The relative efficacy of four methods of human milk expression.

Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Early Human Development (Impact Factor: 1.93). 05/1982; 6(2):153-9. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3782(82)90102-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In view of the current trend toward increased breast-feeding, both of normal term infants as well as sick or premature infants, a successful means for milk expression in order to establish and maintain lactation is of major importance to the mother. The present study was designed to evaluate four methods of milk expression, measuring the amount as well s the fat content of milk expressed by each method during a 10-min period. The four methods included the Egnell electric pump, the Loyd B pump, the Evenflo system, and manual expression. The electric pump enabled mothers to express significantly more milk with adequate fat content during the expression period than any of the other methods tested. No significant differences were found between the other three methods. The Egnell or similar electric pump may be a preferred method for milk expression for some mothers, particularly those anticipating a prolonged need for pumping.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The benefits of human milk for preterm infants are widely recognized, yet technological advances in milk expression have been slow. We compared the efficacy of a standard electric pump (EP; Egnell) used in 94% of United Kingdom neonatal units with a novel manual pump (MP; Avent ISIS) designed to operate more physiologically by simulating the infant's compressive action on the areola during breastfeeding. Methods We randomized 145 women who delivered infants of < 35 weeks’ gestation to use the MP or the EP and measured total milk volume expressed while using the randomized pump during the infant's hospital stay, pattern of milk output and creamatocrit of milk expressed during a test period in the second week, and pump characteristics by maternal questionnaire. Results Mothers who used the EP, who frequently double pumped, showed shorter expression times but produced no more milk than mothers who used the MP. When both pumped sequentially, however, mothers who used the MP showed significantly greater milk flow and total volume over 20 minutes. Creamatocrit was unaffected by pump type. The MP was rated significantly higher than the EP on 5 major characteristics. Conclusions When compared on equal terms (sequential pumping), mothers who used the MP showed greater milk flow, perhaps reflecting more physiologic pump design. Even with double pumping, mothers who used the EP did not advantage their infants with greater milk production. We believe that this novel, effective MP, preferred by mothers and costing a fraction of the EP price, reflects a significant advance in milk expression for high-risk infants. breast pumps, randomized trial, preterm infants.
    La Revue Sage-Femme 09/2004; 3(4):163-173. DOI:10.1016/S1637-4088(04)72239-7
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mechanical characteristics of breast pumps have been shown to influence milk extraction and hormone release in laboratory settings. However, few studies evaluate impact of differences in pump design on long-term breastfeeding success. This study evaluated the impact of a novel pump design on milk extraction, milk fat content, maternal hormone response, maternal satisfaction, long-term milk production, and duration of breastfeeding following return to the workforce. Healthy women intending to return to work or school and to breastfeed exclusively for <or=4 months were enrolled in late pregnancy (n = 62). Prolactin response to pumping (n = 30) and changes in 24-hour milk volume during a 2-week stimulation protocol (n = 59) were measured in women randomly assigned to a novel (Embrace, Playtex, Westport, CT) or standard (Pump In Style, Medela, Baar, Switzerland) electric breast pump. Milk extraction efficiency (n = 58) and maternal ranking of pump performance (n = 56) were measured using a crossover design. Mothers selected one pump to keep and were contacted (n = 55) at 6 months postpartum to determine breastfeeding behavior. Prolactin response was greater (p = 0.005) with the novel pump. Milk extraction efficiency was greater (p = 0.001) with the standard pump. Stimulation of 24-hour milk production did not differ between pumps. Women were equally likely to select the two pumps. Feeding behavior at 6 months was not related to pump choice. The test pumps stimulate the two arms of the homeostatic mechanism governing milk output (endocrine stimulation and degree of breast emptying) to different degrees, yet have comparable impacts on lactation performance over time.
    Breastfeeding Medicine 03/2009; 4(1):17-23. DOI:10.1089/bfm.2008.0133 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to identify if special breast cleansing before breast pumping would have an affect on lowering bacterial colony counts of cultured breast milk. Sixty-five women whose infants were being cared for in a NICU and who wished to pump their breasts for future breast milk feedings were randomly assigned to one of two groups: members of a control group were instructed to wash their hands thoroughly before breast pumping, and members of an experimental group were instructed to wash their hands thoroughly and were given special instructions on breast cleansing. All other breast pumping and milk collection instructions for both groups remained the same. A student's t-test revealed a significant difference between the two groups; women who performed special breast cleansing before breast pumping had significantly lower bacterial colony counts in their cultured breast milks.
    Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 05/1989; 18(3):231-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1989.tb00484.x · 1.20 Impact Factor