The Impact of diabetes education and peer support upon weight and glycaemic control of elderly persons with non insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM)

American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 06/1987; 77(5):634-5. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.77.5.634
Source: PubMed


We assessed diabetes education and peer support interventions as facilitators of weight loss and glycemic control in a community sample of 79 elderly persons with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Different groups received: education only, education and peer support, and no treatment. Peer support was higher in groups where it was actively facilitated. Weight loss and reduction in level of glycemic control occurred within groups receiving both diabetes education and peer support.

Download full-text


Available from: Clara C. Pratt, Jun 21, 2014
  • Source
    • "Despite numerous hypotheses about underlying mechanisms, and a large body of evidence emphasizing the prognostic importance of social support for heart disease morbidity and mortality, there are very few published accounts of interventions specifically designed to train adults, especially women, at risk for CHD in obtaining or maintaining social support. In those that do exist (Wilson and Pratt, 1987; Chesney, 1996; Barrera et al., 2002), rarely has it been possible to identify the separate 575 influences of social support factors. This project experimentally investigated whether ongoing support group sessions over 24 months enhanced the practice and maintenance of healthful lifestyle behaviors relative to usual care. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper describes a randomized study to evaluate the effects of a comprehensive lifestyle management intervention for 279 postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes who are at elevated risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). The intervention, called the Mediterranean Lifestyle Trial, is focused on dietary factors, physical activity, social support and stress management. The Mediterranean Lifestyle Trial relies on a synthesis of Social Cognitive Theory and Social Ecologic Theory, as well as goal-systems theory, to explicitly inform the lifestyle intervention and to address maintenance. Thus, the trial should help illuminate the theoretical mechanisms responsible for lifestyle change. Primary outcome variables are dietary, stress management and physical activity behavior change, quality of life, and CHD-related biological risk factors. Hypothesized mediating variables include self-efficacy, coping, and social and environmental support. Following the initial 6-month intervention, participants in the intervention condition are randomized to one of two groups designed to enhance maintenance of effects: either a peer-led support group or a personalized multilevel community resources maintenance condition. Unlike the peer group, the personalized approach focuses on multiple levels of community resources to promote healthful lifestyle change. Because this research focuses on issues of generalization and translation to practice, the RE-AIM evaluation framework is being used to evaluate Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. This framework will help to translate research into practice by directing researchers' attention to important but seldom-investigated strategies for enhancing longer-term maintenance. Specifically, the study tests how long-term maintenance may be improved through the use of existing community resources, an intervention based on multiple environmental factors and multiple lifestyle behaviors, and lay leaders versus personalized professional support.
    Health Education Research 11/2002; 17(5):574-85. DOI:10.1093/her/17.5.574 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Therefore, subjects in this group were given no encouragement or social support during the intervention. There is evidence that social support is effective in increasing compliance with medical prescriptions and lifestyle changes such as participation in diet or exercise programs (McMurdo and Rennie, 1994;Green, 1987;Becker, 1985;Wilson and Pratt, 1987;Sluijs et al., 1993;Williams et al., 1991), although individual attention is not always sufficient in improving adherence (Fishman, 1995). A study by Perkins et al. (1986) examined the effectiveness of a structured social support program in increasing exercise in nursing home residents. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Assisted walking and walking combined with conversation were compared to a conversation-only intervention in nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease. Sixty-five subjects randomly assigned to treatment group were tested at baseline and end of treatment. Subjects' mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 10.83; mean age was 87. Treatment was given for 30 minutes three times a week for 16 weeks. Subjects in the assisted walking group declined 20.9% in functional mobility; the conversation group declined 18.8%. The combined walking and conversation treatment group declined only 2.5%. These differences in outcome were significant and appear to have been affected by differences in treatment fidelity. Subjects in the conversation treatment group completed 90% of intended treatment compared with 75% in the combined group and only 57% in the assisted walking group. Failure to treat was due to subject refusal and physical illness. The conversation component of the combined walking and conversation treatment intervention appears to have improved compliance with the intervention, thereby improving treatment outcome. Results indicate that assisted walking with conversation can contribute to maintenance of functional mobility in institutionalized populations with Alzheimer disease. Staff assigned to this task should be prepared to use effective communication strategies to gain acceptance of the intervention.
    Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 10/2000; 14(4):196-201. DOI:10.1097/00002093-200010000-00002 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: D Di ia ag gn no os si is
Show more