The significance of one abnormal glucose tolerance test value on adverse outcome in pregnancy.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.88). 10/1987; 157(3):758-63. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(88)90066-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A matched control study of 126 women equally divided into three groups (normal oral glucose tolerance test, one abnormal test value, and gestational diabetes mellitus) was undertaken to examine the relationships among oral glucose tolerance test results, glycemic control in pregnancy, and adverse perinatal outcome. Characterization of metabolic control for the one abnormal oral glucose tolerance test value and the gestational diabetes mellitus groups (before treatment) showed no significant difference. After the start of treatment, however, a significant (p less than 0.01) difference between the groups in level of control was found. While no significant difference in the average birth weight between the three groups was discovered, the incidence of large infants (macrosomia and large for gestational age) was found to be significantly higher in the one abnormal oral glucose tolerance test group when compared with the normal (34% versus 9%; p less than 0.01) and gestational diabetes mellitus group (34% versus 12%; p less than 0.01). No significant difference for the incidence of an infant large for gestational age was found between the normal group and the patients with gestational diabetes mellitus after treatment. Neonatal metabolic disorders were found to be significantly higher for the one abnormal oral glucose tolerance test group (15%) when compared with the control and the gestational diabetes mellitus groups (3%). We conclude that, if left untreated, one abnormal value on an oral glucose tolerance test is strongly associated with adverse perinatal outcome.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To determine whether an abnormal 50-g glucose-challenge test (GCT) is independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Methods: A retrospective study of women with abnormal GCT (>140 mg/dL) but normal subsequent 100-g oral glucose-tolerance test (OGTT). Pregnancy outcome was compared with that of women with normal GCT (<140 mg/dL). Results: Of the 79,153 women delivered during the study period, the results of the GCT were available for 14,268. Of these, 809 (5.7%) had an abnormal GCT and normal OGTT and were eligible for the study group. An abnormal GCT was independently associated with an increased risk for macrosomia (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.5-2.7), large for gestational age (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-2.0), cesarean section (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6), respiratory morbidity (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.7) and neonatal hypoglycemia (OR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-3.2). In contrast, an abnormal GCT was associated with decreased risk for preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9) and 34 weeks (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.6). The association between abnormal GCT and adverse pregnancy outcome was unrelated to the degree of GCT abnormality except for cases in which the GCT was extremely high (≥180 mg/dL). Conclusion: Women with abnormal-GCT result are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcome even in the presence of a normal subsequent OGTT.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 08/2012; · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The new criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus proposed by the International Diabetes in Pregnancy Consensus group (IADPSG) transports back the controversy and the lack of agreement to the frontlines. The recommended criteria are based on results of the observational hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study (HAPO). These criteria will increase the frequency of gestational diabetes diagnosis by 2-8 fold, depending upon ethnicity, and prevalence of obesity. Do the costs and implied resources justify using the proposed endpoints that will define pregnancy outcome and severity especially when the appropriate outcomes and odds ratio used to define the diagnosis are questionable? Furthermore, due to the large disparity around the globe in relation to the prevalence of GDM raises the question if single diagnostic criteria can be made to fit all?!? The current review analyzes the risks, costs and benefits that may influence the rate of GDM in relation to the worldwide prevalence.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 10/2012; · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was aimed to assess the diversity of the meconium microbiome and determine if the bacterial community is affected by maternal diabetes status. The first intestinal discharge (meconium) was collected from 23 newborns stratified by maternal diabetes status: 4 mothers had pre-gestational type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) including one mother with dizygotic twins, 5 developed gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and 13 had no diabetes. The meconium microbiome was profiled using multi-barcode 16S rRNA sequencing followed by taxonomic assignment and diversity analysis. All meconium samples were not sterile and contained diversified microbiota. Compared with adult feces, the meconium showed a lower species diversity, higher sample-to-sample variation, and enrichment of Proteobacteria and reduction of Bacteroidetes. Among the meconium samples, the taxonomy analyses suggested that the overall bacterial content significantly differed by maternal diabetes status, with the microbiome of the DM group showing higher alpha-diversity than that of no-diabetes or GDM groups. No global difference was found between babies delivered vaginally versus via Cesarean-section. Regression analysis showed that the most robust predictor for the meconium microbiota composition was the maternal diabetes status that preceded pregnancy. Specifically, Bacteroidetes (phyla) and Parabacteriodes (genus) were enriched in the meconium in the DM group compared to the no-diabetes group. Our study provides evidence that meconium contains diversified microbiota and is not affected by the mode of delivery. It also suggests that the meconium microbiome of infants born to mothers with DM is enriched for the same bacterial taxa as those reported in the fecal microbiome of adult DM patients.
    PLoS ONE 01/2013; 8(11):e78257. · 3.53 Impact Factor