Article

Long-term prognosis after myocardial infarction in men with diabetes.

Diabetes (Impact Factor: 8.47). 09/1985; 34(8):787-92. DOI: 10.2337/diab.34.8.787
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Men (1306) who survived a first myocardial infarction (MI) were studied. The mean follow-up time was 6.5 yr, and at the end of the follow-up period survival status was known for all patients. By the time of the MI the prevalence of diabetes was 5.6%. Patients with and without diabetes were compared. There were no differences in the estimated primary or secondary risk. The cumulative survival rate 1, 2, and 5 yr after the MI was 82, 78, and 58% among the diabetic subjects compared with 94, 92, and 82% among the nondiabetic subjects (P less than 0.001). The difference remained even after allowance for age and estimated secondary risk in a multivariate regression analysis. There were no differences in mortality rates among patients with type I diabetes compared with type II diabetes, nor among patients treated with diet alone, sulfonylurea, or insulin, but the numbers were small. The cumulative rate of reinfarctions after 1, 2, and 5 yr was 18, 28, and 46% in diabetic subjects and 12, 17, and 27% in nondiabetic subjects (P = 0.004). A history of diabetes was an independent secondary risk factor among male survivors of a first MI with respect to deaths and reinfarctions.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
99 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In patients with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease is the principal cause of mortality and chest pain is the most frequent symptom in patients with stable and acute coronary artery disease. However, there is little knowledge concerning the pervasiveness of uncommon presentations in diabetics. The symptomatology of acute coronary syndrome, which comprises both pain and non-pain symptoms, may be affected by traditional risk factors such as age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Such atypical symptoms may range from silent myocardial ischemia to a wide spectrum of non-chest pain symptoms. Worldwide, few studies have highlighted this under-investigated subject, and this aspect of ischemic heart disease has also been under-evaluated in the major clinical trials. The results of these studies are highly diverse which makes definitive conclusions regarding the spectrum of atypical presentation of acute and even stable chronic coronay artery disease difficult to confirm. This may have a significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of coronary artery disease in diabetics. In this up-to-date review we will try to analyze the most recent studies on the atypical presentations in both acute and chronic ischemic heart disease which may give some emphasis to this under-investigated topic.
    World Journal of Cardiology (WJC) 08/2014; 6(8):802-13. DOI:10.4330/wjc.v6.i8.802 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE— To determine, after 1 yr of follow-up in type II diabetes patients, whether a statistically and clinically significant difference can be achieved in HbA lc between a standard therapy group and an intensively treated group, while maintain-ing HbA lc levels in both groups within ranges acceptable in regular community practice. Secondary objectives include assessment of patient adherence to protocol, side effects, and accuracy of data collection. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — This is a prospective, randomized, controlled VA CS conducted with 151 patients at five VAMCs. Patients are males, age 40-69 yr, treated at entry with a maximum dose of sulfonylurea or with insulin, exhibiting an HbA lc level > 3 SDs above the normal mean (5.05 + 3 X 0.50 = >6.55%). Standard control is achieved with insulin and intensive control with a step-up regimen including insulin alone or insulin/glipizide combinations. Education and management of cardiovascular risk factors are handled similarly in both groups. Primary macrovascular end points are nonfatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, amputation, and cardiovascular death. Primary microvascular FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COOPERATIVE STUDIES PROGRAM.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reduction of long term mortality by marital status is well established in general populations. However, effects have been shown to change over time and differ considerably by cause of death. This study examined the effects of marital status on long term mortality after the first acute myocardial infarction. Data were retrieved from the population-based MONICA(Monitoring trends and determinants on cardiovascular diseases) /KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg)-myocardial infarction registry which assesses cases from the city of Augsburg and 2 adjacent districts located in southern Bavaria, Germany. A total of 3,766 men and women aged 28 to 74 years who were alive 28 days after their first myocardial infarction were included. Hazard ratios (HR) for the effects of marital status on mortality after one to 10 years of follow-up are presented. The study population included 2,854 (75.8%) married individuals. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, with an inter-quartile range of 3.3 to 7.6 years, 533 (14.15%) deaths occurred. Among married and unmarried individuals 388 (13.6%) and 145 (15.9%) deaths occurred, respectively. Overall marital status showed an insignificant protective HR of 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.22). Stratified analyses revealed strong protective effects only among men and women younger than 60 who were diagnosed with hyperlipidemia. HRs ranged from 0.27 (95%CI 0.13-0.59) for a two-year survival to 0.43 (95%CI 0.27-0.68) for a 10-year survival. Substitution of marital status with co-habitation status confirmed the strata-specific effect [HR: 0.52 (95% CI 0.31-0.86)]. Marital status has a strong protective effect among first myocardial infarction survivors with diagnosed hyperlipidemia, which diminishes with increasing age. Treatments, recommended lifestyle changes or other attributes specific to hyperlipidema may be underlying factors, mediated by the social support of spouses. Underlying causes should be examined in further studies.
    BMC Public Health 01/2014; 14(1):98. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-98 · 2.32 Impact Factor
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format