Para-aortic lymphocyst

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.7). 11/1980; 138(4):395-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90135-0
Source: PubMed


Although numerous articles regarding the etiology, incidence, complications, and management of pelvic lymphocysts have been published in the American literature since 1958, there has been no mention of para-aortic lymphocyst as a complication of para-aortic node dissection. Two recent cases of symptomatic para-aortic lymphocyst have prompted a review of our para-aortic node dissection technique when this procedure is not combined with a more extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy. Our modification in technique is to use retroperitoneal para-aortic drainage by constant pressure-controlled suction following closure of the posterior parietal peritoneum, and the results in our first 15 patients are presented. There were no complications related to the drainage technique. Abdominal ultrasound and intravenous urography have proved to be excellent diagnostic tools in the initial evaluation and subsequent follow-up of para-aortic lymphocytes.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A unique case of a large retroperitoneal lymphocyst producing lateral ureteric displacement is presented. The value of lymphangiography in establishing the diagnosis is stressed.
    Urologic Radiology 02/1983; 5(2):123-5. DOI:10.1007/BF02926785
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A patient is presented in whom a lymphocele developed after a retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for Stage II embryonal carcinoma of the testicle. The benign nature of this lymphocele has been confirmed not only by the diagnostic procedures outlined, but by its stability over a 42-month follow-up period with no further antitumor therapy. We conclude from reviewing the literature that while aggressive measures are necessary to confirm the diagnosis of a lymphocele, its management should be expectant. If significant obstruction of neighboring structures occurs, an attempt at percutaneous drainage (and possibly sclerosis) seems appropriate despite potential risks of interventional treatment such as hemorrhage and introduction of infection. Open procedures for marsupialization and drainage should be reserved for cases in which more conservative measures fail.
    Cancer 03/1986; 57(4):871-4. DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19860215)57:4<871::AID-CNCR2820570431>3.0.CO;2-C · 4.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In patients treated for ovarian cancer it is crucial to distinguish recurrent malignancy from a benign process. Presented herein is a patient who developed bilateral pelvic lymphoceles following a second-look laparotomy for ovarian cancer. Indications for surgical intervention are discussed and the preferred surgical approach is outlined.
    Gynecologic Oncology 04/1988; 29(3):382-4. DOI:10.1016/0090-8258(88)90240-5 · 3.77 Impact Factor
Show more