Article

Comparison of two surgical procedures for reduction of mandibular angle fracture

Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal 01/2010; 30.

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine various post operative complications associated with two surgical procedures used for reduction of mandibular angle fractures. A Quasi-Experimental study was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore. The study was carried from 30th April 2006 30th April 2007 on sixty patients with mandibular fractures. They were divided in to two categories. Thirty patients were treated by intra oral approach (group A) and thirty by extra oral approach (group B). At different intervals of their post operative visits, these patients were evaluated for post operative complications of infection, nerve damage, hypertrophic scar, esthetic dissatisfaction, malocclusion and limitation in mouth opening. 20% of the patients treated with extraoral approach presented with post operative nerve damage and no patient treated by intra oral approach had nerve damage (p=0.02). Similarly postoperative esthetic dissatisfaction was present in only 6.67% of the patients treated with intraoral approach as compared to 63.33% patients treated with extraoral approach (p=0.00). Based on this study intra oral approach is considered as more suitable method for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
105 Views
  • Pak Oral & Dent. 01/2002; 22:151-52.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mandible being the only mobile bone of the facial skeleton plays a major role in mastication, speech and deglutition. Among the maxillofacial trauma, mandible is the high risk exponent. Its fractures result in severe loss of function and disfigurement. The increased vehicular accidents, conditions of our roads and other assaults have focused attention in recent years to prevent injuries. A descriptive case series of 126 patients with mandibular fractures attending a tertiary referral centre over a six-month period is presented. Data concerning the patients' demographics, aetiology and pattern were obtained and analysed. Approximately 56% of the patients sustained fractures from road traffic accidents and 34% of the fractures occurred in the 21-30 year age range. There was a male preponderance with a male to female ratio of 9:1. Parasymphyseal fractures were the most common followed by those of the condylar and subcondylar regions. We need to encourage further research work in this field to provide better record keeping and quality of services to the injured people. Amendments in the traffic rules and legislation about seat-belt usage and traditional kite flying to reduce frequency of fractures are required.
    Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC 15(2):12-4.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A five-year review of nine hundred and eighty maxillofacial injuries seen and treated at the Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia is presented. The dominant age group range was 21-30 years. There were almost twice as many maxillary fractures as mandibular fractures. The most common aetiology was road traffic accidents (RTA), followed by sport traumas. Facial lacerations and contusions followed by neurologic and orthopaedic injuries were the most common concomitant injuries.
    African journal of medicine and medical sciences 12/1996; 25(4):385-7.

Full-text

Download
2 Downloads
Available from
Nov 11, 2014