Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.

The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 5.14). 07/1995; 56(6):265-6.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Comments that S. A. Rasmussen (see record
1994-38510-001) oversimplified the overviews of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders by E. Hollander (e.g., see record
1993-45561-001). Hollander states that the overviews attempted to clarify the way in which the putative obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders are both similar and dissimilar to one another and to delineate several axes in order to discuss possible relationships between different obsessive compulsive spectrum disorders and symptoms. The research and clinical heuristic value of the obsessive-compulsive construct is noted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the phenomenology of Pathological Gambling (PG) is clearly characterized by impulsive features, some of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM-5) criteria for PG are similar to those of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Therefore, the compulsive–impulsive spectrum model may be a better (or complementary) fit with PG phenomenology. The present exploratory research was designed to further investigate the compulsive and impulsive features characterizing PG, by comparing PG individuals, alcohol dependents (ADs), OCD patients, and healthy controls (HCs) on both self-report and cognitive measures of compulsivity and impulsivity. A better understanding of the shared psychological and cognitive mechanisms underlying differently categorized compulsive and impulsive disorders may significantly impact on both clinical assessment and treatment strategies for PG patients. With respect to self-report measures, PG individuals reported more compulsive and impulsive features than did HCs. As regards motor inhibition ability indices, PG individuals and HCs performed similarly on the Go/No-go task and better than AD individuals and OCD patients. Results from the Iowa Gambling Task highlighted that PG, AD, and OCD participants performed worse than did HCs. An in-depth analysis of each group’s learning profile revealed similar patterns of impairment between PG and AD individuals in decision-making processes. Current findings support the utility of adopting a dimensional–transdiagnostic approach to complement the DSM-5 classification when working with PG individuals in clinical practice. Indeed, clinicians are encouraged to assess both compulsivity and impulsivity to provide individualized case conceptualizations and treatment plans focusing on the specific phenomenological features characterizing each PG patient.
    Journal of Gambling Studies 05/2014; · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Impulsivity and compulsivity represent useful conceptualizations that involve dissociable cognitive functions, which are mediated by neuroanatomically and neurochemically distinct components of cortico-subcortical circuitry. The constructs were historically viewed as diametrically opposed, with impulsivity being associated with risk-seeking and compulsivity with harm-avoidance. However, they are increasingly recognized to be linked by shared neuropsychological mechanisms involving dysfunctional inhibition of thoughts and behaviors. In this article, we selectively review new developments in the investigation of the neurocognition of impulsivity and compulsivity in humans, in order to advance our understanding of the pathophysiology of impulsive, compulsive, and addictive disorders and indicate new directions for research.
    CNS spectrums 02/2014; 19(1):69-89. · 1.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: Impulsivity represents a key dimension in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), in relation to outcome and course. It can be assessed through the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), which explores three main areas: attentional, motor and non-planning. Present study was aimed to assess level of impulsivity in a sample of OCD patients, in comparison with healthy controls, using the BIS. Methods: Seventy-five OCD outpatients - 48 of them having psychiatric comorbidities - and 70 healthy controls were assessed through the BIS and their scores analyzed using t-test for independent samples, on the basis of demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: BIS total scores resulted significantly higher (p: 0.01) in patients compared to controls, with no difference between pure and comorbid patients. Attentional impulsivity scores were significantly higher than controls in patients with pure (p < 0.001) and comorbid OCD (p < 0.001), without differences among them. Patients with multiple OC phenotypes showed higher, though statistically non-significant, total and attentional scores, compared to single phenotype patients. In addition, patients with comorbid major depressive disorder had higher, though statistically non-significant, total and attentional scores, compared to patients with comorbid bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and other disorders. Conclusions: Present findings showed higher impulsivity levels in OCD patients vs controls, particularly in the attentional area and ultimately suggest a potential cognitive implication.
    International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice 10/2013; · 1.31 Impact Factor