Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 02/1987; 52(1):27-40. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.27
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The antecedents of marital stability (divorce or remaining married) and marital satisfaction (within the group that remains married) were investigated with a panel of 300 couples who were followed from their engagements in the 1930s until 1980. Twenty-two of the couples broke their engagements; of the 278 couples who married, 50 got divorced at some time between 1935 and 1980. Personality characteristics (measured by acquaintance ratings made in the 1930s) were important predictors of both marital stability and marital satisfaction. The three aspects of personality most strongly related to marital outcome were the neuroticism of the husband, the neuroticism of the wife, and the impulse control of the husband. In combination, the 17 major antecedent variables were moderately predictive of a criterion variable composed of both marital stability and marital satisfaction (R = .49). The three major aspects of personality accounted for more than half of the predictable variance. The remaining variance was accounted for by attitudinal, social-environment, and sexual history variables.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the study, the dyadic adjustments in marital relationships of young adults between ages 20-45, their temperament properties that are supposed to be brought natively and the relationships between the attitudes they perceived from their parents which are known as to be gained afterwards, separation-individuation and the adaptation of resilience have been analysed. The Personal Information Form, The Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Five Factor Personality Inventory (Short Form), The Resilience Scale, The Scale of Separation-Individuation and Perceived Parental Attitudes – Mother and Father Forms have been carried out on the sampling group of 135 couples living in Istanbul. As a result of the research, there is positively significant relation between extraversion, openness to experience and marital adjustment in both men and women. Neuroticism and marital adjustment is related negatively for both genders. The agreeableness is related positively with marital adjustment only for men. As the resilience of both women and men increases, the marital adjustment also increases. The marital adjustment level decreases when both women and men fail to practice separation-individuation successfully. The marital adjustment levels of the men gets higher when they perceive that there autonomy is supported by their mothers. The marital adjustment levels of the men decreases when they perceive that they are kept under control psychologically by their mothers. Similarly, the marital adjustment levels of the men decreases when they perceive that they are kept under control psychologically by their fathers. The marital adjustment levels of the men increases more when they perceive that their autonomy is supported by their fathers and their fathers are more sensitive, tender and concerned. It is found out that there is no relation between the parental attitudes the women from the sampling group perceived from their mothers and the marital adjustment. Also the marital adjustment levels of the women increases more when they perceive that their fathers are more sensitive, tender and concerned and their autonomy is supported by their fathers. The marital adjustment levels of the women decreases who perceive that their fathers have a manipulative and compulsive control.
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 08/2014; 140. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.385
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Marital quality in connection to its demographical and psychological correlates has been studied extensively in the West. In India also, it has been given considerable attention, but adequate exploration of relevant psychological variables is still wanting. The present study was conceptualized in this context to explore differences in the Personality factors, Attachment styles and Coping strategies in couples with good and poor marital quality. Data were collected from 90 couples for initial screening. Finally 20 couples with good marital quality and 20 couples with poor marital quality were selected based on scores of Marital Quality Scale. The tools used for screening were Marital Quality Scale and General Health Questionnaire-28. Other tools consisted of Neo Five Factor Inventory, Attachment style Questionnaire, and Coping Check list. Analysis revealed that the husbands with poor marital quality had higher neuroticism, less extraversion, less secure attachment style, less problem focused coping and acceptance, and greater denial than those with good marital quality. Wives with poor marital quality differed significantly from the wives with good marital quality in terms of less religious coping, acceptance and social support. The findings of the study may be utilized for advising maritally distressed couples by enhancing their coping resources and utilizing attachment potentials for furtherance of quality of married life.
    Psychological Studies 03/2014; 59(1):59-67. DOI:10.1007/s12646-013-0233-7
  • Source
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: Literature in franchise has virtually ignored the role of psychological aspects on firm interorganizational results, despite its influence on firm level results and relationship quality. Therefore, the present study aims to examine the influence of franchisees’ personality and entrepreneurial drive on franchisor-franchisee relationship quality and financial performance over time. The study also investigated the role of the time of relationship on the relationship quality and financial performance. This study used a self-report survey conducted by mail to collect data from a sample of 342 franchisees selected from 3 franchise networks. Personality was represented by the Big-Five personality traits (IPIP-B5 scales): extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and imagination. Entrepreneur drive was represented by the Carland Entrepreneurship Index (CEI). Relationship quality was conceptualized through a 23-item second-order construct (incorporating trust, commitment, and relationship satisfaction), while financial performance was represented by using a scale measuring sales growth and profitability. Time of relationship was measured by the months of relationship between franchisee and franchisor. A Partial Least Squares (PLS) structural equation model, mean analysis, and regression analysis were conducted to test the hypothesized relationships. Three of the five personality dimensions produced the predicted effect on the outcome variables of relationship quality – agreeableness (positively), emotional stability (positively), and imagination (positively). Financial performance was affected as predicted by conscientiousness (positively), emotional stability (positively), and imagination (positively). As expected, relationship quality presented a positive and significant effect on financial performance. Entrepreneurial drive showed the predicted positive effect only on performance. Time of relationship presented the positive predicted effect on the franchisor-franchisee relationship as regards relationship quality and financial performance; however, the hypothesized shape of the relationship phases could only partially be confirmed, since only between two phases (routine and stabilization) mean analysis showed significant differences. Results indicate that personality does in fact influence relationship quality and performance, but the manner in which this occurs differs from the Brazilian context where this research was conducted to the findings of research conducted in Australia, suggesting that factors such as culture and market stability may have influence on the relationship between personality traits and both relationship quality and financial performance. Entrepreneurial drive appears to positively influence franchisee performance, but its influence proved not to produce a significant impact on relationship quality. The present study’s results also indicate the importance of the time of relationship needed to foster relationship quality and performance. Moreover, longterm relationships are related to better franchisee relationship quality and financial performance assessments. Limitations of this work and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.


Available from