Impact-absorbing properties of the human knee.

Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England.
The Bone & Joint Journal (Impact Factor: 2.8). 12/1987; 69(5):807-11.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A biomechanical study has been carried out on 20 cadaveric knees to investigate their load-absorbing mechanism. The impact load was applied using a weight falling onto the transected proximal femur and the force transmitted through the knee was measured at the transected distal tibia using a load transducer. The peak force transmitted increased as, sequentially, meniscus, articular cartilage and subchondral bone were damaged or removed. The most striking result was found in an implanted knee replacement where the transmitted force reached 180% of that in the intact knee. The results show that the joint has an impact-absorbing property in each segment and that in the osteoarthritic knee there is less absorption of shock than in the normal knee. The high impact force in an implanted knee suggests that microfractures of the cancellous bone might be expected and may produce loosening.

  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated the effect of damage of the posterior and anterior horns of the medial meniscus on knee stability. Twenty fresh-frozen porcine knees were divided into two groups (anterior horn and posterior horn injury). Each group was tested in three states: intact medial meniscus, posterior or anterior horn of medial meniscus resection and total medial meniscectomy. A robotic testing system was used to test anterior tibial translation (ATT) at 30A degrees (full extension), 60A degrees and 90A degrees of knee flexion with an external anterior tibial load of 89 N, internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) at 30A degrees and 60A degrees of knee flexion under a 4 N m tibial rotation torque. In response to an IR torque, there was a significant difference between the state of intact medial meniscus and anterior and posterior horn damage, except for anterior horn resection at 60A degrees of knee flexion. In response to an ER torque, there were no significant differences between the state of intact meniscus and horn damage except for anterior horn resection at 30A degrees of knee flexion. Meniscal damage had no significant effect on ATT. The results indicated that the posterior horn was more important in controlling the IR stability than the anterior horn with knee flexion, and the anterior horn was more important in controlling the ER stability than the posterior horn at full knee extension in the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knee. These findings further the understanding of the mechanisms, the prevention of injuries and rehabilitation of meniscal horn injury in clinical practice.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 08/2014; 23(1). DOI:10.1007/s00167-014-3241-9 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs both evolved lineages of huge terrestrial herbivores. Although significantly more saurischian dinosaurs were giants than eutherians, the long bones of both taxa scale similarly and suggest that locomotion was dynamically similar. However, articular cartilage is thin in eutherian mammals but thick in saurischian dinosaurs, differences that could have contributed to, or limited, how frequently gigantism evolved. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that sub-articular bone, which supports the articular cartilage, changes shape in different ways between terrestrial mammals and dinosaurs with increasing size. Our sample consisted of giant mammal and reptile taxa (i.e., elephants, rhinos, sauropods) plus erect and non-erect outgroups with thin and thick articular cartilage. Our results show that eutherian mammal sub-articular shape becomes narrow with well-defined surface features as size increases. In contrast, this region in saurischian dinosaurs expands and remains gently convex with increasing size. Similar trends were observed in non-erect outgroup taxa (monotremes, alligators), showing that the trends we report are posture-independent. These differences support our hypothesis that sub-articular shape scales differently between eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs. Our results show that articular cartilage thickness and sub-articular shape are correlated. In mammals, joints become ever more congruent and thinner with increasing size, whereas archosaur joints remained both congruent and thick, especially in sauropods. We suggest that gigantism occurs less frequently in mammals, in part, because joints composed of thin articular cartilage can only become so congruent before stress cannot be effectively alleviated. In contrast, frequent gigantism in saurischian dinosaurs may be explained, in part, by joints with thick articular cartilage that can deform across large areas with increasing load.
    PLoS ONE 10/2013; 8(10):e75216. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0075216 · 3.53 Impact Factor


1 Download
Available from