Article
Nexttoleading order QCD corrections to Z boson pair production via vectorboson fusion
Physical Review D (Impact Factor: 4.69). 05/2006; DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.113006
Source: arXiv

Article: Monte Carlo Generators for the LHC
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The status of two Monte Carlo generators, HELACPHEGAS, a program for multijet processes and VBFNLO, a parton level program for vector boson fusion processes at NLO QCD, is briefly presented. The aim of these tools is the simulation of events within the Standard Model at current and future high energy experiments, in particular the LHC. Some results related to the production of multijet final states at the LHC are also shown.Acta Physica Polonica Series B 11/2007; · 1.01 Impact Factor  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We discuss results for diboson plus two jets production processes at the LHC at NLO QCD. Issues related to the scale choice are reviewed. We focus on the distributions of the invariant mass and rapidity separation of the two hardest jets and show, for $W^\pm \gamma jj$ and $Z\gamma jj$ production, how the contribution from the radiative decays of the massive gauge bosons can be significantly reduced.10/2014; 
Article: Nexttoleading order QCD corrections to W+Wgamma and ZZgamma production with leptonic decays
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The computation of the O(alphas) QCD corrections to the cross sections for W+Wgamma and ZZgamma production in hadronic collisions is presented. We consider the case of a real photon in the final state, but include full leptonic decays of the W and Z bosons. Numerical results for the LHC and the Tevatron are obtained through a fully flexible parton level Monte Carlo program based on the structure of the VBFNLO program, allowing an easy implementation of arbitrary cuts and distributions. We show the dependence on scale variations of the integrated cross sections and provide evidence that nexttoleading order (NLO) QCD corrections strongly modify the LO predictions for observables at the LHC both in magnitude and in shape.Physical Review D 01/2010; 81. · 4.69 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.