Relative value of clinical variables, bicycle ergometry, rest radionuclide ventriculography and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring at discharge to predict 1 year survival after myocardial infarction.

Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 08/1986; 8(1):40-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80089-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The relative value of predischarge clinical variables, bicycle ergometry, radionuclide ventriculography and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring for predicting survival during the first year in 351 hospital survivors of acute myocardial infarction was assessed. Discriminant function analysis showed that in patients eligible for stress testing the extent of blood pressure increase during exercise slightly improved the predictive accuracy beyond that of simple clinical variables (history of previous myocardial infarction, persistent heart failure after the acute phase of infarction and use of digitalis at discharge), whereas radionuclide ventriculography and 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring did not. The predictive value for mortality was 12% with clinical variables alone and 15% with the stress test added. Radionuclide ventriculography and 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring were slightly additive to clinical information in the whole group of patients independent of the eligibility for stress testing (predictive value for mortality 24% with clinical variables alone and 26% with radionuclide ejection fraction and 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring added). It is concluded that the appropriate use of simple clinical variables and stress testing is sufficient for risk stratification in postinfarction patients, whereas radionuclide ventriculography and 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring should be limited to patients not eligible for stress testing.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Kurzfassung: Hintergrund und Fragestellung: Die Risikoeinschätzung ambulanter Patienten mit thoraka- ler Schmerzsymptomatik ist ein wichtiges klinisches Problem. Über die prognostische Bedeutung der physi- kalischen Streßechokardiographie (SE) bei diesem Pa- tientenkollektiv wurde bis jetzt nicht berichtet. Patienten und Methoden: Um die prognostische Be- deutung der physikalischen Streßechokardiographie bei rein ambulanten Patienten zu untersuchen, wurden 3329 Patienten bezüglich des Auftretens schwerer Er- eignisse (kardialer Tod, Myokardinfarkt, Revaskulari- sation) im Langzeitverlauf nachbeobachtet. Die Patien- ten wurden wegen thorakaler Schmerzsymptomatik in der kardiologischen Praxis vorstellig. Ergebnisse: Die Sensitivität/Spezifität der SE be- züglich schwerer Ereignisse betrug im ersten Jahr 81,1/92,8, die des Belastungs-EKGs 27,4/87,0. In der Beobachtungszeit (5,1 ± 1,1 Jahre (Median 5,2; 3-7 J.)) traten insgesamt 446 schwere Ereignisse auf (13,4 %). Bei Patienten mit positivem SE-Befund traten 262 (61,9 %) schwere Ereignisse auf, bei Patienten mit ne- gativem SE-Befund waren schwere Ereignisse seltener (184; 6,3 %; p < 0,001). Bei der multivariaten Analyse war der positive SE-Befund der deutlichste signifikan- te und unabhängige Prädiktor für schwere Ereignisse (HR 6,6; Konfidenzintervall 5,21-8,25; p < 0,001). Folgerungen: Die physikalische Streßechokardio- graphie hat einen wichtigen unabhängigen prognosti- schen Wert bei ambulanten Patienten mit thorakaler Beschwerdesymptomatik. Sie ist dem Belastungs-EKG hinsichtlich der prognostischen Aussage deutlich über- legen und sollte bei unklaren Fällen immer durchge- führt werden. Abstract: Prognostic Significance of Exercise Stress Echocardiography in 3329 Outpatients (5-Year Longitudinal Study). Background: Appraisal of the risk to which outpatients with chest pain are ex- posed is a major clinical problem. Up to now, there have been no reports on the prognostic significance of exercise stress echocardiography in these patients. Patients and Methods: In order to investigate the prognostic significance of exercise stress echocardio- graphy (SE) in outpatients, 3329 patients were ob-
    Journal für Kardiologie - Austrian Journal of Cardiology 2005; 12 (11-12): 292-302. 06/2005; 2005;12(2012):292-302.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For many years it has been recognized that some persons who survive acute myocardial infarction (MI) remain at considerable risk of mortality, in some cases for years.1 It has also been recognized that approximately 50% of deaths in survivors of MI occur suddenly and unexpectedly. Since the advent of telemetric electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring for patients with acute MI in the 1960s, ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation have been understood to precipitate most cardiac arrests after MI. These events usually occur without any apparent precipitating factor. While we have effective treatment for survivors of cardiac arrest, a minority (2–30%) of arrest victims survive the acute event.2–7 Thus, there is considerable rationale to attempt primary prevention of cardiac arrest if we are to improve the overall survival of patients with coronary disease.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent years, the characteristics of patients who suffer acute myocardial infarction without complications during hospitalization have changed. In addition, the range of non-invasive studies available for evaluating left ventricular systolic function, residual myocardial ischemia, and myocardial viability in these patients has improved. Left ventricular systolic function and residual ischemia should be evaluated in all patients before release. The non-invasive technique used (exercise test, echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, magnetic resonance imaging) depends on availability, experience, and results at each institution. Coronary arteriography should be performed in patients with significant ischemia or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction in non-invasive studies. In these cases coronary angiography must be performed to determine if coronary arteries are suitable for revascularization before performing a test of myocardial viability.
    Revista Espa de Cardiologia 01/2003; 56(3):303-313. · 3.34 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014