The debate over diagnosis related groups.

Journal of Community Health (Impact Factor: 1.28). 02/1985; 10(2):81-92. DOI: 10.1007/BF01326513
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT With the advent of the Prospective Payment System (PPS) using Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) as a classification method, the pros and cons of that mechanism have been sharply debated. Grouping the comments into categories related to administration/management, DRG system and quality of care, a review of relevant literature highlights the pertinent attitudes and views of professionals and organizations. Points constantly argued include data utilization, meaningful medical classifications, resource use, gaming, profit centers, patient homogeneity, severity of illness, length of stay, technology limitations and the erosion of standards.

  • Source
    Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 04/2004; 4(2):127-30. · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The major trends in the growth of prospective payment and the corporatization of medical practice in the United States are examined. In particular, the ethical implications of these changes in the context of the multiple system goals of access, cost containment, and quality are considered. Considerable concern is being expressed that with the dominant emphasis on cost containment, the principles of access and quality might be compromised. This paper formulates a research agenda to address this question, based on a review and synthesis of empirical evidence and hypotheses about the probable or actual impact of these changes on the multiple health system goals. A basic premise is that ethical judgments should be grounded in empirical evidence about what actually is or will be.
    Social Justice Research 01/1987; 1(3):275-296. · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In an effort to control rampant hospital-cost inflation, Congress passed the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 and the Social Security Amendments of 1983. The result of these two initiatives is the implementation of a prospective payment system (PPS) that uses diagnosis related groups (DRGs) in classifying patients and reimbursing hospitals for Medicare patients. Using the Health Care Financing Adminstration's (HCFA) meth on the average the typical naval hospital would have been reimbursed 32 percent more than actual inpatient expenses had it been reimbursed under Medicare.