Article

Lisinopril versus slow-release nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a multicentre study. The Cooperative Study Group.

Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
Journal of Human Hypertension (Impact Factor: 2.82). 07/1989; 3 Suppl 1:29-33.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The antihypertensive effects of lisinopril 20 mg once daily and slow-release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily were compared in a double-blind, parallel group, 10-week study involving 274 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. During the first 6 weeks of treatment, slow-release nifedipine and lisinopril produced similar reductions in lying and standing blood pressure (BP), except for lying systolic BP (SBP) which was reduced to a greater extent by lisinopril. After 6 weeks of double-blind treatment, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily was added if BP remained uncontrolled (lying DBP greater than or equal to 95 mmHg); a significantly greater proportion of patients in the nifedipine group than in the lisinopril group required additional diuretic treatment (29% versus 14%, respectively; P = 0.005). Moreover, after a further 4 weeks of treatment BP was adequately controlled (lying DBP less than 95 mmHg) in significantly more lisinopril-treated patients than in the nifedipine group (91.4% versus 78.3%, respectively; P = 0.006). Lisinopril was better tolerated than slow-release nifedipine. The frequency of drug-related events was significantly lower (threefold) for lisinopril than for nifedipine (P = 0.001) and the number of withdrawals from treatment with nifedipine was more than three times that in the lisinopril treatment group (P = 0.009). Lisinopril appears to provide an effective once-daily antihypertensive treatment which is at least as effective as, and better tolerated than, slow-release nifedipine.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
43 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme lisinopril were compared with those of the calcium antagonist nifedipine in 162 non-insulin-dependent diabetic hypertensive patients for a 24-week period. In 83 and 79 patients, respectively, lisinopril and slow-release nifedipine produced similar reductions in blood pressure (systolic/diastolic: –16/–13 mmHg supine and –14/–11 mmHg standing after lisinopril; –15/–12 mmHg supine and –14/–11 mmHg standing after nifedipine). Fasting and post-prandial plasma glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin and plasma lipids appeared to be unaffected by either agent. Also, 28% of the patients on lisinopril and 30% of those on nifedipine presented microalbuminuria. Both drugs induced a reduction in the albumin excretion rate (AER). The geometric meanxx: tolerance factor of the reduction in AER among the 23 microalbuminuric patients on lisinopril (–10.0xx:1.3 g/min) was greater, though not significantly so, than that observed in the 26 on nifedipine (–0.9x:1.2 g/min). Moreover, lisinopril appeared to be better tolerated than nifedipine in our study population. Microalbuminuria is an important risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients as well as in the general population. To what extent a reduction in the AER could ameliorate the cardiovascular prognosis in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients is, at present, unknown. Finally, both lisinopril and nifedipine showed a similar antihypertensive effect in these patients which was not associated with significant differences in plasma glucose, insulin or lipid concentrations. The clinical consequences of the insignificant differences in AER remain unclear.
    Acta Diabetologica 01/1995; 32(3):203-208. · 4.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nifedipine antagonises influx of calcium through cell membrane slow channels, and sustained release formulations of the calcium channel blocker have been shown to be effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and both stable and variant angina pectoris. Preliminary findings also indicate that these formulations are effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and hypertension in pregnancy, and that they reduce the frequency of ischaemic episodes in some patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. The exact mechanism of action of nifedipine in all of these disorders has not been defined. However, its potent peripheral and coronary arterial dilator properties, together with improvements in oxygen supply/demand, are of particular importance. A major goal of sustained release therapy is to permit reductions in the frequency of nifedipine administration, preferably to once daily, and thus improve patient compliance. Two new once-daily formulations--the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and a fixed combination capsule comprising sustained release nifedipine 20 mg and atenolol 50 mg--have exhibited marked antihypertensive efficacy. The GITS preparation has also been used effectively in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, and both formulations appear to be well tolerated. Sustained release nifedipine formulations are generally better tolerated than their conventionally formulated counterparts, particularly with regard to reflex tachycardia. Adverse effects seem to be dose related, are mainly associated with the drug's potent vasodilatory action, and include headache, flushing and dizziness. Generally, these effects are mild to moderate in severity and transient, usually diminishing with continued treatment. Thus, sustained release nifedipine formulations are useful and established cardiovascular therapeutic agents which have demonstrable efficacy in various forms of angina, mild to moderate hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Further, promising results shown by the nifedipine GITS formulation, with its advantage of once daily administration suggest that it is likely to become one of the preferred nifedipine formulations for the treatment of hypertension and the various forms of angina.
    Drugs 06/1991; 41(5):737-79. · 4.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lisinopril has been compared with slow-release nifedipine in a 16-week double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study involving 102 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced 6 and 5 mm Hg more by lisinopril than by nifedipine over 12 weeks monotherapy.
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 01/1994; 46(6):487-489. · 2.74 Impact Factor