Article

Teaching clinical medicine in the ambulatory setting. An idea whose time may have finally come.

New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 51.66). 02/1986; 314(1):27-31. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198601023140105
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A resurgence of general interest in teaching clinical medicine in ambulatory-care settings has occurred for several reasons, including changes in the case mix in teaching hospitals, the new responsibilities of house officers and attending physicians brought about by the current payment systems for health care, the increased expectations of patients that medical care will be "personal," the progressive limitations imposed on the education of medical students by the shorter lengths of stay sought by hospitals under the diagnosis-related-groups system of payment, and the growing need for well-trained primary care physicians that has resulted from the increase in medical care organizations. In this paper, I review earlier attempts to emphasize ambulatory care, to identify the pitfalls that new efforts in this direction should avoid. I also compare inpatient and ambulatory-care teaching to provide a basis for understanding the educational goals that can be achieved more easily in each setting. In addition, I suggest major changes in the flow and use of clinical-practice funds and hospital payments so that they can become possible sources of the financing and organization of an expanded effort to teach clinical medicine in ambulatory-care settings.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
124 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors describe a family medicine center before and after a merger between the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, the California Hospital Medical Center, and the Eisner Pediatric and Family Medical Center in 2012. The merger provided new opportunities to stabilize the financial base of a clinical practice struggling financially and to enhance the training of residents and other health professionals in primary care, which motivated the partners to consider this new model. After 18 months of negotiations, they were able to convert the family medicine center and residency program into a new federally qualified health center. The benefits to this new model include an increase in both patient volume and the quality of education, supporting residency accreditation; a greater number of residents from U.S. medical schools; enhanced education and preparation of primary care physicians for practice in medically underserved communities; enhanced reimbursements and new opportunities for state, local, and federal grants; and quality improvement and new information technology. The partners overcame academic, administrative, legal, and regulatory obstacles, communication barriers, and differences in culture and expectations to achieve this merger. Keys to their success include the commitment of the leaders at the three institutions to the goals of the merger, a dedicated project manager and consultants, opportunities for new revenue sources and reimbursements, and support from a pioneering charitable foundation. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of using community health centers as the focal point for training primary care clinicians and addressing workforce shortages.
    Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 03/2013; · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Patients' attitude towards medical students' presence during treatment depends on the cultural values of the society. This study was conducted to find out the patients' receptiveness in our society to be involved in teaching process for medical students during consultation in out patient department of a teaching hospital in Karachi Pakistan. Methodology: This cross sectional study was conducted in the surgical Out Patient Department (OPD) at Dow University Hospital from May 2012 to June 2012. Four hundred and eleven patients consented for participation through non probability purposive sampling, in which 279 patients were from morning clinics in the presence of students for clinical teaching, while 132 patients participated through evening clinics of surgery, when students were not present for comparison in specific dimensions of care for patients' satisfaction. Results: Majority of patients 293 (71%) agreed with the teaching of students during consultation and they feel they are contributing in future doctor's teaching, only 24% patients disagreed. Fifty two percent of patients who disagreed reported interference in privacy, 34% reported interference in consultation and 43% felt it resulted in prolong waiting time due to teaching. Conclusion: Majority of the patients agree to be part of teaching for medical students and this study can be used to assess the educational interventions designed to improve the patient based teaching.
    Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Online 04/2013; 29(2):454-7. · 0.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Community-based outpatient experiences are a core component of the clinical years in medical school. Central to the success of this experience is the recruitment and retention of volunteer faculty from the community. Prior studies have identified reasons why some preceptors volunteer their time however, there is a paucity of data comparing those who volunteer from those who do not. Methods: A survey was developed following a review of previous studies addressing perceptions of community-based preceptors. A non-parametric, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare active preceptors (APs) and inactive preceptors (IPs) and all data were analyzed in SPSS 20.0. Results: There was a 28% response rate. Preceptors showed similar demographic characteristics, valued intrinsic over extrinsic benefits, and appreciated Continuing Medical Education (CME)/Maintenance of Certification (MOC) opportunities as the highest extrinsic reward. APs were more likely to also precept at the M1/M2 level and value recognition and faculty development opportunities (p<0.05). IPs denoted time as the most significant barrier and, in comparison to APs, rated financial compensation as more important (p<0.05). Conclusions: Community preceptors are motivated by intrinsic benefits of teaching. Efforts to recruit should initially focus on promoting awareness of teaching opportunities and offering CME/MOC opportunities. Increasing the pool of preceptors may require financial compensation.
    Medical Education Online 01/2013; 18:1-7.