Right-handed Dirac Neutrinos in $\nu e^{-}$ Scattering and Azimuthal Asymmetry in Recoil Electron Event Rates

M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, PL-30-059, Kraków, Poland
European Physical Journal C (Impact Factor: 5.08). 05/2003; 32. DOI: 10.1140/epjcd/s2003-01-012-6
Source: arXiv


In this paper a scenario with the participation of the exotic scalar S,
tensor T and pseudoscalar couplings of the right-handed neutrinos in addition
to the standard vector V, axial A couplings of the left-handed neutrinos in the
low-energy $(\nu_{\mu}e^{-})$ and $(\nu_{e}e^{-})$ scattering processes is
considered. Neutrinos are assumed to be massive Dirac fermions and to be
polarized. Both reactions are studied at the level of the four-fermion point
interaction. The main goal is to show that the physical consequence of the
presence of the right-handed neutrinos is an appearance of the azimuthal
asymmetry in the angular distribution of the recoil electrons caused by the
non-vanishing interference terms between the standard and exotic couplings,
proportional to the transverse neutrino polarization vector. The upper limits
on the expected effect of this asymmetry for the low-energy neutrinos $(E_{\nu}
< 1 MeV)$ are found. We also show that if the neutrino helicity rotation
$(\nu_{eL} \to \nu_{eR})$ in the solar magnetic field takes place, the similar
effect of the azimuthal asymmetry of the recoil electrons scattered by the
solar neutrinos should be observed. This effect would also come from the
interference terms between the standard $(V, A)_{L}$ and exotic $(S, T, P)_{R}$
couplings. New-type neutrino detectors with good angular resolution could
search for the azimuthal asymmetry in event number.

Download full-text


Available from: Marcin Misiaszek, Oct 21, 2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The signal produced in neutrino observatories by the pair-annihilation neutrinos emitted from a 20 M⊙ pre-supernova star at the silicon burning phase is estimated. The spectrum of the neutrinos with an average energy ∼2 MeV is calculated with the use of the Monte Carlo method. A few relevant reactions for neutrinos and anti-neutrinos in modern detectors are considered. The most promising results are from reaction. During the Si-burning phase we expect 1.27 neutrons/day/kton of water to be produced by neutrinos from a star located at a distance of 1 kpc. Small admixture of effective neutron-absorbers as e.g. NaCl or GdCl3 makes these neutrons easily visible because of Cherenkov light produced by electrons which were hit by ∼8 MeV photon cascade emitted by Cl or Gd nuclei. The estimated rate of neutron production for SNO and Super-Kamiokande is, respectively, 2.2 and 41 events per day for a star at 1 kpc. For future detectors UNO and Hyper-Kamiokande we expect 5.6 and 6.9 events per day even for a star 10 kpc away. This would make it possible to foresee a massive star death a few days before its core collapse. Importance of such a detection for theoretical astrophysics is discussed.
    Astroparticle Physics 06/2004; 21(3-21):303-313. DOI:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2004.02.002 · 3.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quantum-mechanical calculations of transitions dynamics between the left- and right-handed helicity states of the atmospheric muon Dirac neutrino,which has a gravitoelectrical dipole moment (GEDM) interacting with the gravitational field of the Earth have been carried out. It is shown that the asymmetry of the zenith-angle distribution of an atmospheric muon neutrino can be explained by the interference of two mutually perpendicular plain-wave neutrino states having different velocites inside the Earth in the presence of its gravitation field. The deficit of the solar neutrino can also be explained by the electron neutrino helicity flip transition due to the interaction of its GEDM with the gravitation field of the Sun. The characteristic mass for the gravitational dipole of the neutral and charged leptons have been estimated.
    Physics Essays 08/2004; 21(2). DOI:10.4006/1.3010386 · 0.25 Impact Factor