Patients who bring weapons to the psychiatric emergency room.

The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 5.14). 07/1987; 48(6):230-3.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The personal characteristics of patients who brought weapons to a university hospital-based psychiatric emergency room were examined. During 14 months following implementation of a routine weapon-screening procedure, 37 (4%) of 1012 psychiatric emergency room patients were found to have weapons. These patients did not differ significantly from a randomly selected control group of non-weapon-carrying patients on a variety of demographic and clinical variables often associated with violence potential, although the weapon-carrying patients were more likely to be male and have a history of substance abuse. The heterogeneity of personal characteristics of weapon-carrying patients is likely to make them difficult to distinguish clinically from other patients. The findings have important implications for maintaining safety in the psychiatric emergency room.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Violence in the emergency department, a not uncommon but complex phenomenon, may become more serious when patients possess weapons. Searches are used frequently to reduce this danger, though guidelines for searches are not well delineated. We examined our practices in order to formalize our guidelines. Retrospective chart review of patients found to be carrying weapons. General, university-based emergency department in the Northwest. Of 39,000 patients seen during the 20-month study period, 500 (1.3%) were searched. Of all patients seen in the ED, 92% were medical patients (153, 0.4% of whom were searched) and 8% were psychiatric patients (347, 11.1% of whom were searched). Weapons were found on 89 patients (0.2% of all ED patients and 17.8% of all patients searched). Review showed that 24 (15.7%) medical and 60 (17.3%) psychiatric patients carried weapons. Although various factors contributed to a clear bias toward searching psychiatric patients, we believe that the rate of weapons possession did not support this bias.
    Annals of Emergency Medicine 02/1991; 20(1):8-10. · 4.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychologists and other mental health professionals practicing in essentially all clinical settings are called on to assess and manage clients who may pose a risk of violence to third parties. Over the past 25 years much has been learned about the relationship between violence and mental disorder, and about assessing violence risk. In this article risk factors for violence among persons with mental disorder are reviewed, clinical assessment strategies are discussed, and a model for thinking about treatment and other types of interventions designed to minimize violence risk is offered.
    Journal of Clinical Psychology 11/2000; 56(10):1239-62. · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate emergency medical services (EMS) providers' experience with weapons encountered while working, and evaluate the training they have received regarding searching for and confiscating weapons in the field. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey anonymously completed by a convenience sample of EMS providers in the metropolitan Boston and Los Angeles (LA) areas. Of 2,672 surveys distributed, 2,224 (83%) were returned. Forty-two percent of the respondents (39% of Boston and 46% of LA) reported searching patients for weapons, and 62% (51% of Boston and 76% of LA) reported finding weapons. The LA respondents were more likely than the Boston respondents to have found a firearm. Twenty-seven percent of the respondents reported they had found more than five weapons in their careers. One thousand seven hundred seventy-two (80%) providers replied that they would report discovered weapons, most frequently to law enforcement personnel. Providers with higher EMS education and ones who received weapons-related training were more likely to search for, find, and report weapons. Four hundred fifty-one (20%) respondents reported receiving formal weapons-related training, 291 (13%) considered their initial EMS training on weapons-related topics to be adequate, and 292 (13%) considered their continuing education in these areas adequate. These data suggest that weapons encountered in the field are a widespread problem for EMS providers. Although many EMS providers search for and find weapons on their patients, most of them feel they have been inadequately trained in this area. Prospective studies are needed to document the actual incidence of weapon encounters in the prehospital setting. Multidisciplinary discussions are needed to address the above issues.
    Prehospital Emergency Care 01/2000; 4(3):209-16. · 1.81 Impact Factor