Article

Role of aminoacylation of histidyl-tRNA in the regulation of protein degradation in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Journal of Biological Chemistry (Impact Factor: 4.6). 08/1980; 255(13):6322-9.
Source: PubMed

Full-text

Available from: James S Malter, Apr 18, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
45 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases play a dual role in cell metabolism by synthesizing aminoacyl-tRNAs and an odd dinucleotide diadenosine-5′, 5′′′-P1, P4-tetraphosphate which appears to be involved in DNA replication and the control of cell proliferation. This review is a synthesis of recent results on the structure, genetics, cell biology, physiology, role in neoplasia, and role in autoimmune myositis of the higher eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.
    Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 08/1986; 71(2). DOI:10.1007/BF00214769 · 2.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the possibility that heat-induced protein degradation may play a role in heat killing of mammalian cells, we have compared cellular survival and protein degradation rates for cells treated with cycloheximide, puromycin, or histidinol. These three compounds all inhibit protein synthesis and protect against the lethal effects of heat shock. When cells were treated with histidinol for 2 h before heating, as well as during heating at 43°C for 3 h, they became resistant to heat killing. Histidinol treatment (5 mM) induced a 10,000-fold increase in surviving fraction from 10−5 to 10−1, and the protective effect was similar to that of 0 × 1 mM cycloheximide or 0 × 2 mM puromycin. Despite the similarity in heat protection for the three compounds, the protein degradation rate of 1 ±8%/h at 37°C was increasedby 34% by histidinol and decreased 20% by cycloheximide or puromycin. At 43°C none of these compounds had a significant effect on the protein degradation rate. Therefore the intracellular degradation of relatively long-lived proteins does not appear to play a significant role in either heat killing or the phenomenon of heat protection. Instead, since maximum protection from heat killing was observed for all three compounds when protein synthesis was inhibited by 90–95%, heat protection probably results from an event(s) that is caused by inhibition of protein synthesis.
    International Journal of Hyperthermia 01/1990; 6(3):591-595. DOI:10.3109/02656739009140955 · 2.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The bulk of cellular protein in hepatocytes is sequestered and degraded by two classes of autophagy, (a) an overt or macro form, and (b) microautophagy. Macroautophagy is rapidly induced by amino acid deprivation and the administration of glucagon and suppressed by amino acids and insulin. Amino acids appear to be its primary regulator since liver perfusion studies have shown that it can be inhibited almost completely and proteolysis decreased from maximal (4.5% hr) to basal rates (1.7%/hr) by 4 times normal plasma amino acid concentrations. The resulting alterations in the aggregate volume of autophagic vacuoles are associated with proportional changes in the amount of cytoplasmic protein sequestered and in rates of protein degradation. Since the apparent turnover of autophagic vacuoles is 0.087 min-1, the pools of sequestered protein at all levels of macroautophagic stimulation are sufficient to account fully for the observed rates of accelerated rate of proteolysis. Microautophagy differs from the former in that the cytoplasmic 'bite' is smaller and it is not subject to acute physiological regulation. It is, however, dramatically decreased to near zero during refeeding after prior starvation. These and other findings indicate that it is adaptively regulated, possibly as a consequence of alterations in the amount of smooth endoplasmic reticulum. The amino acid control of accelerated protein degradation appears to involve direct inhibition by a small group of amino acids (Leu, Tyr/Phe, Gln, Pro, Met, Trp, and His) and the permissive action of alanine. Of unusual interest is the fact that, whereas the inhibitory amino acid group evokes responses identical to a complete amino acid mixture at 0.5x and 4x normal amino acid concentrations, it loses its effectiveness at normal levels; similar responses have been shown for leucine alone. The loss of effectiveness at normal concentrations is abolished by the addition of 0.5 mM alanine which by itself is not directly inhibitory. No other amino acid can replace alanine. These findings suggest a novel role for alanine that could be of importance in linking energy demands to proteolysis. A hypothetical model for proteolytic regulation by leucine and the other inhibitory amino acids is presented.
    Advances in Enzyme Regulation 01/1986; 25:257-76. DOI:10.1016/0065-2571(86)90018-X