Cellular control of conjugation in Escherichia coli K12. Effect of chromosomal cpx mutations on F-plasmid gene expression
Department of Molecular Biology, Division of Biological Sciences Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y. 10461, U.S.A. Journal of Molecular Biology
(Impact Factor: 4.33).
DNA donor activity and surface exclusion of Escherichia coli F+ and Hfr strains require expression of both F-plasmid and chromosomal genes. The plasmid genes are contained in the 35,000 base tra region, where most of them are organized as a co-regulated gene block designated the traY → Z operon. The chromosomal genes have been identified among chromosomal mutants that fail to express donor activity and surface exclusion, even when they carry normal F-plasmid DNA. We show here that mutations in two chromosomal genes, cpxA and cpxB, together reduce the abundance of tra operon mRNA to 15% or less of the value in otherwise isogenic cpxA+cpxB+ cells. The cpxB1 mutation alone had no effect on the tra operon messenger RNA level, in agreement with previous evidence that this allele by itself is cryptic. We attribute the effect of both cpx mutations on tra operon mRNA to a transcriptional defect resulting from the inability of mutant cells to accumulate the traJ gene product, a 24,000 Mr outer membrane protein that is also required for efficient tra operon expression in vivo. Ultraviolet light-irradiated cpxA2 cpxB1 mutant cells infected with a λp(traJ) transducing bacteriophage that contains an intact traJ gene and its normal control sequences failed to accumulate the TraJ protein as a 24,000 Mr polypeptide, whereas cpxA+ cpxB1 cells, otherwise isogenic, did. In the same experimental system, both cpxA2 cpxB1 and cpxA+cpxB1 cells infected with the λp(traJ) bacteriophage accumulated comparable levels of RNA complementary to traJ. Moreover, cpxA2 cpxB1 and cpxA+ cpxB1 cells synthesized comparable levels of β-galactosidase from a traJ-lacZ protein fusion. These results show that the cpx mutations do not reduce transcription or translation initiation at traJ sequences. They define a new cellular contribution to conjugation, which we propose is related to the translocation of the TraJ protein to the outer membrane.
Available from: Stefanie L Vogt
- "Conversely, and parallel to results obtained here with BFP, cpxR mutations decrease Pap pilus elaboration even when the pap genes are expressed from an inducible promoter, an effect that has been attributed to diminished expression of periplasmic protein folding and degrading factors (Hung et al., 2001). Finally, similarly to curli and the Pap pilus, Cpx-mediated inhibition of elaboration of the conjugal F-pilus also occurs by transcriptional repression of the tra operon encoding F-pilus structural components (Sambucetti et al., 1982). In this case, however, the action of CpxR is indirect. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Cpx envelope stress response is induced by the misfolding of periplasmic proteins and restores envelope homeostasis by upregulating several periplasmic protein folding and degrading factors. The Cpx response also regulates the expression of a variety of envelope-spanning protein complexes, including flagella, secretion systems and pili, which play an important role in pathogenesis. In a previous study, we inactivated the Cpx response in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), a causative agent of infant diarrhoea, and observed decreased expression of its major adhesin, the bundle-forming pilus (BFP). Here, we examined the mechanism underlying this BFP expression defect, and found that this phenotype can be attributed to insufficient expression of periplasmic folding factors, such as DsbA, DegP and CpxP. Hence, a low level of Cpx pathway activity promotes BFP synthesis by upregulating factors important for folding of BFP component proteins. Conversely, we found that full induction of the Cpx response inhibits BFP expression, mainly by repressing transcription of the bfp gene cluster. In combination with a previous report examining EPEC type III secretion, our results demonstrate that the Cpx response co-ordinates the repression of cell-surface structures during periods of envelope stress.
Molecular Microbiology 04/2010; 76(5):1095-110. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07145.x · 4.42 Impact Factor
Available from: genetik.uni-bayreuth.de
- "F plasmid transfer gene expression also responds to nutritional signals through CRP and catabolite repression (Starcic et al., 2003). The Cpx (conjugative plasmid expression) locus was first identified by isolating mutations (cpx) that reduced levels of F transfer efficiency by preventing the accumulation of TraJ (Sambucetti et al., 1982). The Cpx regulon was later found to be an extracytoplasmic stress response system that responds to misfolding or overproduction of cell envelope components (Raivio and Silhavy, 2001). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Escherichia coli CpxAR two-component signal transduction system senses and responds to extracytoplasmic stress. The cpxA101* allele was previously found to reduce F plasmid conjugation by post-transcriptional inactivation of the positive activator TraJ. Microarray analysis revealed upregulation of the protease-chaperone pair, HslVU, which was shown to degrade TraJ in an E. coli C600 cpxA101* background. Double mutants of cpxA101* and hslV or hslU restored TraJ and F conjugation to wild-type levels. The constitutive overexpression of nlpE, an outer membrane lipoprotein that induces the Cpx stress response, also led to HslVU-mediated degradation of TraJ and repression of F transfer. However, Cpx-mediated TraJ degradation appears to be growth phase-dependent, as induction of nlpE in mid-log phase cells did not appreciably alter TraJ levels. Further, His6-TraJ was sensitive to HslVU degradation in vitro only when it was purified from cells overexpressing nlpE. Thus, TraJ appears to become resistant to HslVU during normal growth, with this resistance mapping to the F transfer region. Extracytoplasmic stress prevents this modification of TraJ, leaving it susceptible to HslVU. Thus, the CpxAR stress response indirectly controls the synthesis of the F mating apparatus, a complex transenvelope type IV secretion system, by degrading TraJ.
Molecular Microbiology 03/2008; 67(3):516-27. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06055.x · 4.42 Impact Factor
Available from: Lidia Sambucetti
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two major proteins, the murein lipoprotein and the OmpF matrix porin, are deficient in the outer membrane of cpxA cpxB mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. We present evidence that the cpx mutations prevent or retard the translocation of these proteins to the outer membrane. The mutations had no effect on the rate of lipoprotein synthesis. Mutant cells labeled for 5 min with radioactive arginine accumulated as much lipoprotein as otherwise isogenic cpxA+ cpxB+ cells. This lipoprotein accumulated as such; no material synthesized in mutant cells and reactive with antilipoprotein antibodies had the electrophoretic mobility of prolipoprotein. Hence, the initial stages of prolipoprotein insertion into the inner membrane leading to its cleavage to lipoprotein appeared normal. However, after a long labeling interval, mutant cells were deficient in free lipoprotein and lacked lipoprotein covalently bound to peptidoglycan, suggesting that little if any of the lipoprotein synthesized in mutant cells reaches the outer membrane. Immunoreactive OmpF protein could also be detected in extracts of mutant cells labeled for 5 min, but the amount that accumulated was severalfold less in mutant cells than in cpxA+ cpxB+ cells. Analysis of beta-galactosidase synthesis from ompF-lacZ fusion genes showed this difference to be the result of a reduced rate of ompF transcription in mutant cells. Even so, little or none of the ompF protein synthesized in mutant cells was incorporated into the outer membrane.
Journal of Bacteriology 05/1983; 154(1):375-82. · 2.81 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.