Article

Risk factors for homelessness among women with schizophrenia

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 09/1995; 85(8 Pt 1):1153-6. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.85.8_Pt_1.1153
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A study of risk factors for homelessness among the severely mentally ill was extended to include women, and a case-control study of 100 indigent women with schizophrenia meeting criteria for literal homelessness and 100 such women with no history of homelessness was conducted. Subjects were recruited from shelters, clinics, and inpatient psychiatric programs in New York City. Clinical interviewers used standardized research instruments to probe three domains of risk factors: severity of mental illness, family background, and prior mental health service use. Findings adjusted for ethnicity revealed that homeless women had higher rates of a concurrent diagnosis of alcohol abuse, drug abuse, and antisocial personality disorder. Homeless women also had less adequate family support.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Lewis Alan Opler, Aug 18, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    • "Indeed, domestic violence, itself, is often a precipitant to homelessness (Bassuk et. al., 1997; Caton et al., 1995; Weitzman, Knickman, & Shinn, 1998). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: to organize a task force to report to him on the biopsychosocial consequences of early childhood violence. In the charge, he stated, An important prevention strategy for the field must focus on the reduction in childhood violence, including childhood sexual abuse. I propose bringing together 9–10 individuals from psychiatric, medical, social science, and the criminal justice fields to put together a resource document for psychiatry, other mental health disciplines, and medicine, with the primary focus on intervention strategies to reduce childhood violence. Alerting the media on the impact of childhood violence would be a major focus of the follow-up activities. The purpose of the task force is to develop a series of recommendations to guide the APA and psychiatrists throughout the country with attention to clinical care, neurobiology, future research, child development, parenting and family concerns, schools, and contextual activities that stimulate and escalate violent and traumatic episodes. The task force may make recommendations for public education and advocacy for an integrated "trauma focus" across disparate agencies, organizations, services, and systems. The task force must examine the need for better trauma education of professionals and the inclusion of trauma and trauma-spectrum disorders as part of the routine history and differential diagnosis, respectively. Members of the task force are
  • Source
    • "Another group of papers identify shared housing— " doubling up " —as a risk factor for homelessness. For instance: Weitzman et al. (1990), Caton et al. (1994, 1995), Bassuk et al. (1997), Shinn et al. (1998), Caton et al. (2000), Dworsky and Piliavin (2000), Lehmann et al. (2007). Sharing housing at one time is correlated with homelessness at a slightly later time. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most single adults share housing with other adults, and living alone is considerably more expensive than living with someone else. Yet policies that discourage shared housing for formerly homeless people or people at risk of becoming homeless are common, and those that encourage it are rare. This would be understandable if such housing adversely affected its users in some way. We ask whether shared housing produces adverse effects. Our provisional answer is no. For the most part, whether a person lives alone or shares housing seems to make no difference to the outcomes we studied although shared housing is associated with reduced psychotic symptomology. We use data from ACCESS, a 5-year, 18-site demonstration project with over 6,000 formerly homeless individuals as participants.
    Journal of Housing Economics 03/2010; 19(1):1-12. DOI:10.1016/j.jhe.2009.10.001 · 0.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Family members are more likely to hold a relative with a dual disorder responsible for his or her psychiatric symptoms than relatives with only SMI (Niv, Lopez, Glynn, & Mueser, 2007), while tense and stressful family relationships may contribute to more frequent relapses (Pourmand, Kavanagh, & Vaughan, 2005). The net result of this strain on the family can be the loss of family support, leading to housing instability, homeless (Caton et al., 1995; Caton, Shrout, Eagle, Opler, & Felix, 1994), and a more severe course of both disorders. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clients with severe mental illness and substance use disorder (i.e., dual disorders) frequently have contact with family members, who may provide valuable emotional and material support, but have limited skills and knowledge to promote recovery. Furthermore, high levels of family conflict and stress are related to higher rates of relapse. The present study was a two-site randomized controlled trial comparing a comprehensive, behaviorally-based family intervention for dual disorders program (FIDD) to a shorter-term family psychoeducational program (FPE). The modal family was a single male son in his early 30s diagnosed with both alcohol and drug problems and a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder participating with his middle-aged mother, with whom he lived. Initial engagement rates following consent to participate in the study and the family intervention programs were moderately high for both programs (88% and 84%, respectively), but rates of longer term retention and exposure to the core elements of each treatment model were lower (61% and 55%, respectively). Characteristics of the relatives were the strongest predictors of successful initial engagement in the family programs with the most important predictor being relatives who reported higher levels of benefit related to the relationship with the client. Subsequent successful exposure to the family treatment models was more strongly associated with client factors, including less severity of drug abuse and male client gender. The results suggest that attention to issues of motivating relatives to participate in family intervention, and more focused efforts to address the disruptive effects of drug abuse on the family could improve rates of engagement and retention in family programs for dual disorders.
    Addictive behaviors 05/2009; 34(10):867-77. DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.03.025 · 2.44 Impact Factor
Show more