Staging and follow-up of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging versus computerized tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

University of Florence, Florens, Tuscany, Italy
International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics (Impact Factor: 4.26). 07/1995; 32(3):795-800. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00535-S
Source: PubMed


To compare computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) in relation to their accuracy in the staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC); to compare CT and MR in postirradiation follow-up of NPC.
Staging: From 1985 to 1993, 53 patients affected with NPC were studied with MR and CT. All cases were biopsy-proved epithelial carcinoma. Plain and contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed with third-generation scanners. Magnetic resonance were obtained with 0.5 and 1.5 Tesla units in sagittal, axial, and coronal planes. Computerized tomography was chosen as reference method and findings obtained with MR were compared to those obtained with CT. Follow-up: From 1985 to 1993, 53 patients irradiated with radical intent were followed up with both CT and MR; 71 examinations were performed in all. The baseline follow-up scan was performed, in general, no sooner than 2 months after the end of radiotherapy. All patients were submitted to unlimited clinical follow-up.
Staging: Magnetic resonance showed retropharyngeal adenopathies in 6 of 14 cases in which oropharyngeal involvement had been reported after CT; in 3 other patients, adenopathies were recognized on MR, while primary extent to parapharyngeal space had been diagnosed on CT initially. Infiltration of long muscles of the neck was revealed with MR in 14 cases. On the other hand, CT showed bone invasion in 12 patients vs. 8 on MR. Upstaging to T4 occurred in four cases on the basis of CT; no upstaging occurred after MR. Follow-up: Findings on CT were uncertain in 10 out of 53 patients, disease recurrence was excluded by MR in nine cases, whereas progressive disease was confirmed in one patient.
Staging: Our series shows that either CT and MR can provide essential information in the staging of NPC. Magnetic resonance, however, seems to provide the most detailed imaging of soft tissue invasion outside the nasopharynx and of retropharyngeal node involvement. Nonetheless, its limitations in evaluating bone details suggest that CT should be always performed when the status of base of skull is uncertain on MR. General reasons and our data indicate that CT can still be considered a valuable tool in routine NPC staging. Follow up: Magnetic resonance may be the modality of choice because it seems to solve, more often than CT, the problems of differentiation between postradiation changes and recurring tumor, apart from those cases showing subtle bone erosions on initial CT scan.

20 Reads
  • Source
    • "MRI may be promising as a noninvasive method for differentiating radiation fibrosis from local recurrence. However, the signal intensity pattern of the tumor is not specific and may be seen in radiation edema and infection [7, 8]. The disadvantage of PET is that it is optimally undertaken six months after EBRT [9,10,11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background This prospective study was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacies of nasopharyngoscopy and CT scan in the diagnosis of local failure of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods Total 52 patients of histopathologically proven nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), were included in this study. For every patient computed tomography (CT), nasopharyngoscopy and nasopharyngeal biopsies were performed 3 months after completion of EBRT. Results Three months after completion of EBRT, 9 patients (17.3%) had evident disease on histological examination of biopsies. Nasopharyngoscopy showed 77.78% sensitivity, 93.03% specificity, 70% positive predictive value and 95.24% negative predictive value in diagnosing the residual/recurrence of tumor. There was statistically significant agreement between the endoscopic findings and the histological findings (Kappa reliability coefficient=0.562, p<0.01). On the other hand, CT scan showed a 55.56% sensitivity, 39.53% specificity, 16.13% positive predictive value and 80.95% negative predictive value in diagnosing the residual tumor/recurrence. There was no statistically significant agreement between the CT scan findings and the histological findings (Kappa reliability coefficient = 0.038, p>0.05). Conclusion Nasopharyngoscopy should be considered the primary follow-up tool after radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. CT scan should be reserved for patients with histological or any symptomatic indications. Routine postnasal biopsies are not required.
    Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention 03/2014; 7(1):35-9.
  • Source
    • "MRI is the imaging of choice with locoregional disease, whilst CT depicts cortical bone erosion (Chong and Fan, 1996; Ng et al., 1997; Yen et al., 2003). Pakistan is still in the infancy of technological development, MRI inspite of its limitations in evaluation of bone details, where CT still outweighs MRI in tumors involving base of skull (Olmi et al., 1995) is preferably being used, rather than computed tomography (CT) for a better resolution and distinction of the tumor from surrounding soft tissue (particularly intracranial extension) and metastasis to the retropharyngeal cervical lymph nodes (Dillon et al., 1984), and bone marrow infiltration (Cheng et al., 1998). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a diverse entity with a multi-factorial etiology and a distinct racial and geographical distribution. It is curable if diagnosed and treated early. This descriptive study covered 30 patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) for nasopharyngeal malignancies during February 2006 till November 2010 at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi. Thirty cases of nasopharyngeal tumors were registered; a case of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and another of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were not included in the final analyses. There were 20 (71.0%) males and 8 (29.0%) females, 2 and 5 being observed in adolescents. The mean age of the male and female patients was 43.7 [SD 20.1] and 30.3 years [SD 17.9], respectively. Nodal involvement was seen in 23 cases and cranial in 8. Almost two-thirds the patients presented with a stage IV disease and all but two received chemotherapy. Electrons or photons were used for 23 cases; low anterior neck field was used in 25 cases. The doses of radiotherapy delivered ranged between 2000cGy to 7400cGy, the lower ones being given for palliation only. Once spinal cord tolerance was reached, electron boost fields were used in order to treat the posterior neck. A nasogastric tube was required for feeding in 2 (10.0%) male and 2 (25.0%) female patients; gastrostomy was needed for 1 (5.0%) patient. Radiotherapy (RT) induced reactions were observed in 90% of the patients, but were mild in most cases. In the presence of clinician based expertise and technical constraints in Pakistan, nasopharyngeal tumors are still being treated optimally with the need of creating a better awareness in public for early detection.
    Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP 01/2011; 12(3):735-8. · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: MRI has been used increasingly in the evaluation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) because of its good tissue contrast and multiplanar capacity. Although there are some controversies in assessing skull base invasion and cervical metastatic adenopathy, recent reports demonstrate that MRI is currently better than or as good as CT in defining the extent of NPC. During follow-up of patients with NPC after radiotherapy, MRI is also more effective than CT in demonstrating tumor recurrence and in detecting postradiation complications. However, the difficulty of using MRI to detect early mucosal recurrence and to differentiate postradiation tissue changes from local tumor recurrence should be recognized. This paper reviews the literature regarding MRI of NPC related to radiotherapy, with special emphasis on treatment planning, recurrence assessment, and complication detection.
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 8(2):327-36. · 3.21 Impact Factor
Show more


20 Reads
Available from