Article

Limitation of the cross table lateral view in detecting cervical spine injuries: a retrospective analysis.

Annals of Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.33). 11/1981; 10(10):508-13. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198209000-00112
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A city-wide survey of 17 emergency departments revealed that 94.7% of physicians relied exclusively on the cross table lateral view in their initial radiologic disposition of patients suspected of having cervical spine injury, and most of these physicians think it is more than 90% effective in detecting potentially unstable injuries of the cervical spine. A three-year retrospective study was conducted in a midwestern suburban community hospital with 27,000 annual emergency visits to determine the incidence of false negative cross table lateral views of the cervical spine. Of 35 patients with cervical spine fracture/dislocation, we found three cases difficult to diagnose, and six in which this initial view was interpreted as normal. In all nine cases, a standard anteroposterior view (APV) or standard open mouth view (OMV) would have increased the diagnostic yield to 100%. A revised radiologic approach to the patient suspected of having cervical spine injuries is suggested.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
68 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die HWS-Distorsion ist von großer klinischer und sozioökonomischer Bedeutung. Eine Vielzahl von Problemen im Hinblick auf Diagnostik, Klassifikation, Therapie und Begutachtung sind bis heute nicht oder nur unzureichend gelöst. Ziel der vorliegenden Umfrage war es den aktuellen Stand des Vorgehens beim Vorliegen einer akuten HWS-Distorsion an chirurgischen und unfallchirurgischen Kliniken in Deutschland zu evaluieren. Es wurden 1568 Kliniken in Deutschland angeschrieben und um die Beantwortung eines standardisierten, einseitigen Fragebogens zur Diagnostik, Klassifikation und Therapie der HWS-Distorsion gebeten. Zudem wurde nach der subjektiven Einschätzung der Ärzte zum Beschwerdebild gefragt. Beantwortet wurden 540 (34,44%) Fragebögen. Bezüglich der klinischen Untersuchung besteht Konsens. Konventionelle Röntgenaufnahmen der HWS in 2 Ebenen werden routinemäßig in 82,6% der Kliniken indiziert. Für die Anordnung von Funktionsaufnahmen (durchschnittlichen 39,1%) ergibt sich ein sehr inhomogenes Bild. HWS-Distorsionen werden in 68,9% der Kliniken nicht, in 13,2% nach der ,,Quebec Task Force“ und in 13,9% nach Erdmann klassifiziert. Die HWS-Krawatte gehört in 85,6% zum therapeutischen Vorgehen; 30% der Patienten wird lediglich eine Krawatte verordnet, 55,6% erhalten zusätzlich Physiotherapie. Bei 8,3% wird nur Krankengymnastik verordnet. Nach der subjektiven Einschätzung der Ärzte sind psychologische Faktoren für chronische Verläufe, nicht aber für die Akutphase von Bedeutung. Die große Variabilität der Maßnahmen zur Diagnostik, Klassifikation und Behandlung an deutschen Kliniken spiegelt die bekannten Probleme im Umgang mit dem Beschwerdebild der HWS-Distorsion wieder. Aktuelle wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse zur funktionellen Behandlung sind bisher nur in begrenztem Maße in den klinischen Alltag übernommen worden.
    Der Unfallchirurg 04/2004; 107(4). · 0.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Clearing the cervical spine in polytrauma patients still presents a challenge for the trauma team. The risk of an overlooked cervical spine injury is substantial since these patients show painful and lifethreatening injuries to one or more organ systems so that clinical examination is usually not reliable. A generally approved guideline to assess the cervical spine in polytrauma patients might significantly reduce delays in diagnosis, but a consistent protocol for evaluating the cervical spine has not been uniformly accepted or performed by clinicians. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the diagnostic algorithm at this trauma center and to propose a possible consensus of the optimal method for clearing the cervical spine in polytrauma patients. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of all polytrauma patients with cervical spine injuries (n = 118) who were admitted to this level-I trauma center between 1980 and 2004. All patients were assessed following the trauma algorithm of our unit (modified by Nast-Kolb). Standard radiological evaluation of the cervical spine consisted of a single lateral view or a three-view cervical spine series. Further radiological examinations (functional flexion/extension views, oblique views, CT-scan, MRI) were performed by clinical suspicion of an injury or when indicated by the standard radiographs. Results: Correct diagnosis was made in 107 patients (91%) during primary trauma evaluation, whereas in 11 patients (9%) our approach to clear the cervical spine failed to detect significant cervical spine injuries: In six cases skeletal injuries were missed because only a lateral view of the cervical spine was performed during primary trauma evaluation and in one case because a three-view cervical spine series did not show the extent of the injury. In four cases discoligamentous injuries were missed despite complete sets of standard radiographs and a CT-scan, but missing functional flexion/ extension views. Conclusion: For assessment of the cervical spine in poly-trauma patients we recommend a three-view trauma series as minimum to clear the cervical spine and the more liberal use of CT-scan as standard diagnostic tool in a specific subset of patients with clinically suspected cervical spine injuries and significant trauma history. In those patients also, passive functional flexion/ extension views should be considered as obligate in later stages of diagnostic algorithm.
    European Journal of Trauma 01/2006; 32(6):570-575.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High-quality resuscitation and care during transfer of head-injured patients is essential to prevent secondary brain injury. We have prospectively assessed the standard of resuscitation in 50 consecutive head-injured patients transferred to our unit, and compared our findings with previous studies performed before the advanced trauma life support course (ATLS) had become widespread and national guidelines on the transfer of head injuries had been produced by the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI). Delays in transfer, management of the airway, adequate cervical spine assessment, hypoxia (PaO2
    Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured - INJURY-INT J CARE INJURED. 01/2003; 34(11):834-838.