Social Support in Patients?? and Husbands?? Adjustment to Breast Cancer

Department of Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202.
Nursing Research (Impact Factor: 1.5). 01/1988; 37(2):91-5. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-198803000-00008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Data were obtained from 50 mastectomy patients and their husbands at 3 days and 30 days postsurgery to determine the nature of the relationship between social support and the adjustment of mastectomy patients and their husbands over time. Psychosocial adjustment was related to both patients' and husbands' levels of social support. Patients and husbands who reported higher levels of social support reported fewer adjustment difficulties at both 3 days and 30 days postsurgery. Patients and husbands differed significantly in the levels of support they perceived over time; husbands perceived less support from friends, nurses, and physicians. This study underscores the importance of assessing the support resources of both patients and husbands over time.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Examine the psychometric properties of the Appraisal of Caregiving Scale (ACS). Data were collected as part of the FOCUS Program trial in Michigan (N=484 caregivers). Exploratory factor analysis found the ACS measured Threat, General Stress, and Benefit appraisals. Cronbach's alphas for all subscales exceeded 0.70. Construct validity analyses indicated the Threat subscale correlated significantly with concepts of avoidant coping, burden, and dyadic support (r>0.30). General Stress correlated significantly with burden (r=0.348) and dyadic support (r=-0.373), and the Benefit subscale correlated significantly with active coping (r=0.444). Known group analyses indicated that depressed caregivers had higher Threat and General Stress scores than non-depressed caregivers. Also, younger caregivers reported significantly higher scores on the General Stress subscale than older caregivers. Predictive validity analyses found appraisal scores at baseline accounted for 33.3% of the variance in hopelessness and 27.8% of the variance in depression at Time 2. The ACS is a reliable measure of Threat, General Stress, and Benefit appraisals, with some support for its validity. Health professionals may find the ACS useful for guiding intervention development. Future research should continue to examine the ACS' validity. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Patient Education and Counseling 01/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.009 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies about the specific relationships’ quality with the father are scarce. The quality of Relationships Inventory – QRI proposed by Pierce, Sarason and Sarason (1991), evaluates three important dimensions of relationships perceived by the adolescent: Support, Depth and Conflict. The present research aimed to test the structure of QRI father's version (Neves & Pinheiro, 2006; Matos, Pinheiro & Marques, 2013 – Portuguese version), with a Confirmatory Factor Analysis and to study the relations between the QRI dimensions. Sample comprised 312 adolescents, 171 females and 141 males, aged between 12 and 17 (M= 13.77, DP= 1.16). The three-factor solution proposed by Pierce et al. (1991) was confirmed in this Portuguese adolescent sample. High positive associations between Support and Depth subscales, (r= .76) and low negative associations between these subscales and the Conflict subscale (r= -.13 and r= -.09) were found in the father's version of QRI. Support and Depth, in the relationship with the father, seem to be especially related to each other, presenting negative associations with Conflict. The results suggest that this instrument, with a three factor structure, can be used in future researches namely to study preventive interventions with adolescents and their families designed to diminish vulnerability to psychopathology, namely depression.
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 01/2015; 165. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.631
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Task consensus of professional carers, agreement on patients' needs and quality of life were measured in 51 newly diagnosed cancer patients, in the Netherlands. Data from patients, informal carers, general practitioners and medical specialists were obtained at baseline and 12 months later, At baseline, a substantial amount of consensus between medical specialists and general practitioners was found concerning primary responsibilities for tasks in the domains of assistance of patients and family and giving information. Less consensus was found concerning tasks on patient education. At the initial stage of disease most patients received home care within one week after hospital discharge. During the year, contacts with professional and informal carers decreased. Social support was also available, although the size of the informal network decreased during the year.
    Sociological focus 05/1997; 30(2):131-145. DOI:10.1080/00380237.1997.10570687