An experimental flexor tendon repair in zone II that allows immediate postoperative mobilization.

Department of Orthopaedics, JHM Health Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
The Journal Of Hand Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.66). 08/1987; 12(4):582-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80212-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT An experimental method of approximating severed flexor tendons in zone II that allows immediate postoperative mobilization is described. The repair uses a nonabsorbable suture anchored into the severed tendon in zone III. This experimental repair was performed on one foot in each of 18 adult, white Leghorn chickens. The control side used the modified Kessler technique to repair the zone II laceration. The animals were prevented from weight-bearing activities but were allowed active motion of the foot for 5 to 6 weeks postoperatively. The results demonstrated a marked diminution in flexor tendon adhesions, with intrinsic tendon collagen formation serving to reconstitute tendon continuity on the experimental side. The breaking strengths of the two repair methods were equivalent. These results suggest that this method may allow primary repair of tendon injuries in zone II, with minimal formation of adhesions.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to determine the effects of frequency and duration of controlled passive motion on the healing flexor tendon following primary repair. Adult mongrel dogs were divided into two groups based on frequency of controlled passive motion. In one group, motion was applied manually at a frequency of 12 cycles/min for 5 min/day; in the other group, a continuous passive motion machine was used to apply motion at a lower frequency of 1 cycle/min for 60 min/day, making the number of cycles each day for both groups identical. Gliding function and tensile properties of repaired tendons were evaluated biomechanically at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Results showed that gliding function in both groups was similar, but tensile properties, as represented by linear slope, ultimate load, and energy absorption, were significantly improved in the higher frequency group. It was concluded that frequency of controlled passive motion rehabilitation is a significant factor in accelerating the healing response following tendon repair, and higher frequency-controlled passive motion has a beneficial effect.
    Journal of Orthopaedic Research 09/1991; 9(5):705-13. DOI:10.1002/jor.1100090510 · 2.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a prospective study, 114 patients with 138 zone 2 flexor tendon injuries were treated over a three-year period. Early active mobilisation of the injured fingers was commenced within 48 hours of surgery. 98 patients (86%) were reviewed at least six months after operation. Using the grading system recommended by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, the active range of motion recovered was graded excellent or good in 77% of digits, fair in 14% and poor in 9%. Dehisence of the repair occurred in 11 digits (9.4%) and in these an immediate re-repair followed by a similar programme of early active mobilisation resulted in an excellent or good outcome in seven digits.
    The Journal of Hand Surgery British & European Volume 12/1989; 14(4):383-91. DOI:10.1016/0266-7681(89)90152-6 · 0.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report a prospective study of dynamic splintage following extensor tendon repair. Eighty-four patients with 101 extensor tendon injuries were studied. Using Dargan's evaluation system, there were 97% excellent results for the thumb and 93% excellent and good results for the fingers. The average total active motions were 107 degrees for thumbs and 245 degrees for fingers. Over 80% of patients regained good power grip. Patients with associated digital fractures or with ragged lacerations had poorer results. Overall, we found that dynamic splintage was a satisfactory method after extensor repair.
    The Journal of Hand Surgery British & European Volume 05/1997; 22(2):283-7. DOI:10.1016/S0266-7681(97)80084-8 · 0.04 Impact Factor