Computed tomography for follow-up of chronic aortic dissections.

Radiology (Impact Factor: 6.21). 07/1981; 139(3):655-60. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.139.3.7232732
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients who have chronic dissections of the aorta are prone to re-dissection, extension of dissection, aortic aneurysm, and aortic rupture. Computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement provides a convenient, noninvasive method for follow-up of these patients. We used CT in a group of twelve patients who were treated for aortic dissection. CT demonstrated re-dissection, aneurysmal dilation of the aorta, and delayed filling of the false lumen. CT also showed persistent patency of the false lumen in almost all of the postoperative cases.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ultrafast computed tomography (CT) is a new imaging technique that relies on electron beam technology. Its rapid image acquisition speeds make it ideal for evaluating the cardiovascular system. The high-resolution, flow, and cine-modes are unique and provide complimentary information about cardiovascular anatomy, function, and flow dynamics. Ultrafast CT can provide quantitative measurements of cardiac output, ejection fraction, ventricular volumes, and ventricular mass as well as evaluation of segmental cardiac function. This technique can be used to assess coronary artery bypass graft patency as well as to screen for coronary artery calcium. Intracardiac thrombus or tumor, valvular disease, and disorders of the pericardium can be evaluated and characterized using ultrafast CT. The diagnosis of congenital lesions of the heart and great vessels is facilitated by this imaging modality, which can help determine complex anatomic abnormalities and quantitate shunt lesions. Acquired lesions of the great vessels, such as aortic dissection and aneurysm, can be diagnosed by ultrafast CT, which can also be used for serial examination and conservative management.
    International Journal of Cardiac Imaging 02/1992; 8(4):289-302. DOI:10.1007/BF01146028
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of computed tomography (CT) versus aortography is evaluated in a limited study of 17 cases of aortic dissection (AD). With the constraints of the present state of the technology and lack of availability of CT scanners at some centers, aortography remains the premier and often the only diagnostic test to choose in an emergency. CT, however, may be an asset in the diagnosis of AD when: (1) atypical or misleading clinical presentations are evident that do not require aortography; (2) aortography is contraindicated in a weakened patient, when there is no emergency; (3) aortography is a risk while there is a strong suggestion of AD; (4) patency of a false channel must be confirmed. These circumstances were encountered in five patients. In addition, a localized infrarenal AD was fortuitously discovered in two patients presenting with abdominal visceral cancer. On patient follow-up, CT is less invasive and may be performed in asymptomatic patients undergoing treatment, thereby facilitating the early detection of complications. Detailed computed tomograms often yield superior diagnostic information only if the CT study includes rapid sequential scans immediately following a fast intravenous bolus of contrast material.
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 12/1982; 5(6):285-291. DOI:10.1007/BF02552799 · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The fate of the false lument of a type-B aortic dissection was studied using computed tomography (CT) in a 64-year-old woman with hypertension. The CT follow-up showed the disappearance of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta, shrinkage and thrombosis of the false channel in the proximal abdominal aorta (in these sections no major vesel arose from the false lumen), and persistence of the false lumen in the distal abdominal aorta, where the right common iliac artery arose from the false lumen. Such different findings at the various levels of dissection have not been described previously, and confirm the presumption that the fate of dissection depends on the blood flow in the false channel.
    European Radiology 08/1993; 3(4):376-379. DOI:10.1007/BF00167473 · 4.34 Impact Factor