Article

A follow-up of chronic patients committed to outpatient treatment.

North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695.
Hospital & community psychiatry 02/1989; 40(1):52-9. DOI: 10.1176/ps.40.1.52
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Data collected in a statewide study of psychiatric patients involved in civil commitment hearings in North Carolina were used to evaluate the effectiveness of outpatient commitment as a less restrictive alternative to involuntary hospitalization. Six months after the commitment hearings, outcome data for patients who were committed to outpatient treatment were compared with outcome data for patients who were released and patients who were involuntarily hospitalized. All three groups comprised patients who were chronically mentally ill, had previously been hospitalized, and had histories of medication refusal and dangerousness. Patients who were committed to outpatient treatment were significantly more likely than patients with the other two dispositions to utilize aftercare services and to continue in treatment.

0 Followers
 · 
49 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El tratamiento ambulatorio involuntario (TAI) pretende mejorar la adhesión al tratamiento y, por tanto, prevenir el deterioro de las personas con enfermedad mental grave y el peligro para sí mismas y los demás. Además de las posiciones manifestadas a favor y en contra con la introducción del TAI, los estudios publicados en la literatura médica obtienen también resultados contradictorios. La mayoría de los estudios observacionales encuentran una mejoría de los pacientes; sin embargo, las limitaciones metodológicas disminuyen la confianza en los resultados. Se han publicado 2 estudios aleatorizados en los que sólo se encuentra mejoría cuando la medida involuntaria se acompaña de servicios comunitarios de seguimiento intensivo. En este artículo se hace una revisión sobre el tema del TAI, incluida la situación actual en España.
    10/2006; 13(5):183-187. DOI:10.1016/S1134-5934(06)75360-X
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Involuntary outpatient treatment (IOT) aims to ensure adherence to therapy in patients with serious mental disease who are unaware of their illness and for whom treatment discontinuation carries a high risk of relapse. To evaluate the effectiveness of IOT in preventing relapse among patients with serious mental disease. A retrospective observational study was carried out on all of the patients (n=140) receiving IOT in the city of Valencia, Spain. Hospital service uses (emergency care, admissions and mean stay times) during the 12months before and after the introduction of IOT were compared. Patients with schizophrenia, delusional disorder or schizoaffective disorder showed a significant reduction in the number of admissions and days spent in the psychiatry ward during the year of IOT. The reduction in the number of visits to the emergency department was only significant for the patients with schizophrenia. We conclude that involuntary outpatient treatment may be effective for patients with serious mental disease who are unaware of their illness and for whom treatment discontinuation carries a high risk of relapse.
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 11/2013; 37(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.021 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studied a sample of 727 civil commitment candidates both in and out of the hospital for 6 mo following their postcourt hearings to determine their postcourt dangerousness. Dangerousness was measured by dividing it into 5 legal components of behavior: type, object, frequency, weapon/means, and severity of outcome. Using data from ward charts, readmission evaluations, recommitment affidavits, and arrest and community mental health center records, Ss' dangerousness is described in terms of those 5 components. Dangerousness was also compared with the alleged dangerous behavior that brought Ss into the civil commitment process. Candidates apparently do not tend to be dangerous in the 6 mo following their court hearings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    Law and Human Behavior 01/1990; 14(6):551. DOI:10.1007/BF01044881 · 2.16 Impact Factor