Overinclusive Thinking in Mania and Schizophrenia

The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.99). 12/1974; 125(11):452-6. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.125.5.452
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Thirty one patients, 16 manics and 15 schizophrenics, and 15 normal controls were evaluated with the Payne battery of tests for overinclusive thinking. The manics showed significantly more overinclusive thinking than the schizophrenics on two out of three tests in the battery and on total transformed score. Schizophrenics were underinclusive when compared with normal controls, and manics were overinclusive. These data suggest that overinclusiveness is not specific to schizophrenia and that it is associated with illnesses which remit or have a good prognosis.

77 Reads
  • Source
    • "Hyperopia may first operate by altering the extent to which a given item is perceived to be luxurious. Clinical studies of compulsive behaviors demonstrate that an afflicted individual will consider a non-normatively large number of items as part of their target avoidance category (Andreasen and Powers 1974). Similarly, recent research suggests that consumers' personality characteristics may influence their perception of products as luxuries or necessities (Poynor and Haws 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article explores the phenomenon of "hyperopia," or an aversion to indulgence, as introduced by Kivetz and Keinan ( 2006 ) and Kivetz and Simonson ( 2002 ). We first develop a measure to capture hyperopia as an individual difference. Three empirical studies use this measure to demonstrate that hyperopia and high self-control are both conceptually and empirically distinct. Further, we show that altering the level at which an action or item is construed can make an indulgent goal or luxury product more appealing to the high hyperopia consumer by influencing its value in terms of an attractive long-term outcome. (c) 2008 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..
    Journal of Consumer Research 12/2008; 35(4):680-691. DOI:10.1086/592129 · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It has been suggested that research in schizophrenia is likely to benefit from a more symptom-focused approach, given the significant heterogeneity of presentation and pathophysiology (Bentall et al. 1988; Andreasen and Carpenter 1993; Costello 1993; Buchanan and Carpenter 1997). Research using a symptom-focused approach across diagnoses has already proceeded in some other symptom areas, such as the study of psychosis (Harrow et al. 1995) and thought disorder (Andreasen and Powers 1974; Harrow and Quinlan 1977). There is some support, to date, for the proposal that negative symptoms may represent a dimension of "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current analyses assess the functional correlates of negative symptoms across diagnoses and across time to assess the appropriateness of a dimensional approach to the study of negative symptoms--specifically, whether negative symptoms should be studied as a single construct across diagnostic groups. Seventy-two schizophrenia/schizoaffective, 36 other psychotic, and 42 nonpsychotic depressed patients were recruited at index hospitalization and were followed up 4.5, 7.5, and 10 years later. At each followup assessment, data were collected on symptoms and adaptive and cognitive functioning. Analyses indicated that negative symptoms showed some similar functional associates in all three diagnostic groups, although results were strongest for the schizophrenia spectrum patients. Negative symptoms at the 10-year followup were associated with different patterns of social deficits prior to index hospitalization in the three diagnostic groups. The data provide some support for a dimensional approach to the study of mental illness, with negative symptoms associated with deficits across diagnosis, but also provide evidence of some diagnostic differences.
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 02/2004; 30(4):813-25. DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007134 · 8.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we observed and linguistically analyzed the verbal behavior of six manic subjects, looking specifically for those linguistic capacities which were intact and for those which were disrupted. From interviews and tape-recordings of manic subjects in both analytic-protocol and discourse situations, we observed a preservation of basic speech capacities, including the ability to comprehend and generate grammatical sentences and to utilize highly complex linguistic transformations. We noted, however, a disruption in the ability to properly utilize ellipsis and semantic (discourse) anaphora such that manic subjects did not maintain a meaningful progression of thought in discourse.
    Brain and Language 05/1977; 4(2):208-18. DOI:10.1016/0093-934X(77)90018-9 · 3.22 Impact Factor
Show more


77 Reads
Available from