Article

Urinary excretion of chlorpheniramine and its metabolites in children.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Impact Factor: 3.01). 06/1984; 73(5):595-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of chlorpheniramine were studied in 11 patients, aged 6-16 years, with allergic rhinitis. In these children, chlorpheniramine had a mean elimination half-life of 13.1 +/- 6.6 h, a mean clearance rate of 7.23 +/- 3.16 mL/min/kg, and a mean apparent volume of distribution of 7.0 +/- 2.8 L/kg. Over 48 h, the recovery in urine was as follows: chlorpheniramine, 11.3 +/- 6.7%; demethylchlorpheniramine , 23.3 +/- 11.1%; and didemethylchlorpheniramine , 9.6 +/- 9.4%. Urine flow rate and urine pH were uncontrolled and ranged from 2.2 to 113.3 mL/h and 5.1-7.9, respectively, over the 48-h period. In some children urine flow rate and pH were constant, while in others there was great variability. When drug and metabolite excretion rates versus both urine flow rates and pH values were analyzed by multiple linear regression, the results were significantly better (p less than or equal to 0.05) than when each factor was analyzed independently. The excretion rate of chlorpheniramine and its two demethylated metabolites decreased as urine pH increased and urine flow rate decreased. This information must be considered in future pharmacokinetic studies of this drug.

0 Followers
 · 
70 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Subsensitivity to H1-receptor antagonists has been attributed to autoinduction of enzyme systems and increased clearance rates during chronic drug administration. We studied the changes in serum half-life values and clearance rates in dogs who were administered hydroxyzine, 0.7 mg/kg, intramuscularly, daily, for 150 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of drug administration, and on days 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150. The mean serum half-life value on day 30, 60, and 120 was significantly longer (p less than 0.05) than that of 2.4 +/- 0.3 hours obtained on day 1. The mean clearance values obtained on days 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 were significantly slower (p less than 0.05) than the value of 25.12 +/- 4.13 ml/min/kg obtained on day 1 but were not significantly different from each other. Mean serum hydroxyzine concentrations were often significantly higher on the later study days than on day 1. The mean apparent volume of distribution values obtained on days 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 did not differ significantly from the value of 5.0 +/- 1.5 L/kg obtained on day 1. This study adds to the mounting evidence that subsensitivity to the effects of an H1-receptor antagonist is not due to autoinduction of enzyme systems, more rapid clearance of the drug, and lower concentrations of the drug in serum and tissue.
    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 07/1987; 79(6):928-32. DOI:10.1016/0091-6749(87)90242-9 · 11.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ebastine is a new piperidine-containing, relatively nonsedating second-generation H1-receptor antagonist. In a double-blind, parallel-group study of a single 5 mg or 10 mg dose of ebastine syrup used to treat allergic rhinitis in 20 children aged 6 to 12 years, we tested the hypothesis that the medication would have a duration of action of at least 24 hours. We measured plasma concentrations of carebastine, the pharmacologically active metabolite of ebastine, and the wheals and flares produced by epicutaneous tests with histamine phosphate, 1.0 mg/ml. Ebastine was absorbed well; peak carebastine concentrations occurred approximately 3 hours after dosing. Mean plasma elimination half-life values of carebastine ranged from 10 to 14 hours. The pharmacokinetics of carebastine were linear and dose independent in the dosage range studied. After the 5 or 10 mg dose, there were no significant differences between mean plasma elimination half-life values, mean oral clearance values, or mean apparent volumes of distribution. Mean peak plasma carebastine concentrations and mean areas under the plasma carebastine concentration-time curve after the 10 mg dose were 1.93 and 1.76 times, respectively, the values obtained after the 5 mg dose. Both doses significantly reduced the histamine-induced wheal-and-flare areas for up to 28 hours compared with predose values. The differences in effect between the doses generally were not statistically or clinically significant. No adverse effects were noted. We conclude that ebastine, an effective H1-receptor antagonist with a prompt onset of action and a long duration of action, is suitable for once-daily administration to children.
    Journal of Pediatrics 05/1993; 122(4):641-6. DOI:10.1016/S0022-3476(05)83555-3 · 3.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of concomitant administration of the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the H1-receptor antagonists chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine were studied in rabbits. A single dose of chlorpheniramine 10 mg (Group A) or diphenhydramine 10 mg (Group B) was given intravenously on three different study days as follows: 2 weeks before cimetidine administration, after giving cimetidine 100 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours for one week, and two weeks after discontinuing the cimetidine. Serum chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine concentrations were measured by HPLC. Histamine H1-blockade was assessed by measuring suppression of the histamine-induced wheals in the skin. The chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine terminal elimination half-life values and area under the curve values were significantly increased, and the systemic clearance rates were significantly decreased, during concomitant administration of cimetidine. For each H1-receptor antagonist, pharmacokinetic parameters were similar before cimetidine was co-administered and two weeks after cimetidine was discontinued. Wheal suppression produced by chlorpheniramine or diphenhydramine was increased and prolonged when cimetidine was administered concomitantly. Any enhanced peripheral H1-blockade observed could be attributed, at least in part, to a pharmacokinetic interaction.
    Pharmaceutical Research 03/1996; 13(2):301-4. DOI:10.1023/A:1016011702703 · 3.95 Impact Factor