Article

The relationship of psychosocial factors to prognostic indicators in cutaneous malignant melanoma.

University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
Journal of Psychosomatic Research (Impact Factor: 2.84). 02/1985; 29(2):139-53. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90035-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study investigated the relationship between prognosis (estimated by histopathologic indicators) in cutaneous malignant melanoma and a comprehensive set of physical risk, demographic, psychosocial, and situational variables. These variables were derived from the medical examination, the pathology report, psychosocial self-report measures, and an hour-long videotaped interview with 59 patients from two melanoma clinics in San Francisco. Variables significantly correlated with tumor thickness were: darker skin/hair/eye coloring, longer patient delay in seeking medical attention, two correlated dimensions within an operationally defined 'Type C' constellation of characteristics, two character style measures, and less previous knowledge of melanoma and understanding of its treatment. Of these variables, delay was the most significant in a hierarchical multiple regression analysis in which tumor thickness was the dependent variable. Associations between tumor thickness and psychosocial measures of Type C were considerably stronger and more significant for subjects less than age 55, suggesting that the role of behavioral and psychosocial factors in the course of malignant melanoma is more potent for younger than for older subjects.

0 Followers
 · 
76 Views
  • Source
    Advances in Malignant Melanoma - Clinical and Research Perspectives, 09/2011; , ISBN: 978-953-307-575-4
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We tested the hypothesis that personality plays a role in cancer outcome in a population-based prospective cohort study in Japan. In July 1990, 41 442 residents of Japan completed a short form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised and a questionnaire on various health habits, and between January 1993 and December 1997, 890 incident cases of cancer were identified among them. These 890 cases were followed up until March 2001, and a total of 356 deaths from all causes was identified among them. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of death according to four score levels on each of four personality subscales (extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism, and lie), with adjustment for potential confounding factors. Multivariable HRs of deaths from all causes for individuals in the highest score level on each personality subscale compared with those at the lowest level were 1.0 for extraversion (95% CI=0.8–1.4; Trend P=0.73), 1.1 for neuroticism (0.8–1.6; Trend P=0.24), 1.2 for psychoticism (0.9–1.6; Trend P=0.29), and 1.0 for lie (0.7–1.5; Trend P=0.90). The data obtained in this population-based prospective cohort study in Japan do not support the hypothesis that personality is associated with cancer survival.Keywords: death from all causes, Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised, Japanese, prospective cohort study, survival
    British Journal of Cancer 05/2005; 92(11):2089-2094. DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602610 · 4.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Larger keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) lesions are associated with higher morbidity. This study examined the association of potentially modifiable characteristics, including treatment delay, with KC defect size after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). A stratified random sample of patients treated for KC with MMS were selected for telephone interview. Two hundred and nineteen interviews were completed (refusal rate 24%). Regression models were used to examine the predictors to defect size and delay. Anatomic site, age, histology, and gender predicted defect size (R(2) = 0.39) and were used as control variables. Self-reported delay between initial physician examination and MMS predicted defect size (p = 0.0004), with greater than 1 y delay being associated with a doubling of defect size (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-3.1). Delays of this duration were associated with initial examination by a primary provider (unadjusted OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.7-8.8), misdiagnosis (unadjusted OR 6.8; 95% CI 2.5-18.7), being treated without biopsy (unadjusted OR 23.3; 95% CI 6.5-83.7), and multiple surgical removals (unadjusted OR 6.2; 95% CI 2.5-15.5). All but provider specialty were independent predictors of delay. Attention to processes of care delivery for KC may have a greater impact on morbidity than efforts are earlier detection by the public.
    Journal of Investigative Dermatology 03/2005; 124(2):308-14. DOI:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23546.x · 6.37 Impact Factor