Assessment by attending physicians of a seminar method to improve clinical teaching.

Journal of medical education 01/1985; 59(12):944-50. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198412000-00004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The authors in this article present assessments by attending physicians of a seminar method to improve clinical teaching. An experimental study was conducted to determine whether or not the seminar method (a) is perceived by attending physicians as beneficial, (b) modifies the physicians' attitudes toward teaching, (c) enables attending physicians to define needed teaching changes, (d) motivates them to improve their teaching performance, and (e) is perceived as having long-term benefits. Forty-six inpatient attending physicians from four California institutions participated in the study. The physicians were randomly assigned to an experimental group which attended a seminar on clinical teaching or to a control group which received no such intervention. Questionnaires completed by the physicians indicated that the teachers who experienced the seminar method perceived it as beneficial, improved their attitudes toward clinical teaching, determined needed teaching changes, attempted to implement new teaching approaches, and perceived long-term benefits.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A minority of programs in family medicine have an educationally sound training and evaluation system for chief residents. We have developed a brief faculty development intervention for family medicine chief residents aimed at improving administrative and education skills. The workshop addresses six important areas in administration, management, and education: job descriptions, style differences in teacher and learner, managing the morning report and small‐group learning, administrative model for leadership, performance evaluation and feedback, and dealing with the learner in need. Residents rated the quality and relevance of the workshop components on 5‐point Likert scales as 4.25 and 4.13, respectively. They rated their perceived knowledge gain on a 5‐point Likert scale as 4.13. The mean objective test scores of knowledge, before and after the workshop, were 53.9 and 77.4 (p = .0001). Thus, it was concluded that a brief workshop for chief residents can have a favorable impact on resident knowledge concerning important topics in education and administration and recommend that residency program administrators give further attention to the training and faculty development of chief residents—our academic colleagues of the future.
    Teaching and Learning in Medicine 01/1995; 7(2):111-114. · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Teacher's attitude domain, a pivotal aspect of clinical teaching, is missing in the Stanford Faculty Development Program Questionnaire (SFDPQ), the most widely used student-based assessment method of clinical teaching skills. This study was conducted to develop and validate the teacher's attitude domain and evaluate the validity and internal consistency reliability of the augmented SFDPQ. Items generated for the new domain included teacher's enthusiasm, sobriety, humility, thoroughness, empathy, and accessibility. The study involved 20 resident doctors assessed once by 64 medical students using the augmented SFDPQ. Construct validity was explored using correlation among the different domains and a global rating scale. Factor analysis was performed. The response rate was 94%. The new domain had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89, with 1-factor solution explaining 57.1% of its variance. It showed the strongest correlation to the global rating scale (rho = 0.71). The augmented SFDPQ, which had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93, correlated better (rho = 0.72, p < 0.00001) to the global rating scale than the original SFDPQ (rho = 0.67, p < 0.00001). The new teacher's attitude domain exhibited good internal consistency and construct and factorial validity. It enhanced the content and construct validity of the SFDPQ. The validated construct of the augmented SFDPQ is recommended for design and evaluation of basic and continuing clinical teaching programs.
    Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 01/2014; 34(1):13-24. · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Learning an innovative teaching method such as a problem-based learning is difficult for most faculty members because the method is based upon assumptions about learning that are often at variance with their beliefs. Faculty development can challenge assumptions about learning, provide experience with a new technique, and offer specific pedagogical skills that are needed to succeed as a tutor. A comprehensive approach to faculty development, derived from the literature in higher education, would include: instructional development, professional development, leadership development, and organizational development. Research on faculty development indicates positive results of such efforts. Faculty members who choose to learn about problem-based learning appear to progress through predictable stages of development that include: understanding and valuing the rationale for problem-based learning, acquiring general and content-specific tutor knowledge and skills, developing advanced skills in problem-based learning, and developing leadership and scholarship skills. Each of these steps, plus organizational vitality, are described along with recommendations for implementing such programs. Finally, five models of faculty development derived from medical schools with problem-based learning curricula are examined.
    Advances in Health Sciences Education 01/1996; 1(1):69-81. · 2.71 Impact Factor