Article

Background light and the contrast gain of primate P and M retinal ganglion cells.

Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021-6399.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 07/1988; 85(12):4534-7. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4534
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Retinal ganglion cells projecting to the monkey lateral geniculate nucleus fall into two classes: those projecting to the magnocellular layers of the nucleus (M cells) have a higher contrast gain to luminance patterns at photopic levels of retinal illumination than those projecting to the parvocellular layers (P cells). We report here that this difference in luminance contrast gain between M and P cells is maintained at low levels of mean retinal illumination. In fact, our results suggest that in the mesopic and scotopic ranges of mean illumination, the M-cell/magnocellular pathway is the predominant conveyor of information about spatial contrast to the visual cortex.

Full-text

Available from: Ehud Kaplan, Apr 19, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
61 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuroimaging has had an enormous impact on the way human cognition is studied in vivo. With the advent of fMRI, scientists have been able to ask questions regarding individual differences which could not have been addressed with PET. These, are particularly important for studying developmental disorders, such as dyslexia because research suggests that participants with dyslexia (DPs) form a heterogeneous population. There are three main theories of dyslexia: the phonological (PDT), visual magnocellular (MDT) and cerebellar (CDT). The majority of neuroimaging studies, motivated by these theories, have shortcomings. First, they have relied on group comparisons which can obscure the less frequent differences between DPs and controls (CPs). Second, they mostly tested one underlying cause, postulated by one theory. Third, the majority of them focused on detecting a deficit without empirically demonstrating its relationship with reading deficit which defines this disorder. The goal of this research is to shed more light on the neural correlates of reading deficit in dyslexia and address these criticisms. First, by using a multiple case study to investigate individual differences among DPs. Such comparisons would not have been possible with PET. Second, by contrasting the predictions, of each of the main theories, on the neural correlates of the reading impairment in one sample of DPs. The behavioural studies suggest that there are subtypes of dyslexia, however, they cannot be tested by focusing on one theory. Third, by using a reading task and fMRI - which provides an opportunity for directly testing the relationship between the predictions of a given theory and the neural correlates of reading impairment. Eighteen individual DPs and 16 CPs were tested in a multiple case study. Participants were right-handed, with native English, normal vision and hearing and without clinical ADHD and DCD. To ensure that no confounds were present due to differences between a DP and CPs in IQ, handedness and age, these were entered into the analysis as covariates. The neuroimaging task involved silent reading of individual words and fixating on a cross (baseline) in an event-related design. Four findings were revealed. First, the neural correlates of reading deficit in dyslexia in all cases, except one, are consistent with the predictions of the PDT and CDT, in one case with the visual MDT and in ten cases with a hypothetical visual (not magnocellular) deficit theory; most cases are consistent with more than one theory. Second, there are considerable individual differences in the neural correlates of reading deficit. Even where they are consistent with the same theory in two DPs, the areas can differ. Third, the results reveal that the lack of deficit on a behavioural test does not mean that the neural correlates of reading are intact. Fourth, a large number of DPs who have a similar profile on the behavioural measures exhibited dissimilar profiles on the neural level. These findings suggest that endophenotypes uncovered by neuroimaging will enable researchers to find important links between the behavioural and genetic characteristics of DPs. Multidisciplinary research on individual differences, including neuroimaging, behavioural and genetic measures within a multiple-deficit model holds significant promise.
    Advances in Neuroimaging Research, Edited by Victoria Asher-Hansley, 05/2014: chapter 1: pages 1-119; Nova Science Publishers., ISBN: 978-1-63321-307-4
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The notion that Bayesian processes are fundamental to brain function and sensory processing has recently received much support, and a number of Bayesian accounts of how the brain encodes the speed of moving objects have been proposed that challenge earlier mechanistic models. We measured the perceived speed of low contrast patterns at both low (2.5 cd m(-2)) and high (25 cd m(-2)) luminance in order to assess these competing models of how the human visual system encodes speed. At both luminance levels low contrast stimuli are perceptually biased such that they appear slower at slow (< 8 Hz) speeds but faster at higher (16 Hz) speeds. However, we find that the reversal of the perceptual bias from under- to overestimation occurred at slower speeds at low luminance. We also found that the bias was greater at slow speeds at high luminance but greater at fast speeds at low luminance. Moreover, discrimination thresholds were found to be similar at high and low luminance. These findings can be predicted by models in which speed is encoded by the relative activity within two broadly tuned temporal channels but are inconsistent with Bayesian models of speed encoding. We conclude that Bayesian processes cannot adequately account for speed encoding in the human visual system. © 2015 ARVO.
    Journal of Vision 02/2015; 15(2):9. DOI:10.1167/15.2.9 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sensory processing deficits, first investigated by Kraepelin and Bleuler as possible pathophysiological mechanisms in schizophrenia, are now being recharacterized in the context of our current understanding of the molecular and neurobiological brain mechanisms involved. The National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria position these deficits as intermediaries between molecular and cellular mechanisms and clinical symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations. The prepulse inhibition of startle responses by a weaker preceding tone, the inhibitory gating of response to paired sensory stimuli characterized using the auditory P50 evoked response, and the detection of slight deviations in patterns of sensory stimulation eliciting the cortical mismatch negativity potential demonstrate deficits in early sensory processing mechanisms, whose molecular and neurobiological bases are increasingly well understood. Deficits in sensory processing underlie more complex cognitive dysfunction and are in turn affected by higher-level cognitive difficulties. These deficits are now being used to identify genes involved in familial transmission of schizophrenia and to monitor potentially therapeutic drug effects for both treatment and prevention. This research also provides a clinical reminder that patients' sensory perception of the surrounding world, even during treatment sessions, may differ considerably from others' perceptions. A person's ability to understand and interact effectively with the surrounding world ultimately depends on an underlying sensory experience of it.
    American Journal of Psychiatry 01/2015; 172(1):17-31. DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13121691 · 13.56 Impact Factor