with women (19.22, p=0.036). Those differences were demonstrated in mean subscores of transfers (p=0.004), and locomotion (p=0.019). Women were more functionally dependent in locomotion, transfers and sphincter control. There were no differences between the groups by duration on rehabilitation stay. Recovery after hip fracture depends in large part on the pre-fracture health and functional ability of the patient. Gender differences in functional recovery may affect therapeutic and rehabilitative decision making. Functional recovery after traumatic hip fracture was better in men in comparison with women.
    Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 04/2009; 50(1):86-91. DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2009.02.004 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hip fractures are the most devastating result of osteoporosis and are common worldwide. Based on an exponential increase in incidence with age, many studies in the 1990s forecasted an epidemic of hip fracture in women in the next 15 years which is not currently being observed. Despite the ageing of the populations, accurate description of hip fracture incidence in women aged 85 or older are scarce. All women aged 60 to 95, living in the Rhône-Alpes area of France, who were admitted to hospitals during 2001-2004 for treatment of hip fracture were selected from the French claims databases. An exponential model was tested to describe the increase in hip fracture incidence in women aged 60-84 and 60-95. The first model was used to predict annual hip fracture incidence in women aged 85-95 in the Rhône-Alpes area, in France and in Europe. An exponential model was adequate to describe the increase in incidence in women aged 60-84. Assuming an exponential increase in incidence in women aged 85-95, the predicted number of cases was overestimated by 70% in the Rhône-Alpes. In France and in Europe, the excess number of incident cases is believed to be respectively 16,000 and 85,965 a year. The age-specific incidence estimates an average risk although the individual risks are heterogeneous throughout the population. The slower increase in incidence after age 85 might not be related to a decreasing individual risk with age but rather might indicate that women at higher risk have already experienced hip fracture or have died. After age 85, women who are still at risk may represent a population with a lower risk of hip fracture. Models adapted to the elderly population should be developed to improve the accuracy of predictions and optimise the health care system.
    Bone 12/2007; 41(5):896-900. DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2007.06.020 · 4.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is a major clinical problem in older women and men. Almost any bone can fracture as a result of the increased bone fragility of osteoporosis. These fractures are associated with higher health care costs, physical disability, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Because the incidence of osteoporotic fracture increases with advancing age, measures to diagnose and prevent osteoporosis and its complications assume a major public health concern. BMD is a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for fracture, to make therapeutic decisions, and to monitor therapy. Several other modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for osteoporosis have also been identified. Treatment of potentially modifiable risk factors along with exercise and calcium and vitamin D supplementation forms an important adjunct to pharmacologic management of osteoporosis. Improved household safety can reduce the risk of falls. Hip protectors have been found to be effective in nursing home population. The pharmacologic options include bisphosphonates, HRT, SERMs and calcitonin. PTH had received FDA advisory committee approval. Alendronate has been approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men, and other treatments for men are under evaluation.
    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 09/2002; 18(3):529-55. DOI:10.1016/S0749-0690(02)00022-8 · 3.19 Impact Factor