Prognostic value of auditory brain-stem responses for late postconcussion symptoms following minor head injury.

Department of Neurology, University of Modena, Italy.
Journal of Neurosurgery (Impact Factor: 3.23). 06/1988; 68(5):742-4. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1988.68.5.0742
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Minor head injury is frequently followed by a subjective postconcussion syndrome. Brain-stem auditory evoked responses (BAER's) were found to be pathological in different small series of patients with a postconcussion syndrome who were examined months after sustaining a slight cranial or cervical trauma; abnormal BAER's have also been reported in larger groups of patients examined early after minor head injury. A relationship between these findings and late subjective symptoms has never been demonstrated. The results of a prospective study into the value of BAER's in the prognosis of a postconcussion syndrome after minor head injury are presented. In 103 patients with minor head injury, BAER's were recorded within 48 hours of the trauma. One year later, the patients were examined for headache, dizziness, depression, anxiety, subjective loss of memory and concentration, and irritability. Eighty percent claimed at least one symptom, most often irritability (54%), memory loss (47%), or depression (39%). Pathological BAER's were found with the same prevalence in patients with and without a postconcussion syndrome. This study confirms the disturbance of brain-stem function in some head-injured patients. However, the lack of correlation with a postconcussion syndrome limits the prognostic value of BAER recordings for postconcussion syndrome. The data suggest that BAER's not be used for medicolegal evaluation of patients with a postconcussion syndrome.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), the brain undergoes numerous electrophysiologic changes. The most common techniques used to evaluate these changes include electroencepalography (EEG) and evoked potentials. In animals, EEGs immediately following TBI can show either diffuse slowing or voltage attenuation, or high voltage spiking. Following a TBI, many animals display evidence of hippocampal excitability and a reduced seizure threshold. Some mice subjected to severe TBI via a fluid percussion injury will eventually develop seizures, which provides a useful potential model for studying the neurophysiology of epileptogenesis. In humans, the EEG changes associated with mild TBI are relatively subtle and may be challenging to distinguish from EEG changes seen in other conditions. Quantitative EEG (QEEG) may enhance the ability to detect post-traumatic electrophysiologic changes following a mild TBI. Some types of evoked potential (EP) and event related potential (ERP) can also be used to detect post-traumatic changes following a mild TBI. Continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG) following moderate and severe TBI is useful in detecting the presence of seizures and status epilepticus acutely following an injury, although some seizures may only be detectable using intracranial monitoring. CEEG can also be helpful for assessing prognosis after moderate or severe TBI. EPs, particularly somatosensory evoked potentials, can also be useful in assessing prognosis following severe TBI. The role for newer technologies such as magnetoencephalography and bispectral analysis (BIS) in the evaluation of patients with TBI remains unclear. © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Handbook of Clinical Neurology 01/2015; 127:319-39. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-52892-6.00021-0
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SYNOPSISBackground: The post-concussion syndrome (PCS) and whiplash syndrome (WS) have been controversial topics among physician for many decades. There is little Information available on the opinions end practices of physicians.Method: In June of 1992, we performed a national survey by mail of the four physician groups most Commonly treating these problems. The number of respondents and response rates were as follows: family physicians, 118, 16%; neurologists, 100, 21%; neurosurgeons, 97, 23%; orthopedists, 82, 13%. The survey Instrument contained items on demographics, definitions, causation, prognosis, medico-legal aspects, testing, and treatment.Results: Only a minority of respondents believe that PCS and WS are clearly defined syndromes. A substantial minority report that psychogenic and litigation factors are most responsible for the Conditions. Most of the physicians believe that PCS and WS have a 3–6 month recovery time. A significant minority Concur that symptoms of the two syndromes resolve when litigation is settled. Most of the physicians order tests to role out pathology although a minority order tests to reassure patients or because of litigation concerns. Only a minority of respondents believe that effective treatments are available. Not surprisingly, a multitude of Conventional and unconventional treatments are sometimes recommended.Conclusions: Many aspects of PCS end WS are controversial among treating physicians. This Controversy can have a profound impact on the quality and cost of patient care. Ongoing research is required to discover more effective treatments for mild brain injury and chronic pain.
    Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain 04/1994; 34(5):268 - 274. DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.1994.hed3405268.x · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: this study aimed to characterize brain stem auditory evoked potential and long latency auditory evoked potential in patients that suffered head trauma. METHOD: transverse clinical study performed on twenty normal hearing individuals divided in two groups paired for age and gender: a) ten individuals who suffered head trauma (trauma group); and b) ten individuals with no type of neurological alteration (control group). The individuals underwent a basic hearing evaluation as well as brain stem auditory evoked potential and long latency auditory evoked potential (P300) tests. RESULTS: on the brain stem auditory evoked potential, more prolonged absolute latencies of Waves I, III and V and the I-III inter-peak interval were found in the trauma group in comparison with the control group, with statistically significant differences with regard to the absolute latencies of Waves I and III in the right ear and both Wave III and the I-III inter-peak interval in the left ear. The amplitude of Waves I, III and V in the right ear and Waves III and V in the left ear were higher in the control group. Regarding P300, the trauma group displayed greater latency and lesser amplitude in both ears comparing with the control group, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: individuals that suffered head trauma display alterations in the brain stem auditory evoked potential and do not display significant differences with regard to long latency auditory evoked potential (P300) when compared to individuals with no brain injury.
    Revista CEFAC 02/2013; 15(1):58-68. DOI:10.1590/S1516-18462011005000138