Article

Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Journal of Dental Research (Impact Factor: 4.14). 10/1995; 74(9):1591-6. DOI: 10.1177/00220345950740091401
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Since the mode of failure of resin composites bonded to ceramics has frequently been reported to be cohesive fracture of either ceramic or resin composite rather than separation at the adhesive interface, this study was designed to question the validity of shear bond strength tests. The reasons for such a failure mode are identified and an alternative tensile bond strength test evaluated. Three configurations (A, conventional; B, reversed; and C, all composite) of the cylinder-on-disc design were produced for shear bond strength testing. Two-dimensional finite element stress analysis (FEA) was carried out to determine qualitatively the stress distribution for the three configurations. A tensile bond strength test was designed and used to evaluate two ceramic repair systems, one using hydrofluoric acid (HF) and the other acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF). Results from the shear bond strength tests and FEA showed that this particular test has as its inherent feature the measurement of the strength of the base material rather than the strength of the adhesive interface. In the tensile test, failure invariably occurred in the adhesive layer, with HF and APF showing a similar ability to improve the bond of resin composite to ceramic. It is concluded that the tensile bond strength test is more appropriate for evaluating the adhesive capabilities of resin composites to ceramics.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
576 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Enhancement of bond strength between new and old composite usually requires increased surface roughness of old composite to promote mechanical interlocking and subsequent coating with bonding agents to improve surface wetting and chemical bonding. So this study was carried out to evaluate and compare the effects of different surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite repairs The mode of failure of repaired composites whether cohesive or adhesive was also evaluated. The substrates for 60 composite specimens were fabricated and aged with water treatment and subjected to various surface treatments. The surface treatment regimens used in the study were: No surface treatment, abraded with diamond bur, air abraded (sandblasted) with 50 µ aluminum oxide particles. Specimens were then repaired with fresh composite using either Clearfil(™) repair or all-bond two adhesive systems. Specimens were water stored, thermocycled and tested for SBS using universal testing machine. Fractured specimens were then examined under stereomicroscope to determine the mode of failure. It was clearly showed that surface roughening of the aged composite substrate with air abrasion, followed by the application of Clearfil(™) repair adhesive system (Group IIIa) yielded the highest repair bond strength (32.3 ± 2.2 MPa). Surface treatment with air abrasion followed by bonding with Clearfil(™) repair adhesive system can be attempted clinically for the repair of composite restorations.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated the effect of digital veneering system (DVS) on strengthening the bond between a zirconia core and ceramic veneer. Specimens for Groups 1 (negative control), 2 (positive control), 3, and 4 used conventional porcelain veneering technique on untreated, sandblasted, coloring agent-treated, and modifier-treated zirconia cores respectively. Group 5 used DVS, where glass ceramic veneers -produced by computer-aided milling- were fused to zirconia cores. Microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) at the interface were measured. MTBS results of Groups 1 to 5, expressed in mean (standard deviation), were 28.1 (7.3), 27.8 (6.3), 30.0 (10.2), 32.9 (8.1), and 37.8 (8.1) MPa. The DVS group had significantly higher MTBS than the negative and positive controls (p<0.05). Results showed that DVS enhanced the bond strength between zirconia core and ceramic veneer, indicating that this system could reduce adhesive failure-related complications that frequently occur at the zirconia core-veneer interface.
    Dental Materials Journal 10/2014; 33(6):792-798. DOI:10.4012/dmj.2014-168 · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: All-ceramic restorations are attractive because of their long lasting esthetics and the ability to withstand the oral conditions. However, bonding to ceramics has challenged the dental community for the last few decades. The clinical success of a ceramic restoration is strongly dependent on the quality and durability of the bond between the resin cement and the restoration. This study presents the bonding mechanisms and the mechanical tests to evaluate the adhesive interfaces of resin-bonded ceramic restorations, mainly the zirconia-based restorations, which are the most popular. An adequate bond involves ceramic surface changes for mechanical retention, which can be achieved using primers, such as acids and airborne particle abrasion. Selective etching of high crystalline content ceramics mostly occurs within grain boundaries that offer little micromechanical retention and an insufficient bond to resin. The most popular surface treatment to improve adhesion to high crystalline content ceramics involves the treatment of surfaces with airborne particle abrasion and chemical bonding. Yet, there are reports on new methods to enhance the resin bond to zirconia that need further investigation. This study provides scientific evidences to guide the clinical procedures on bonding ceramic restorations.
    12/2014; 1(4). DOI:10.1007/s40496-014-0030-y

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
3,960 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014