Article

Hemodynamic effects of calcium channel blockers at rest and during exercise in essential hypertension.

The American Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.3). 11/1985; 79(4A):11-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90495-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The main hemodynamic disturbance occurring in patients with essential hypertension is an increase in the total peripheral resistance. In young patients with hypertension, this disturbance is clearly seen during muscular exercise, even though the calculated resistance might be normal during rest. This article reports results of studies on the long-term hemodynamic effects of two calcium channel blockers, verapamil and nifedipine, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Twenty-five men, aged 20 to 64 years, with diastolic blood pressures between 100 and 120 mm Hg before treatment were studied at rest and during exercise on ergometer bicycles. Blood pressure was recorded intra-arterially, and cardiac output was measured. After this initial study, 10 patients were treated with verapamil (from 40 to 80 mg, three times daily) and 15 patients with nifedipine (long-acting form, from 40 to 80 mg daily). After one year, the hemodynamic study was repeated. Both drugs induced a reduction in blood pressure and in the total peripheral resistance without any reduction in the cardiac index. Verapamil reduced heart rate, particularly during exercise, but this effect was compensated by an increase in the stroke volume. The hemodynamic profile of these two calcium channel blockers clearly differs from the hemodynamic effects of beta blockers.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
18 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of felodipine, a new calcium antagonist, as monotherapy in mild and moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 100mm Hg: phase V) was investigated in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study of 109 patients from 13 centres using 3 different doses. After a 2-week placebo run-in phase the patients were randomised in a double-blind fashion to receive felodipine 2.5mg bid (32 patients), 5mg bid (30 patients), 10mg bid (24 patients) or placebo (25 patients). Clinical and laboratory measurements were performed after 1, 3 and 8 weeks. 94 patients completed the study. Felodipine reduced supine systolic blood pressure by 22mm Hg from baseline after 8 weeks’ treatment on 2.5mg bid, 24mm Hg on 5mg bid and 24mm Hg on 10mg bid at 2 hours after dosage. The corresponding reduction in the placebo group was 6mm Hg. There was a reduction in supine diastolic blood pressure from baseline of 13mm Hg on felodipine 2.5mg bid, 14mm Hg on felodipine 5mg bid and 20mm Hg on felodipine 10mg bid, with no reduction in patients receiving placebo. The percentage of patients completing the study who achieved a supine diastolic blood pressure of 90mm Hg or less after 8 weeks’ treatment at 2 hours after dosage was 9% on placebo, 67% on felodipine 2.5mg bid, 57% on felodipine 5mg bid and 92% on felodipine 10mg bid; and at 12 hours after dosage those achieving target supine diastolic blood pressure was 17% on placebo, 37% on felodipine 2 5mg bid, 25% on felodipine 5mg bid and 62% on felodipine 10mg bid. Felodipine was generally well tolerated, although 10 patients on felodipine 10mg bid (42%), 1 on felodipine 5mg bid (3%) and 2 on felodipine 2.5mg bid (6%) withdrew from the study because of adverse effects. One serious adverse event, a myocardial infarction, occurred during the study in a patient with a history of postprandial non-exertional chest pain. In conclusion, felodipine monotherapy appreciably reduces blood pressure in mild and moderate hypertension without significant tachycardia in the short term. Doses of felodipine 2.5mg bid and 5mg bid are better tolerated than 10mg bid and can be recommended for initial treatment in this category of patients.
    Drugs 12/1987; 34(3). DOI:10.2165/00003495-198700343-00030 · 4.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To clarify the hemodynamic effects of verapamil, we investigated in normal volunteers the effects of 4-day treatment with verapamil (240 mg/day) on left ventricular function and on systemic and brachial artery haemodynamics, in comparison with the effects of placebo and atenolol (100 mg/day). Left ventricular structure and function was evaluated by echocardiography, systemic hemodynamics were assessed by pulsed Doppler velocimetry of the ascending aorta, and brachial artery hemodynamics were assessed pulsed Doppler velocimetry of the brachial artery. Verapamil decreased systemic and brachial artery vascular resistance (p less than 0.05), increased cardiac output (CO, p less than 0.01) and brachial flow (p = 0.054), and did not affect blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). In contrast, atenolol decreased BP, HR, and CO (p less than 0.001) but did not significantly affect brachial flow and systemic and brachial artery vascular resistance. We conclude that short-term administration of verapamil in normal humans produces systemic and brachial artery vasodilatation, with a reflex increase of stroke volume but not of HR.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 11/1989; 14(4):642-7. DOI:10.1097/00005344-198910000-00017 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Calcium antagonists are popular therapeutic agents in the treatment of systemic hypertension. Although these agents have similar antihypertensive efficacy, they have varied effects on left ventricular function at rest in hypertensive patients. The effect of different calcium antagonists on left ventricular function during exercise and on exercise performance in patients with hypertension, however, is less clear. Fifteen patients with essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure = 95 to 110 mm Hg) were enrolled in a placebo-controlled, single-blinded crossover study comparing nifedipine with verapamil for rest/exercise heart rate and blood pressure, exercise performance, and rest/exercise left ventricular function. Each drug was titrated to achieve resting diastolic pressures less than 90 mm Hg. All patients underwent maximal exercise testing and rest/exercise gated radionuclide ventriculography at the end of 3-week placebo, nifedipine, and verapamil treatment periods. Both calcium antagonists significantly reduced blood pressure at rest and during exercise compared with placebo. Neither calcium antagonist altered resting heart rate; however, both verapamil and nifedipine significantly reduced heart rate at maximal exercise. Verapamil but not nifedipine impaired left ventricular peak emptying rate and left ventricular peak filling rate during exercise but not at rest. Neither verapamil nor nifedipine, however, significantly altered rest or exercise global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with placebo. There was a trend, however, for impairment in the LVEF response to exercise (delta LVEF) in the verapamil treatment group. Exercise capacity was not significantly altered by either calcium antagonist compared with placebo. Thus verapamil but not nifedipine impairs left ventricular function during exercise in hypertensive patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    American Heart Journal 04/1990; 119(3 Pt 1):636-41. DOI:10.1016/S0002-8703(05)80287-X · 4.56 Impact Factor