Efficacy of hepatobiliary scintigraphy in demonstrating cholangio-colic fistulae. Is formation of internal biliary fistula related to external leak closure?
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Dilli, NCT, IndiaClinical Nuclear Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.93). 05/1995; 20(4):318-21. DOI: 10.1097/00003072-199504000-00007
The authors present four cases of internal biliary fistulae (IBF) identified on hepatobiliary scintigraphy. All of the cases share common history of external biliary leak closure. Scintigraphy in all four cases showed a similar pattern of direct visualization of transverse colon without any significant small bowel activity. This suggests an increased frequency of IBF formation in cases with external fistulous tract closure. Retrospectively, it appears that spontaneous closure of external leak may be pathological consequence of formation of IBF involving hepatic flexure.
Article: Hepatobiliary scintigraphy.[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The recently acquired ability to tag 99mTc to a number of chemicals which are excreted avidly by the liver and concentrated in the gallbladder has enabled improved diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. This article gives a brief overview of the imaging technique.Australian family physician 07/1984; 13(6):420. · 0.71 Impact Factor
- Clinical Nuclear Medicine 03/2001; 26(2):150-1. DOI:10.1097/00003072-200102000-00014 · 3.93 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A cholecystocolic fistula, likely caused by Crohn's disease, was diagnosed by hepatobiliary scintigraphy only after the administration of morphine sulfate. Previous double-contrast barium enema, computed tomography, and routine hepatobiliary scintigraphy only suggested the presence of the cholecystocolic fistula. Given the high incidence of cholangitis secondary to the presence of small cholecystocolic fistulas, morphine-augmented hepatobiliary scintigraphy may be useful when a cholecystocolic fistula is indicated clinically and routine anatomic imaging and scintigraphy are unrevealing.Clinical Nuclear Medicine 07/2001; 26(6):552-4. DOI:10.1097/00003072-200106000-00019 · 3.93 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.