Article

High dose intravenous methotrexate with leucovorin rescue in rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthritis and Rheumatism Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, MD.
The Journal of Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 3.26). 03/1988; 15(2):251-5.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Five patients with severe, treatment refractory rheumatoid arthritis were treated with high dose intravenous methotrexate (500 mg/m2) followed by leucovorin (50 mg/m2). Four courses of chemotherapy were given over a 2-month interval. At the end of the final course, there was a 50% or greater improvement in joint swelling and pain indices and morning stiffness in all patients. Clinical responses persisted for 6-14 weeks posttherapy. High dose methotrexate-leucovorin was associated with a significant reduction in DR antigen expression on peripheral Leu 2, Leu 3 and Leu 4 lymphocytes.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
96 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty-seven patients with highly active, refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with the new anti-rheumatic drug prospidine, in view of selecting the optimum pulse regimen and comparing its short-term use with methotrexate (MTX). Prospidine was administered intravenously 500 mg every 3-5 days in the hospital and then monthly. Fifteen patients received MTX (30 mg/week intravenously in hospital and then monthly. Fifteen patients received MTX (30 mg/week intravenously in hospital and then orally 7.5-15 mg/week). The randomisation code was 2:1. We assessed 7 clinical and 4 lab data. The clinical improvement was noticed statistically after 2-4 weeks in 85% prospidine-patients and sustained up to 6 months in 73% (cp. 40% and 57% by the MTX). Only in the prospidine patients were a significant reduction of the mean daily prednisolone dose and the levels of rheumatoid factor and immune complexes observed. Prospidine and MTX had a similar incidence of side effects (39% and 43%), but all drop-outs in prospidine pulse were due to lack of response (26%) and to initial intolerance (4%). Drop-outs in MTX pulse were connected both with drug toxicity (14%) and with lack of response (7%). Alternate prospidine pulse, as highly anti-inflammatory, rapidly acting and well-tolerated regimen, may be used in treating severe forms of RA.
    Clinical Rheumatology 04/1994; 13(1):54-9. · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the clinical usefulness of 2 novel therapies for treatment-resistant myositis. Thirty patients with refractory myositis, of whom 25 had an inadequate or no response to previous cytotoxic therapy, were randomized to begin either a combination of weekly oral methotrexate and daily azathioprine (MTX/AZA) or intravenous methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (I.V. MTX) every 2 weeks for 6 months. Crossover to the alternate therapy occurred according to defined rules; evaluations of muscle strength and functional abilities were performed at the beginning, and after 3 and 6 months, of each treatment. Of the 15 patients initially randomized to oral MTX/AZA, 8 improved with oral therapy and 1 improved with I.V. MTX during the crossover period. Of the 15 patients initially randomized to I.V. MTX therapy, 3 improved with the I.V. therapy and 4 with the oral combination during the crossover period. Although the study lacked the power to directly compare both treatments, intention-to-treat analysis showed a trend in favor of those patients who first received oral combination therapy (P = 0.025). There were 0.09 adverse events per patient-month with oral combination therapy and 0.16 per patient-month with I.V. therapy (P = 0.09). Combination oral MTX/AZA may benefit patients with treatment-resistant myositis, including those who previously had inadequate responses to either MTX or AZA alone. I.V. MTX with leucovorin rescue may also benefit some patients with refractory myositis.
    Arthritis & Rheumatology 03/1998; 41(3):392-9. · 7.48 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether the side effects of methotrexate can be decreased by the concurrent use of leucovorin, without affecting the efficacy of the methotrexate. We conducted a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of leucovorin administration, 2.5-5.0 mg orally, to be given 24 hours after the single, weekly, oral dose of methotrexate. Every 3 weeks for 52 weeks, patients were evaluated for rheumatic disease activity and side effects. Dosage adjustments for both methotrexate and leucovorin were made as needed, according to a defined protocol. The primary outcome evaluated was the frequency of study withdrawals because of side effects and/or inefficacy. Secondary outcomes evaluated included the frequency of side effects and the relative efficacy of methotrexate in the leucovorin and placebo treatment groups. Ninety-two evaluable patients were analyzed (44 took leucovorin and 48 placebo). Twenty-two patients withdrew early because of side effects unresponsive to our protocol, and 1 because of inefficacy; 17 had been taking placebo and 6 had been taking leucovorin (35% versus 14%, P < 0.02). The number of visits during which side effects were reported was reduced by almost 50% in the leucovorin treatment group (P < 0.001). There were significant reductions in the frequencies of all common side effects. At 52 weeks, disease activity was similar in both patient groups. The methotrexate-leucovorin protocol used significantly reduces common side effects of methotrexate therapy without significantly altering efficacy.
    Arthritis & Rheumatology 06/1993; 36(6):795-803. · 7.48 Impact Factor

J Shiroky