Dynamics of EEG background activity level within quiet sleep in successive cycles in infants.

Dipartimento di Teoria, Storia e Ricerca Sociale, Università di Trento, Italy.
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 02/1995; 94(1):6-11. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00227-C
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We investigated in infants the emergence of the trends of the EEG synchronization throughout quiet sleep (QS) as a function of the QS rank. The night sleep of 3 groups with 6 subjects each (aged respectively 9-18 weeks, 21-47 weeks, and 16-45 years) was recorded. A parameter value reflecting the degree of synchronization of the EEG background activity for successive epochs was computed by automatic analysis. For each QS phase 3 indicators of the dynamics of the time course of the EEG parameter activity were determined: the range (difference between the EEG parameter value at the beginning of the QS episode and that at the trough), the trough latency (after QS onset), and the rate of synchronization (range/trough latency). The range and the trough latency increased with age, whereas the rate of synchronization decreased. The range and the rate of synchronization decreased in the successive cycles, whereas the trough latency increased. These results provide further support for the hypothesis of the early emergence of the process S mechanisms and suggest that the framework of the 2-process model could account also for the development of both the EEG background activity dynamics and the sleep-wake organization.


Available from: Patricio Peirano, Apr 27, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study reported in this paper investigated the dynamics of EEG background activity during quiet sleep (QS) in the first year of life. These dynamics have been previously shown to follow an intra-sleep trend within a single sleep episode, and the aim of this study was to show whether they were similar in two successive nocturnal sleep episodes interrupted by a waking episode, or whether they exhibited a progressive trend across the two episodes. The polygraphic recordings of two groups of 6 infants aged from 9 to 15 weeks old and from 25 to 47 weeks old, whose nocturnal sleep organisation was spontaneously interrupted, were selected. Three indicators of the time course of the parameter value, obtained from automatic analysis and reflecting the degree of synchronisation of the EEG activity recorded by the centro-occipital lead, were computed for the first two QS periods of two successive sleep episodes: the parameter range (difference between the EEG parameter value at the QS onset and that at the trough); the trough latency (time interval between QS onset and trough); and rate of synchronisation (range/trough latency). All 3 indicators differed between the first and the second QS period of both sleep episodes independently of age. The rate of synchronisation (but not the parameter range and the trough latency) was higher in the first sleep episode than in the second one, showing an over-night decreasing trend. Those results show that, when nocturnal sleep in infants is split into two episodes separated by an intervening waking, also the second sleep episode displays an internal organisation of its EEG dynamics. Moreover, an across-night trend in the rate of synchronisation can be observed from an early age, a finding which suggests, again, the early emergence of homeostatic regulation of sleep.
    Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 12/1997; 103(6):621-6. DOI:10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00076-X
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty-four hour sleep patterns were measured in six healthy male volunteers during a 90-minute short sleep-wake (SW 30:60) cycle protocol for 48 hours. Sleep pressure estimates (amount of Slow Wave Sleep [SWS], SWA, and Rate of Synchronization [RoS: the rate of SWA build-up at the beginning of the NREM period]) were compared with the 24-hour patterns of body temperature (Tb24) and sleep propensity. A moderate sleep debt was incurred over the 48 hour study as indicated by decreased levels of 24 hour sleep. On day 1, ultradian patterns of REM and SWS sleep were prominent; on day 2, more prominent were circadian patterns of REM sleep, SWS, Sleep Latency, TST and Tb24. Also on Day 2, biphasic patterns of SWA and RoS were expressed, with peaks occurring during the falling and rising limbs of Tb24. The biphasic peaks in SWA and RoS may be associated with phase-specific interactions of the circadian pacemaker with the sleep homeostat during conditions of moderate sleep pressure. Further research is needed to replicate the finding and to identify biological factors that may underlie the twelve hour pattern in SWA.
    Archives italiennes de biologie 12/2009; 147(4):117-30. · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The issue of the relationship between sleep and development could be posed in the following terms: (1) does sleep have a function for development? and (2) which is the specificity of sleep function during development? Is it possible to assess critical ages of emergence and decline of specific sleep functions? The results of recent investigations related to the so-called ontogenetic hypothesis for the function of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep will be reviewed; suggestions are put forward concerning the possible role of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Because of the difficulties to provoke long-lasting sleep deprivation in humans during development, two different approaches were used. The results of one set of analyses concerned the secretion of growth hormone during sleep under normal and pathological conditions and the relationship between sleep organization and nutritional supply utilisation in infants and children. The second approach aimed at investigating the long-term development of children suffering from sleep abnormalities at earlier ages. Furthermore, the role of dreaming during development will be discussed. The data summarized here only partly support the function of sleep during development; we would like to underscore the difficulty to dissociate the function of sleep from that of waking.
    Behavioural Brain Research 07/1995; 69(1-2):23-7. DOI:10.1016/0166-4328(95)00022-L · 3.39 Impact Factor