The exclamative sentence type in English

In book: Conceptual structure, discourse and language, Publisher: CSLI, Editors: Adele E. Goldberg, pp.375-389
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bakhtin tells us that speech genres organize speech similar to the way that grammatical forms do. This essay takes Bakhtin at his word, and it explores the way this idea works out in one contemporary theory of grammar. The essay draws an analogy between the way rhetoricians have considered generic form in action-based theories of genre and the formal idiom constructions—i.e. form-meaning-function complexes—of construction grammar. It concludes that the constructional analogy provides a clear empirical guide for discussion of generic form that is both shared and unique and stable and unstable, in addition to facts regarding the learning and acquisition of generic form.
    Language & Communication 10/2010; 30(4):211-224. DOI:10.1016/j.langcom.2010.01.002 · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article argues that subject auxiliary inversion in English (SAI) provides an example of a syntactic generalization that is strongly motivated by a family of closely related functions. Recognition of the functional properties of each subconstruction associated with SAI allows us to predict many seemingly arbi- trary properties of SAI: e.g., its (partial) restriction to appear in main clauses, the fact that the inversion only involves the first auxiliary, and the fact that its use in comparatives is more limited. The dominant feature of SAI, being non- positive,is also arguedto motivate the syntacticform of SAI. It is suggestedthat attention to the rich data inherent in language and to findings in categorization research simultaneously serves to reinforce and benefit our understanding of both language and categorization more generally.
    The Linguistic Review 01/2005; 22:411-428. DOI:10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.411 · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most frameworks of linguistic analysis tend to highlight phenomena of language use and/or language knowledge such as sentence and word structure, while backgrounding or ignoring other phenomena that are interpreted as being of more marginal interest for the linguist. The main goal of this paper is to argue that some phenomena that have previously been treated as being more peripheral play an important role in the organization of linguistic discourse, and that the latter operates in at least two different domains, namely that of sentence grammar and of thetical grammar. Each of the two domains has its own internal structure, and the two tend to be separated from one another syntactically, prosodically, and semantically. Building on recent research, the paper aims at defining the main characteristics of thetical grammar.
    Studies in Language 12/2010; 35(4):852-897. DOI:10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal · 0.54 Impact Factor