Disability income, cocaine use, and repeated hospitalization among schizophrenic cocaine abusers--a government-sponsored revolving door?

West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA 90073, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 10/1995; 333(12):777-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199509213331207
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many patients with serious mental illness are addicted to drugs and alcohol. This comorbidity creates additional problems for the patients and for the clinicians, health care systems, and social-service agencies that provide services to this population. One problem is that disability income, which many people with serious mental illness receive to pay for basic needs, may facilitate drug abuse. In this study, we assessed the temporal patterns of cocaine use, psychiatric symptoms, and psychiatric hospitalization in a sample of schizophrenic patients receiving disability income.
We evaluated 105 male patients with schizophrenia and cocaine dependence at the time of their admission to the hospital. They had severe mental illness and a long-term dependence on cocaine, with repeated admissions to psychiatric hospitals; many were homeless. The severity of psychiatric symptoms and urinary concentrations of the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine were evaluated weekly for 15 weeks.
Cocaine use, psychiatric symptoms, and hospital admissions all peaked during the first week of the month, shortly after the arrival of the disability payment, on the first day. The average patient spent nearly half his total income on illegal drugs.
Among cocaine-abusing schizophrenic persons, the cyclic pattern of drug use strongly suggests that it is influenced by the monthly receipt of disability payments. The consequences of this cycle include the depletion of funds needed for housing and food, exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms, more frequent psychiatric hospitalization, and a high rate of homelessness. The troubling irony is that income intended to compensate for the disabling effects of severe mental illness may have the opposite effect.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Correction of lack of insight in psychiatric patients has the potential to improve both the accuracy of diagnosis and the effectiveness of therapy. Specific aspects of insight include `awareness' by an individual of specific symptoms and behaviours, plus the awareness that such symptoms can be attributed (by the patient) to the presence of a mental disorder. Although this review focuses on adherence with medication, `insight' encompasses far more than just medications and adherence with medication regimens. Impaired or restricted insight may be the result of many factors, including inability to read or to cognitively understand, deficient `health literacy' and the presence of psychopathology such as delusions or hallucinations, among others. While there is a detrimental effect on therapy because of lack of insight, accurate and comprehensive diagnoses may also be negatively affected because the patient may be unable to provide an adequate history enabling the establishment of such a diagnosis. Nonadherence can now be predicted much more accurately, especially with the use of techniques that assess the insight of the patients and their significant others. A variety of management strategies can be implemented effectively with accurate monitoring of medications and treatment-related behaviours, and by measuring adherence and the prediction of nonadherence. Many factors have been identified which are amenable to diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. Among these are the many simple but frequently overlooked issues including the high cost of medication and general or specific health illiteracy sufficient to make understanding medication directions difficult. However, cost-effective education and truly effective collaborations with patients (and significant others) remain major challenges. The ideal programmes for most patients, and especially those with complex problems such as comorbid alcohol or drug use, are the more comprehensive, multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes. Such comprehensive strategies are probably cost effective in the long term, although few cost analyses been carried out. Nevertheless, there is ample evidence that even patients who are difficult to manage can be effectively treated as inpatients and subsequently as outpatients. Perhaps the most important aspect of insight and adherence is early assessment and planning for those who are at risk of not cooperating with all kinds of therapy, including medication. The assessment and inventory of the positive factors that will facilitate cooperation and adherence to treatment regimens allows therapists to predict insight and adherence and to tailor their interventions and therapies so as to maximise the beneficial outcome.
    Disease Management and Health Outcomes 01/1998; 4(3):157-175. · 0.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How clients come to be assigned representative payees and/or conservators to manage their funds is not well understood. We compared clients assigned a payee during a clinical trial of a money management-based intervention to those not assigned payees and examined antecedents to payee assignment. One year after randomization, significantly more clients assigned to the advisor teller money manager (ATM) money management intervention were assigned payees than participants in the control condition (10 of 47 vs. 2 of 43; p = .02); those assigned payees had lower baseline GAF scores and participated more in study therapies. Several ATM clients were assigned payees after third parties paid more attention to clients' finances, and others after having negotiated storage of their funds with the ATM money manager during the study. Assignment of payees appears to be influenced by whether third parties critically attend to how clients' manage funds and by clients' receptiveness to having a payee.
    Community Mental Health Journal 06/2013; · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The community mental health movement of the 1960s enjoyed widespread public support but poorly served its intended target population of seriously mentally ill individuals because: (1) its professional values and technology were, at least initially, not well-oriented toward serving people with severe mental illness; (2) organizational structures linking Community Mental Health Centers with State Mental Health Agencies, State Hospitals, and other relevant service agencies were lacking; (3) ideologically driven aspirations diverted energies and resources into diffuse goals related to the achievement of social justice; and (4) performance objectives were not operationally defined or monitored. Since that time professional technologies and organizational linkages have substantially improved, but there has been a loss of public support for safety net services for the least well off, in part due to a general ascendence of individualist market values, declining civic engagement and reduced support for specialized services for the disadvantaged. A new community mental health movement would be less oriented towards stimulating broad community change, and more narrowly focused on building support among decision makers and the public at large to expand the availability of costly but effective and improved services for people with severe and persistent mental illness.
    Community Mental Health Journal 03/2000; 36(1):107-24. · 1.03 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014