Article

Encoding of nociceptive thermal stimuli by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in humans.

Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Journal of Neurophysiology (Impact Factor: 3.04). 12/1989; 62(5):1028-38.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT 1. It has previously been shown that, in normal humans, heterotopic painful thermal conditioning stimuli induce parallel increase in the thresholds of a spinal nociceptive flexion reflex (RIII reflex) and the concurrent sensation of pain elicited by electrical stimulation of the sural nerve. On the basis of analogous animal studies, we proposed that such phenomena could be related to diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC), which have been described in the rat. The present study, which was carried out on normal volunteer subjects, was particularly concerned with the extent and temporal characteristics of the depressive effects of DNIC triggered by painful thermal stimuli on RIII reflex activity. In addition, because it was possible that these depressive effects could have resulted from a direct postsynaptic inhibition of motoneurons, a second part of the study was aimed at determining whether or not the heterotopic noxious thermal stimuli also affected the excitability of alpha-motoneurons, as monitored by the monosynaptic Hoffmann reflex (H reflex) technique. 2. In the 11 subjects under study, application of moderate, nonnoxious temperatures (40-44 degree C) to the contralateral hand (via a thermoregulated and agitated waterbath) did not modify the RIII reflex nor the associated sensation of pain. By contrast noxious temperatures clearly depressed the RIII reflex and the concurrent sensation of pain, both during and after the conditioning procedure (CP), in a direct linear relationship to the temperature of the waterbath in the 45-47 degree C range; the maximal depressive effect was observed with the highest conditioning temperature. A significant relationship was also found between the extent of the RIII depression during the CP and that during a 10-min period of post-CP observation. 3. The depressive effects observed on both the RIII reflex and pain were not associated with clear change in autonomic functions. Respiration remained stable during the sessions, with no significant relationship between the temperatures of the waterbath and respiratory rate. Heart rate was slightly but significantly increased during the immersion of the hand in the 46 or 47 degree C waterbaths; this increase, however, ceased with the end of CP. 4. Application of thermal conditioning stimuli produced a slight but nonsignificant increase of the monosynaptic H reflex during the first minute of CP, no matter what was the temperature of the waterbath. However, there were no subsequent variations during the 6-min period of post-CP observation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1 Bookmark
 · 
97 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is an experimental approach for probing endogenous analgesia by which one painful stimulus (the conditioning stimulus) may inhibit the perceived pain of a subsequent stimulus (the test stimulus). Animal studies suggest that CPM is mediated by a spino-bulbo-spinal loop using objective measures such as neuronal firing. In humans, pain ratings are often used as the end point. Because pain self-reports are subject to cognitive influences, we tested whether cognitive factors would impact on CPM results in healthy humans. We conducted a within-subject, crossover study of healthy adults to determine the extent to which CPM is affected by 1) threatening and reassuring evaluation and 2) imagery alone of a cold conditioning stimulus. We used a heat stimulus individualized to 5/10 on a visual analog scale as the testing stimulus and computed the magnitude of CPM by subtracting the postconditioning rating from the baseline pain rating of the heat stimulus. We found that although evaluation can increase the pain rating of the conditioning stimulus, it did not significantly alter the magnitude of CPM. We also found that imagery of cold pain alone did not result in statistically significant CPM effect. Our results suggest that CPM is primarily dependent on sensory input, and that the cortical processes of evaluation and imagery have little impact on CPM. These findings lend support for CPM as a useful tool for probing endogenous analgesia through subcortical mechanisms.
    Journal of Pain Research 01/2014; 7:689-697. DOI:10.2147/JPR.S65607
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the this study was to investigate the combined effects of heterosegmental non-noxious and noxious stimulation on electrically induced tooth pain. The late component of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP), induced by electrical tooth stimulation and pain intensity, were examined under electrical stimulation to forearms. Noxious, non-noxious, and combined non-noxious and noxious electrical stimulation were applied to median nerves on the forearms. Four experimental sessions (ie, control session, combined non-noxious and noxious stimulation session, non-noxious stimulation session, and noxious stimulation session were performed for each subject at each 10-minute interval for 30 minutes. The amplitudes of the SEP and VAS scores in the combined stimulation session decreased significantly compared with those in the control session and the reduction rates were 51.1% (13.4 μV) and 41.0% (23.5 mm), respectively. These results show that the combined stimulation has a more potent analgesic effect than that of either the non-noxious or the noxious stimulation. It is suggested that a potent analgesia was produced by an activated central mechanism, including endogenous opioid and descending pain inhibitory systems due to combined non-noxious and noxious stimulation. © 2014 World Institute of Pain.
    Pain Practice 12/2014; DOI:10.1111/papr.12265 · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text

Download
7 Downloads
Available from
Aug 17, 2014