Article

Disability income, cocaine use, and repeated hospitalization among schizophrenic cocaine abusers--a government-sponsored revolving door?

West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA 90073, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 10/1995; 333(12):777-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199509213331207
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many patients with serious mental illness are addicted to drugs and alcohol. This comorbidity creates additional problems for the patients and for the clinicians, health care systems, and social-service agencies that provide services to this population. One problem is that disability income, which many people with serious mental illness receive to pay for basic needs, may facilitate drug abuse. In this study, we assessed the temporal patterns of cocaine use, psychiatric symptoms, and psychiatric hospitalization in a sample of schizophrenic patients receiving disability income.
We evaluated 105 male patients with schizophrenia and cocaine dependence at the time of their admission to the hospital. They had severe mental illness and a long-term dependence on cocaine, with repeated admissions to psychiatric hospitals; many were homeless. The severity of psychiatric symptoms and urinary concentrations of the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine were evaluated weekly for 15 weeks.
Cocaine use, psychiatric symptoms, and hospital admissions all peaked during the first week of the month, shortly after the arrival of the disability payment, on the first day. The average patient spent nearly half his total income on illegal drugs.
Among cocaine-abusing schizophrenic persons, the cyclic pattern of drug use strongly suggests that it is influenced by the monthly receipt of disability payments. The consequences of this cycle include the depletion of funds needed for housing and food, exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms, more frequent psychiatric hospitalization, and a high rate of homelessness. The troubling irony is that income intended to compensate for the disabling effects of severe mental illness may have the opposite effect.

1 Bookmark
 · 
73 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Little is known about the relationship between timing of income assistance provision and health behaviours among injection drug users (IDU). We therefore investigated associations between income assistance provision and overdose patterns among IDU utilizing Insite, a supervised injection facility in Vancouver, Canada. Methods Using data collected at Insite between March 2004 and December 2010, we examined trends in overdoses and drugs injected. Data were stratified by proximity to the most recent day of issue of income assistance cheques, based on dates provided by the province. Results After adjustment for frequency of use, the risk of overdose for those injecting at Insite on the three days starting with “cheque day” was higher than for those injecting on other days (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.80–2.36, p < 0.001). These associations were also significant when drug-specific overdose rates were considered. The proportion of overdoses involving exclusive opioid use was lower for events occurring around cheque day than on other days (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47–0.84, p = 0.002), though we observed no significant association between the proportion of overdoses involving stimulants and cheque timing (p = 0.129). Conclusions The risk of overdose among IDU utilizing Insite was significantly higher on and immediately after cheque day than during other days, and may be associated with reduced tolerance and increases in binge drug use. Alternative models of income assistance administration should be evaluated to reduce overdoses around cheque day.
    The International journal on drug policy 07/2014; 25(4). DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.014 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The efficacy of contingency management (CM) for treating drug abuse is well supported. The most widely used form of CM is voucher-based reinforcement therapy (VBRT), where clients receive an escalating schedule of vouchers that can be redeemed for goods and services for meeting treatment goals. Though generally rejected due to concerns about potential harms to drug using participants, research suggests that cash may be a more effective reinforcer. This three-group randomized trial compared the efficacy of cash-based reinforcement therapy (CBRT) to VBRT and a non-CM condition on cocaine abstinence and treatment attendance; and examined whether CBRT resulted in greater levels of harm than VBRT. Findings indicated that the CBRT was as effective as VBRT when compared to the non-CM condition and that it did not increase rates of drug use, cravings, or high-risk behaviors. Future research should examine potential cost savings associated with a cash-based CM approach as this could have important implications for the wider adoption of the CM model.
    Journal of substance abuse treatment 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2014.03.001 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PubMed ID: 8592536
    New England Journal of Medicine 01/1996; 334(10):664-665. DOI:10.1056/NEJM199603073341014 · 54.42 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
77 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014