P-VEBEC: a new 8-weekly schedule with or without rG-CSF for elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Molinette, Torino, Italy.
Annals of Oncology (Impact Factor: 6.58). 12/1994; 5(10):895-900.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chemotherapy regimens devised for elderly patients with intermediate-high grade NHL are a matter of discussion. The aim is to reduce general toxicity without loosing an antilymphoma effect. The most important limiting factor of chemotherapy is myelotoxicity; for this reason the use of growth factor may be useful in these patients.
From November '91 to November '92, 67 pts older than 65 years with intermediate-and high-grade advanced-stage NHL were treated with the P-VEBEC regimen, an original scheme with epirubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7; vinblastine 5 mg/m2 and bleomycin 5 mg/m2 on weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, prednisone 50 mg/m2/day p. os in the first 2 weeks and thereafter every other day. Twenty-eight pts received r-GSF 5 micrograms/kg/day throughout the treatment starting on day 2 of every week for 4 consecutive days. Their median age was 71 years (65-80), 31 pts were male and 36 female, histology according W.F. was D 6; E 17; F 16; G 19; H 9. Twenty-five percent of pts had B symptoms, 35% had bulky disease, 41% LDH level > normal, 44% stage IV and 26% had B.M. involvement.
C.R. was achieved by 66% of pts. Adverse prognostic factors for CR were E histology, stage IV, bone marrow infiltration and LDH above normal. Severe toxicity was never recorded, no toxic death was observed. With a median follow-up of 24 months OS, DFS and EFS were 55%, 52%, and 33%, respectively. EFS was influenced by stage, BM involvement and level of LDH. The relative dose intensity (RDI) was calculated by the method of Hryniuk and Bush. Patients who received rG-CSF had a significantly higher median RDI (94% vs 79%) and lower myelotoxicity (neutrophil nadir < 500 18% vs 56%). The rate of CR was influenced by RDI > 80% (89% vs 56%). EFS was also better in pts who received a RDI higher than 80% (50% vs 18% p = 0.05).
P-VEBEC is a feasible cycle in elderly patients; the use of rG-CSF improves RDI. In patients with adverse prognostic factors (BM involvement, poor performance status) a RDI > 0.80 could play a role in improving the outcome.